Literature DB >> 30225783

Biomarkers Associated with Clinical Outcome of Advanced Melanoma Patients Treated with Ipilimumab.

Tímea Balatoni1, Andrea Ladányi2, Georgina Fröhlich3, Kata Czirbesz4, Péter Kovács4, Gitta Pánczél4, Eszter Bence2, Vanda Plótár2, Gabriella Liszkay4.   

Abstract

Ipilimumab was the first immunotherapy approved for metastatic melanoma in decades and is currently registered as a second-line treatment. However, new immunotherapies, in combination with ipilimumab, offer even better clinical outcomes for patients compared with single-agent treatments, at the expense of improved toxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of ipilimumab outside the clinical trials and to identify survival predictors for treatment benefit. Data were collected on 47 advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab between 2010 and 2015 at a single center. Association of clinical characteristics (including primary tumor characteristics), serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, absolute eosinophil, lymphocyte, and neutrophil count, neutrophil/lymphocyte and eosinophil/lymphocyte ratio with toxicity and clinical outcome were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis. Median progression-free survival at a median follow-up of 10 months was 2.7 months and median overall survival was 9.8 months. Objective response was observed in 17% of patients and the disease control rate at week 24 was 40%. The 1- and 2-year survival rates documented were 40 and 28%, respectively. Significant association between high LDH level (>1.5× upper limit of normal) and decreased overall survival was demonstrated in uni- and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.554, 95% CI: 1.225-10.306, p = 0.019). Neither biomarkers nor clinical outcome were associated with toxicity. Using baseline serum LDH to identify patients most likely to benefit from ipilimumab therapy could serve as a simple and inexpensive biomarker of clinical outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ipilimumab; Lactate dehydrogenase; Melanoma; Predictive factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30225783     DOI: 10.1007/s12253-018-0466-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  46 in total

1.  Experience in daily practice with ipilimumab for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma: an early increase in lymphocyte and eosinophil counts is associated with improved survival.

Authors:  J Delyon; C Mateus; D Lefeuvre; E Lanoy; L Zitvogel; N Chaput; S Roy; A M M Eggermont; E Routier; C Robert
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  Prognostic and predictive significance of immune cells infiltrating cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Andrea Ladányi
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 4.693

3.  Baseline Peripheral Blood Biomarkers Associated with Clinical Outcome of Advanced Melanoma Patients Treated with Ipilimumab.

Authors:  Alexander Martens; Kilian Wistuba-Hamprecht; Marnix Geukes Foppen; Jianda Yuan; Michael A Postow; Phillip Wong; Emanuela Romano; Amir Khammari; Brigitte Dreno; Mariaelena Capone; Paolo A Ascierto; Anna Maria Di Giacomo; Michele Maio; Bastian Schilling; Antje Sucker; Dirk Schadendorf; Jessica C Hassel; Thomas K Eigentler; Peter Martus; Jedd D Wolchok; Christian Blank; Graham Pawelec; Claus Garbe; Benjamin Weide
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Ipilimumab in patients with melanoma and brain metastases: an open-label, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Kim Margolin; Marc S Ernstoff; Omid Hamid; Donald Lawrence; David McDermott; Igor Puzanov; Jedd D Wolchok; Joseph I Clark; Mario Sznol; Theodore F Logan; Jon Richards; Tracy Michener; Agnes Balogh; Kevin N Heller; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Prognostic factors related to clinical response in patients with metastatic melanoma treated by CTL-associated antigen-4 blockade.

Authors:  Stephanie G Downey; Jacob A Klapper; Franz O Smith; James C Yang; Richard M Sherry; Richard E Royal; Udai S Kammula; Marybeth S Hughes; Tamika E Allen; Catherine L Levy; Michael Yellin; Geoffrey Nichol; Donald E White; Seth M Steinberg; Steven A Rosenberg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arnoud J Templeton; Mairéad G McNamara; Boštjan Šeruga; Francisco E Vera-Badillo; Priya Aneja; Alberto Ocaña; Raya Leibowitz-Amit; Guru Sonpavde; Jennifer J Knox; Ben Tran; Ian F Tannock; Eitan Amir
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer.

Authors:  Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  B-RAF and N-RAS mutations are preserved during short time in vitro propagation and differentially impact prognosis.

Authors:  Selma Ugurel; Ranjit K Thirumaran; Sandra Bloethner; Andreas Gast; Antje Sucker; Jan Mueller-Berghaus; Werner Rittgen; Kari Hemminki; Jürgen C Becker; Rajiv Kumar; Dirk Schadendorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ipilimumab for advanced melanoma: experience from the Spanish Expanded Access Program.

Authors:  Alfonso Berrocal; Ana Arance; Jose Antonio Lopez Martin; Virtudes Soriano; Eva Muñoz; Lorenzo Alonso; Enrique Espinosa; Pilar Lopez Criado; Javier Valdivia; Salvador Martin Algarra
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Correlation of BRAF and NRAS mutation status with outcome, site of distant metastasis and response to chemotherapy in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  M S Carlino; L E Haydu; H Kakavand; A M Menzies; A L Hamilton; B Yu; C C Ng; W A Cooper; J F Thompson; R F Kefford; S A O'Toole; R A Scolyer; G V Long
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

1.  Prognostic value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yongchao Zhang; Bozhi Liu; Sergei Kotenko; Wei Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 2.  Molecular Pathology of Skin Melanoma: Epidemiology, Differential Diagnostics, Prognosis and Therapy Prediction.

Authors:  József Tímár; Andrea Ladányi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 3.  Lymphopenia in Cancer Patients and its Effects on Response to Immunotherapy: an opportunity for combination with Cytokines?

Authors:  Christine Ménétrier-Caux; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Jean-Yves Blay; Christophe Caux
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 13.751

4.  Prognostic and predictive factors associated with ipilimumab-related adverse events: a retrospective analysis of 11 NCI-sponsored phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Aman Chauhan; Tanvir Kabir; Jianrong Wu; Jing Wei; Mary Cook; Charles A Kunos
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2020-04-21

Review 5.  The Prognostic Significance of Baseline Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Melanoma Patients Receiving Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yayun Li; Yu Meng; Huiyan Sun; Lin Ye; Furong Zeng; Xiang Chen; Guangtong Deng
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.456

6.  The percentage of peripheral eosinophils as a sensitive marker for differentiating FIGO grade in endometrial adenocarcinomas

Authors:  Serkan Akış; Uğur Kemal Öztürk; Esra Keleş; Cihat Murat Alınca; Murat Api; Canan Kabaca
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2022-03-10

7.  Blood eosinophilic relative count is prognostic for breast cancer and associated with the presence of tumor at diagnosis and at time of relapse.

Authors:  Concetta Elisa Onesti; Claire Josse; Delphine Boulet; Jérôme Thiry; Barbara Beaumecker; Vincent Bours; Guy Jerusalem
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 8.110

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.