Literature DB >> 26347967

Variations in Laparoscopic Colectomy Utilization in the United States.

Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh1, Joseph C Carmichael, Steven Mills, Alessio Pigazzi, Ninh T Nguyen, Michael J Stamos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent published articles reported a wide geographic variation in the utilization of laparoscopic colectomy in the United States.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to report the current rates of laparoscopic colon resection in different types of hospitals in the United States.
DESIGN: The Nationwide Inpatients Sample database was used to examine the clinical data of patients undergoing elective colon resection for the diagnosis of colon cancer or diverticular disease from 2009 to 2012.
SETTING: Multivariate regression analysis was performed to compare different hospital types and regions regarding the utilization of laparoscopy. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing elective colon resection for the diagnosis of colon cancer or diverticular disease from 2009 to 2012 were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was the rates of laparoscopic colon resection in different types of hospitals.
RESULTS: We sampled a total of 309,816 patients who underwent elective colon resection. Of these, 171,666 (55.4%) had a laparoscopic operation. The utilization of a laparoscopic approach increased from 51.3% in 2009 to 59.3% in 2012. The increased utilization of a laparoscopic approach was seen in both urban (53.6% vs 61.6%) and rural hospitals (33.4% vs 42.3%), for colon cancer (45% vs 53.5%), and diverticular disease (61.9% vs 68.2%). The conversion rate to open surgery for diverticular disease was significantly higher than for colon cancer (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 1.23; p < 0.01). After adjustment, urban hospitals (AOR, 2.13; p < 0.01), teaching hospitals (AOR, 1.13; p < 0.01), and large hospitals (AOR, 1.33; p < 0.01) had a greater utilization of laparoscopic surgery. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective nature.
CONCLUSIONS: Although we have finally reached the point where a majority of patients undergoing an elective colectomy for diverticular disease and colon cancer receive a laparoscopic operation, there is wide variation in the implementation of laparoscopic surgery in colon resection in the United States. The utilization of a laparoscopic approach has associations with hospital factors such as size, teaching status of the hospital, and geographic location (urban vs rural).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26347967     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  28 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic colectomy: trends in implementation in Canada and globally

Authors:  Marius Hoogerboord; James Ellsmere; Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda; Carl Brown; Shiva Jayaraman; David Urbach; Sean Cleary
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Tips, Tricks, and Technique for Laparoscopic Colectomy.

Authors:  Alexandra Briggs; Joel Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-04

3.  Is right colectomy a complete learning procedure for a robotic surgical program?

Authors:  Paolo Raimondi; Francesco Marchegiani; Massimo Cieri; Annadomenica Cichella; Roberto Cotellese; Paolo Innocenti
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-05-12

4.  A new perspective on the value of minimally invasive colorectal surgery-payer, provider, and patient benefits.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Anthony J Senagore; Kathryn Fitch; Andrew Bochner; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Uptake of elective laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer in Canada from 2004/05 to 2014/15: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  C Marius Hoogerboord; Adrian R Levy; Min Hu; Gordon Flowerdew; Geoffrey Porter
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-09-18

6.  With widespread adoption of MIS colectomy for colon cancer, does hospital type matter?

Authors:  K Freischlag; M Adam; M Turner; J Watson; B Ezekian; P M Schroder; C Mantyh; J Migaly
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Project 6 Summit: SAGES telementoring initiative.

Authors:  Christopher M Schlachta; Ninh T Nguyen; Todd Ponsky; Brian Dunkin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Transanal TATA/TME: a case-matched study of taTME versus laparoscopic TME surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J H Marks; G A Montenegro; J F Salem; M V Shields; G J Marks
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Robert K Cleary; Andrew J Mullard; Jane Ferraro; Scott E Regenbogen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Niraj Parikh; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.