Literature DB >> 30225679

Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, BC Sealer and a novel tricalcium silicate sealer: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.

Roula El Hachem1, Issam Khalil2, Guy Le Brun3, Fabrice Pellen3, Bernard Le Jeune3, Maha Daou4, Nada El Osta5, Alfred Naaman2, Marie Abboud6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the dentinal tubule penetration of three different sealers, AH Plus, BC Sealer and a novel tricalcium silicate sealer (NTS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-six human maxillary central incisors were divided into three experimental groups (n = 32) and were filled with gutta-percha using a single-cone technique in conjunction with one of the three sealers: AH Plus, BC Sealer or NTS. The roots in each group were cross-sectioned at 1 and 5 mm from the root apex, and the surfaces were examined under confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). The sealer penetration depths were measured at their maximum depths and at four circumferential depths (12, 3, 6 and 9 o'clock) and were evaluated using ImageJ software (ImageJ, NIH).
RESULTS: The maximum and mean penetration depths were significantly higher at 5 mm compared to 1 mm from the apex in the AH Plus (p < 0.001), BC Sealer (p < 0.001) and NTS groups (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the groups at 1 mm for both parameters. The maximum and mean penetration depths were significantly lower at 5 mm for AH Plus compared with the other two groups (p = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: Within the study limitations, the BC Sealer and NTS demonstrated better tubule penetration results than the AH Plus sealer. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although no study has confirmed a relationship between the penetration depth of root canal sealers and the prevention of apical periodontitis, dentinal tubule sealer penetration may improve obturation quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AH Plus; BC Sealer; Confocal laser scanning microscopy; NTS; Tubule penetration

Year:  2018        PMID: 30225679     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2632-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  12 in total

1.  Reciproc and Reciproc Blue in the removal of bioceramic and resin-based sealers in retreatment procedures.

Authors:  Kaline Romeiro; Andressa de Almeida; Marcely Cassimiro; Luciana Gominho; Eugênia Dantas; Nayane Chagas; Christianne Velozo; Laila Freire; Diana Albuquerque
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Sealer penetration: effect of separated file's cross-section, taper and motion characteristics.

Authors:  Ayhan Eymirli; Emel Uzunoğlu Özyürek; Ahmet Serper
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Lack of Correlation Between the Penetration of Two Types of Sealers and Interfacial Adaptation to Root Dentine.

Authors:  Roula El Hachem; Nada El Osta; Hala Sacre; Pascale Salameh; Elie Wassef; Guy Le Brun; Fabrice Pellen; Bernard Le Jeune; Maha H Daou; Issam Khalil; Marie Abboud
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2022-06

4.  Comparison of bioceramic and epoxy resin sealers in terms of marginal adaptation and tubular penetration depth with different obturation techniques in premolar teeth: A scanning electron microscope and confocal laser scanning microscopy study.

Authors:  Reza Najafzadeh; Mahta Fazlyab; Ehsan Esnaashari
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2022-05-14

5.  A comparative study of dentinal tubule penetration and the retreatability of EndoSequence BC Sealer HiFlow, iRoot SP, and AH Plus with different obturation techniques.

Authors:  Ruiqi Yang; Jun Tian; Xiangya Huang; Shuxiang Lei; Yanling Cai; Zhezhen Xu; Xi Wei
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Comparison of apical sealing ability of bioceramic sealer and epoxy resin-based sealer using the fluid filtration technique and scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  Widcha Asawaworarit; Thitapa Pinyosopon; Kanittha Kijsamanmith
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.080

7.  Could the Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Presentation Form Influence Dentinal Sealing? An In Vitro Confocal Laser Study on Tubular Penetration.

Authors:  Paula Muedra; Leopoldo Forner; Adrián Lozano; José L Sanz; Francisco J Rodríguez-Lozano; Julia Guerrero-Gironés; Francesco Riccitiello; Gianrico Spagnuolo; Carmen Llena
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Influence of obturation technique on penetration depth and adaptation of a bioceramic root canal sealer.

Authors:  Lohita Dasari; Anupreeta Anwarullah; Jyothi Mandava; Ravi Kumar Konagala; Srujana Karumuri; Praveen Kumar Chellapilla
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2021-02-10

Review 9.  Physico-Chemical Properties of Calcium-Silicate vs. Resin Based Sealers-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laboratory-Based Studies.

Authors:  Viresh Chopra; Graham Davis; Aylin Baysan
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Comparison of Dentinal Tubule Penetration between a Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer with Ultrasonic Activation and an Epoxy Resin-Based Sealer: A Study Using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.

Authors:  Dani Song; Sung-Eun Yang
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-10-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.