Literature DB >> 30225844

Feasibility of desensitizing children highly allergic to peanut by high-dose oral immunotherapy.

Tonje Reier-Nilsen1,2, Merethe Melbye Michelsen1,2, Karin C Lødrup Carlsen1,2, Kai-Håkon Carlsen1,2, Petter Mowinckel1, Unni C Nygaard3, Ellen Namork3, Magnus P Borres4,5, Geir Håland1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the feasibility, efficacy and safety of high-dose oral immunotherapy (OIT) in children highly allergic to peanuts.
OBJECTIVE: In children highly allergic to peanut, we primarily aimed to determine the feasibility of reaching the maximum maintenance dose (MMD) of 5000 mg peanut protein or, alternatively, a lower individual maintenance dose (IMD), by OIT up-dosing. Secondarily, we aimed to identify adverse events (AEs) and determine factors associated with reaching a maintenance dose.
METHODS: The TAKE-AWAY peanut OIT trial enrolled 77 children 5-15 years old, with a positive oral peanut challenge. Fifty-seven were randomized to OIT with biweekly dose step-up until reaching MMD or IMD and 20 to observation only. Demographic and biological characteristics, AEs, medication and protocol deviations were explored for associations with reaching maintenance dose.
RESULTS: All children had anaphylaxis defined by objective symptoms in minimum two organ systems during baseline challenge. The MMD was reached by 21.1%, while 54.4% reached an IMD of median (minimum, maximum) 2700 (250, 4000) mg peanut protein, whereas 24.5% discontinued OIT. During up-dosing, 19.4% experienced anaphylaxis. Not reaching the MMD was caused by distaste for peanuts (66.7%), unacceptable AEs (26.7%) and social reasons (6.7%). Increased peanut s-IgG4 /s-IgE ratio (OR [95% CI]: 1.02 [1.00, 1.04]) was associated with reaching MMD.
CONCLUSION: Although 75.5% of children with peanut anaphylaxis reached a maintenance dose of 0.25-5 g, only 21.1% reached the MMD. Distaste for peanuts and AEs, including high risk of anaphylaxis, limited the feasibility of reaching MMD.
© 2018 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse events; desensitization; feasibility; oral immunotherapy; peanut allergy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30225844     DOI: 10.1111/all.13604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of oral immunotherapy efficacy and safety by maintenance dose dependency: A multicenter randomized study.

Authors:  Kiyotake Ogura; Noriyuki Yanagida; Sakura Sato; Takanori Imai; Komei Ito; Naoyuki Kando; Masanori Ikeda; Rumiko Shibata; Yoko Murakami; Takao Fujisawa; Mizuho Nagao; Norio Kawamoto; Naomi Kondo; Atsuo Urisu; Ikuya Tsuge; Yasuto Kondo; Kazuko Sugai; Osamu Uchida; Mitsuyoshi Urashima; Masami Taniguchi; Motohiro Ebisawa
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.084

2.  Sustained outcomes in oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy (POISED study): a large, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study.

Authors:  R Sharon Chinthrajah; Natasha Purington; Sandra Andorf; Andrew Long; Katherine L O'Laughlin; Shu Chen Lyu; Monali Manohar; Scott D Boyd; Robert Tibshirani; Holden Maecker; Marshall Plaut; Kaori Mukai; Mindy Tsai; Manisha Desai; Stephen J Galli; Kari C Nadeau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy: The con argument.

Authors:  Alessandro Fiocchi; Maria Cristina Artesani; Vincenzo Fierro; Carla Riccardi; Lamia Dahdah; Maurizio Mennini
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 4.084

Review 4.  Practical challenges in oral immunotherapy resolved through patient-centered care.

Authors:  François Graham; Douglas P Mack; Philippe Bégin
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.406

Review 5.  New Insights into the Role of PD-1 and Its Ligands in Allergic Disease.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Galván Morales; Josaphat Miguel Montero-Vargas; Juan Carlos Vizuet-de-Rueda; Luis M Teran
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Transitioning peanut oral immunotherapy to clinical practice.

Authors:  S Lazizi; R Labrosse; F Graham
Journal:  Front Allergy       Date:  2022-08-26

Review 7.  CSACI guidelines for the ethical, evidence-based and patient-oriented clinical practice of oral immunotherapy in IgE-mediated food allergy.

Authors:  P Bégin; E S Chan; H Kim; M Wagner; M S Cellier; C Favron-Godbout; E M Abrams; M Ben-Shoshan; S B Cameron; S Carr; D Fischer; A Haynes; S Kapur; M N Primeau; J Upton; T K Vander Leek; M M Goetghebeur
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.406

8.  Adverse events associated with peanut oral immunotherapy in children - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luke E Grzeskowiak; Billy Tao; Emma Knight; Sarah Cohen-Woods; Timothy Chataway
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.