Literature DB >> 12759500

Influence of the route of reconstruction on morbidity, mortality and local recurrence after esophagectomy for cancer.

Alfred C C Wong1, Simon Law, John Wong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A choice of retrosternal or orthotopic route for reconstruction exists after three-phase esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis. Whether the route of reconstruction affects postoperative morbidity, mortality and recurrence patterns remains controversial. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients with cancer of the thoracic esophagus who underwent three-phase esophagectomy between 1990 and 1999 were studied. Postoperative outcome, recurrence patterns and survival were analyzed from a prospectively collected database.
RESULTS: Seventy-five patients underwent three-phase esophagectomy. There were 46 patients in the retrosternal group and 29 in the orthotopic group. The mean age of the retrosternal group was younger than the orthotopic group, 60 and 66 years, respectively (p = 0.004). The retrosternal group also had more advanced disease; 24% of patients had curative resection compared with 59% in the orthotopic group (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications except that the retrosternal group had more blood loss, median 800 ml compared with 700 ml (p = 0.04). Hospital mortality was 13% in the retrosternal group and 3.4% in the orthotopic group (p = 0.24). Multivariate analysis showed that age (odds ratio 1.16, p = 0.035) and pulmonary risk (odds ratio 10, p = 0.01) were predictive of hospital mortality, but not the route of reconstruction. No patient in the retrosternal group developed recurrence in the gastric conduit compared to 4 of 28 patients (14%) in the orthotopic group (p = 0.03). Two of these patients were symptomatic with bleeding from the intragastric recurrence. Survival was worse in the retrosternal group, 5-year survival was 29.8 vs. 8.2% (p < 0.01), reflecting the more advanced disease and higher prevalence of palliative resections.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiopulmonary complications and hospital mortality were not significantly different in the two groups. Recurrent tumor infiltration of the gastric conduit occurred in 14% of patients when the orthotopic route was used. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12759500     DOI: 10.1159/000070387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  8 in total

1.  What is the best management strategy for high grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus? A cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  N J Shaheen; J M Inadomi; B F Overholt; P Sharma
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Impact of the route of reconstruction on post-operative morbidity and malnutrition after esophagectomy: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Makoto Yamasaki; Hiroshi Miyata; Takushi Yasuda; Osamu Shiraishi; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Masaaki Motoori; Masahiko Yano; Hitoshi Shiozaki; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Anatomically based comparison of the different transthoracic routes for colon ascension after total esogastrectomy.

Authors:  Manuela Perez; Thierry Haumont; Jean Michel Arnoux; Imen Redjaimia; Nathalie Rouard; Alain Blum; Nicolas Reibel; Nicolas Jay; Marc Braun; Gilles Grosdidier
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study.

Authors:  Sebastian F Schoppmann; Gerhard Prager; Felix B Langer; Franz M Riegler; Barbara Kabon; Edith Fleischmann; Johannes Zacherl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparison between different reconstruction routes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yu-Zhen Zheng; Shu-Qin Dai; Wei Li; Xun Cao; Xin Wang; Jian-Hua Fu; Peng Lin; Lan-Jun Zhang; Bin Lu; Jun-Ye Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Association of level of anastomosis and anastomotic leak after esophagectomy in anterior mediastinal reconstruction.

Authors:  Katsunori Nishikawa; Tetsuji Fujita; Yako Hasegawa; Yujiro Tanaka; Akira Matsumoto; Norio Mitsumori; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.230

7.  Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Neoplastic Esophagogastric Anastomotic Strictures After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Pengfei Xie; Meipan Yin; Wei He; Yaozhen Ma; Chunxia Li; Zhen Li; Xiaobing Li; Shuai Wang; Gang Wu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Impact of Reconstruction Route on Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy: Analysis of Esophagectomies in the Japanese National Clinical Database.

Authors:  Hirotoshi Kikuchi; Hideki Endo; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Soji Ozawa; Hiroaki Miyata; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Hisahiro Matsubara; Yuichiro Doki; Yuko Kitagawa; Hiroya Takeuchi
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-09-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.