| Literature DB >> 30228987 |
Bong Jik Kim1, Jae Joon Han2, Seung Han Shin3, Han-Suk Kim3, Hye Ran Yang4, Eun Hwa Choi3, Mun Young Chang5, Sang-Yeon Lee6, Myung-Whan Suh6, Ja-Won Koo2, Jun Ho Lee6, Byung Yoon Choi2, Seung-Ha Oh6.
Abstract
Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infection is a common congenital infection that causes sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Despite its substantial impact on public health and cost burden, epidemiology and clinical features of CMV-related SNHL have never been reported in the Korean populations. This study investigated the detailed audiologic phenotypes of cCMV infection to see if a specific SNHL pattern is associated with a particular clinical setting. A total of 38 patients with cCMV infection were studied retrospectively. Patients were classified into three groups with distinct demographics: clinically driven diagnosis (n=17), routine newborn CMV screening according to the NICU protocols (n=10), or referral to ENT for cochlear implant (CI) (n=11). The incidence of cCMV infection was 3.6%, showing 33.3% of SNHL among cCMV patients, 38% of asymmetric hearing loss, 29% of late-onset hearing loss, and diverse severity spectrum in patients with CMV-related SNHL. CI recipients with CMV-related SNHL showed a significantly improved speech perception. Surprisingly, in 36.4 % of CI implantees, initial audiological manifestation was significant asymmetry of hearing thresholds between both ears, with better ear retaining significant residual hearing up to 50dB. CMV turns out to be a significant etiology of SNHL, first to date reported in the Korean pediatric population. Analysis of audiologic phenotypes showed a very wide spectrum of SNHL and favorable CI outcomes in case of profound deafness. Especially for the patients with asymmetric hearing loss, close surveillance of hearing should be warranted and CI could be considered on the worse side first, based on the observation of rapid progression to profound deafness of better side.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30228987 PMCID: PMC6136484 DOI: 10.1155/2018/7087586
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Demographics of patients with cCMV infection (Groups 1 and 2).
| Present ( | Absent ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Prematurity | 18 (2) | 9 (6) |
| Very Low birth weight (<1500g) | 15 (1) | 12 (7) |
| Hyperbilirubinemia requiring exchange transfusion | 0 | 21 (8) |
| NICU stay greater than 5 days | 22 (6) | 5 (2) |
| Hearing loss at birth | 5 | 16 |
Prematurity: neonates born at less than 37 weeks' gestation
Characteristics of hearing loss observed in patients with cCMV-related SNHL (Group 1).
| Case | NBHS | Sex | Laterality | Severity | Onset | Initial ABR (dB) | Follow-up | OAE | Progression | Antiviral therapy | Preterm birth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-1 | Refer | M | Bilateral | Severe | Cong. | B)NR | B)40 | Abnl. | Improved | Done | Yes |
| 1-2 | N/A | M | Bilateral | Mild | Unclear | B)30 | Abnl. | N/A | Done | Yes | |
| 1-3 | Refer | M | Bilateral | Severe | Cong. | R)NR, L)70 | Abnl. | N/A | Not done | No | |
| 1-4 | Pass | M | Unilateral | Mild | 2 mo. | R)25, L)35 | R)15, L)12 | Abnl. | Improved | Done | No |
| 1-5 | Pass | F | Bilateral | Moderate | 7 mo. | R)55, L)30 | B)35 | Abnl. | Improved | Done | No |
| 1-6 | Refer | F | Unilateral | Severe | Cong. | R)25, L)NR | R)25, L)NR | Abnl. | No change | Done | No |
| 1-7 | Refer | M | Unilateral | Severe | Cong. | R)NR, L)20 | R)NR, L)20 | Abnl. | No change | Done | No |
| 1-8 | Refer | F | Bilateral | N/A | Cong. | N/A | N/A | N/A | Done | No |
Abnl: abnormal; Cong.: congenital; NR: no response; mo.: month-old; N/A: not available
Figure 1Audiologic phenotypes of 8 patients with CMV-related SNHL. (a) Proportion of SNHL in cCMV patients according to gender. (b) Classification of SNHL according to severity. (c), (d) Pie charts showing laterality and onset of SNHL.
Progression of hearing loss observed in patients with cCMV-related SNHL (Groups 1 and 3).
| Case | NBHS | Sex | Laterality | Severity | Onset | Initial ABR (dB) | Follow-up | Progression |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-1 | Refer | M | Bilateral | Severe | Cong. | B)NR | B)40 | Improved |
| 1-4 | Pass | M | Unilateral | Mild | 2 mo. | R)25, L)35 | R)15, L)10 | Improved |
| 1-5 | Pass | F | Bilateral | Moderate | 7 mo. | R)55, L)30 | B)35 | Improved |
| 1-6 | Refer | F | Unilateral | Severe | Cong. | R)25, L)NR | R)25, L)NR | No change |
| 1-7 | Refer | M | Unilateral | Severe | Cong. | R)NR, L)20 | R)NR, L)20 | No change |
| 3-1 | Refer | F | Bilateral | Profound | Cong. | B)NR | R)100, L)100 | No change |
| 3-2 | Pass | M | Bilateral | Profound | 26 mo. | B)NR | R)100, L)100 | No change |
| 3-3 | Refer | M | Bilateral | Profound | Cong. | R)90, L)NR | R)115, L)110 | Aggravated |
| 3-4 | Refer | M | Bilateral | Profound | Cong. | R)50, L)NR | R)90, L)90 | Aggravated (Asymmetric to symmetric profound) |
| 3-5 | Refer | M | Bilateral | Profound | Cong. | B)NR | R)100, L)110 | No change |
| 3-6 | Refer | M | Bilateral | Profound | Cong. | B)NR | B)115 | No change |
| 3-7 | N/A | F | Bilateral | Profound | Unclear | B)NR | R)95, L)105 | No change |
| 3-8 | Refer | M | Bilateral | Profound | Cong. | R)70, L)NR | R)90, L)100 | Aggravated (Asymmetric to symmetric profound) |
| 3-9 | Refer | M | Bilateral | Profound | Cong. | R)55, L)105 | R)100, L)110 | Aggravated (Asymmetric to symmetric profound) |
| 3-10 | Refer | F | Bilateral | Profound | Cong. | R)NR, L)50 | B)100 | Aggravated (Asymmetric to symmetric profound) |
| 3-11 | Refer | M | Bilateral | Profound | Cong. | B)NR | B)100 | No change |
Abnl: abnormal; Cong.: congenital; NR: no response; mo.: month-old; N/A: not available
Figure 2Comparison of mean CAP scores at each time point before and after CI. The mean CAP score gradually improved after CI during the observation period, with statistical significance (P=0.0013, 0.0006, respectively, at mean CAP score of 6mo and 12mo compared to preoperative score).