| Literature DB >> 30227885 |
Anna Szeremeta1, Agnieszka Jura-Półtorak2, Ewa Maria Koźma2, Andrzej Głowacki2, Eugeniusz Józef Kucharz3, Magdalena Kopeć-Mędrek3, Krystyna Olczyk2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this study, the effect of 15-month anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) treatment on circulating levels of plasma sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and the nonsulfated GAG hyaluronic acid (HA) in female rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients was assessed.Entities:
Keywords: Glycosaminoglycans; Hyaluronic acid; Keratan sulfate; Rheumatoid arthritis; Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30227885 PMCID: PMC6145339 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-018-1711-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthritis Res Ther ISSN: 1478-6354 Impact factor: 5.156
Baseline characteristics of female RA patients treated with TNFαI
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| All women with RA, | 45 (100) |
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 47.42 (13.70) |
| Disease duration (years), median (IQR) | 7 (4–16) |
| BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 21.99 (2.26) |
| RF positive, | 44 (97.78) |
| Anti-CCP positive, | 45 (100) |
| SJC28, median (IQR) | 8 (5–10) |
| TJC28, median (IQR) | 14 (10–19) |
| VAS, median (IQR) | 80 (80–80) |
| DAS28 ESR, mean (SD) | 6.10 (0.58) |
| ESR (mm/h), median (IQR) | 18.0 (11.0–33.0) |
| CRP (mg/l), median (IQR) | 5.0 (4.0–14.9) |
| TNFαI therapy, | |
| Etanercept (Enbrel) | 19 (42.22) |
| Adalimumab (Humira) | 22 (48.89) |
| Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) | 4 (8.89) |
anti-CCP anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody, BMI body mass index, CRP C-reactive protein, DAS28 Disease Activity Score based on evaluation of 28 joints, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, IQR interquartile range, RA rheumatoid arthritis, RF rheumatoid factor, SD standard deviation, SJC28 swollen joint count of 28 joints, TJC28 tender joint count of 28 joints, TNFαI tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors, VAS visual analog scale
Time-course changes in biochemical, clinical, and functional measures during 15-month anti-TNF-α therapy
| Time after starting anti-TNF-α therapy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 (baseline) | T1 (3 months) | T2 (9 months) | T3 (15 months) | |
| Women with RA, | 29 (100) | |||
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 44.38 (14.17) | |||
| Disease duration (years), median (IQR) | 5 (3–8) | |||
| BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) | 21.25 (2.28) | |||
| RF positive, | 29 (100) | |||
| Anti-CCP positive, | 29 (100) | |||
| SJC28, median (IQR) | 6 (5–10) | 3 (2–3)a, c, d | 0 (0–1)a, b | 0 (0–0)a, b |
| TJC28, median (IQR) | 14 (10–20) | 5 (3–7)a, c, d | 2 (1–2)a, b, d | 0 (0–1)a, b, c |
| VAS, median (IQR) | 80 (80–80) | 50 (35–55)a, c, d | 25 (10–30)a, b, d | 10 (5–20)a, b, c |
| DAS28 ESR, mean (SD) | 5.99 (0.50) | 4.00 (0.73)a, c, d | 2.74 (0.72)a, b, d | 2.06 (0.64)a, b, c |
| Disease activity, | ||||
| High (> 5.1) | 29 (100) | 2 (6.90) | 0 | 0 |
| Moderate (> 3.2 and ≤ 5.1) | 0 | 24 (82.76) | 6 (20.69) | 0 |
| Low (≤ 3.2 and > 2.6) | 0 | 3 (10.34) | 12 (41.38) | 6 (20.69) |
| Remission (≤ 2.6) | 0 | 0 | 11 (37.93) | 23 (79.31) |
| ESR (mm/h), median (IQR) | 15.0 (10.0–31.0) | 10.0 (8.0–17.0) | 10.0 (8.0–14.0)a | 11.0 (8.0–14.0)a |
| CRP (mg/l), median (IQR) | 5.0 (4.0–9.2) | 4.0 (2.0–4.0) | 3.0 (1.30–4.0)a | 2.0 (1.0–4.0)a |
| TNFαI therapy, | ||||
| Etanercept (Enbrel) | 13 (44.83) | |||
| Adalimumab (Humira) | 14 (48.27) | |||
| Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) | 2 (6.90) | |||
Differences noted for all variables (except DAS28 ESR) considered significant at p < 0.0083 by applying Bonferroni correction. Differences noted for DAS28 ESR considered significant at p < 0.001
anti-CCP anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody, BMI body mass index, CRP C-reactive protein, DAS28 Disease Activity Score based on evaluation of 28 joints, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, IQR interquartile range, RA rheumatoid arthritis, RF rheumatoid factor, SD standard deviation, SJC28 swollen joint count of 28 joints, TJC28 tender joint count of 28 joints, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor alpha, TNFαI tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors, VAS Visual analog scale
aStatistically significant differences compared to T0
bStatistically significant differences compared to T1
cStatistically significant differences compared to T2
dStatistically significant differences compared to T3
Fig. 1Plasma levels of (a) GAGs, (b) KS, and (c) HA in RA patients (n = 29) before anti-TNF-α therapy and in healthy subjects (n = 20). Data analyzed using Mann–Whitney U test. ap < 0.001, compared to healthy subjects. GAG glycosaminoglycan, HA hyaluronic acid, KS keratan sulfate, Max maximum, Min minimum, RA rheumatoid arthritis
Fig. 2Temporal course of plasma (a) GAGs, (b) KS, and (c) HA levels in RA patients (n = 29) during 15-month anti-TNF-α therapy . Results expressed as mean (SD). Data analyzed using one-way RM-ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. ap < 0.001, compared to baseline (T0); bp < 0.001, compared to 3 months after therapy (T1); cp < 0.001, compared to 9 months after therapy (T2); dp < 0.001, compared to 15 months after therapy (T3). GAG glycosaminoglycan, HA hyaluronic acid, KS keratan sulfate, RM-ANOVA repeated measures analysis of variance
Fig. 3Plasma levels of (a) GAGs, (b) KS, and (c) HA in RA patients (n = 29) after anti-TNF-α therapy and in healthy subjects (n = 20). Data analyzed using Mann–Whitney U test. GAG glycosaminoglycan, HA hyaluronic acid, KS keratan sulfate, Max maximum, Min minimum, RA rheumatoid arthritis