Literature DB >> 30225642

Identification of novel recessive gene xa44(t) conferring resistance to bacterial blight races in rice by QTL linkage analysis using an SNP chip.

Suk-Man Kim1,2.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Using QTL analysis and fine mapping, the novel recessive gene xa44(t) conferring resistance to BB was identified and the expression level of the gene was confirmed through qRT-PCR analysis. Bacterial blight (BB) disease caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) is a major factor causing rice yield loss in most rice-cultivating countries, especially in Asia. The deployment of cultivars with resistance to BB is the most effective method to control the disease. However, the evolution of new Xoo or pathotypes altered by single-gene-dependent mutations often results in breakdown of resistance. Thus, efforts to identify novel R-genes with sustainable BB resistance are urgently needed. In this study, we identified three quantitative trait loci (QTLs) on chromosomes 1, 4, and 11, from an F2 population of 493 individuals derived from a cross between IR73571-3B-11-3-K3 and Ilpum using a 7K SNP chip. Of these QTLs, one major QTL, qBB_11, on chromosome 11 explained 61.58% of the total phenotypic variance in the population, with an LOD value of 113.59, based on SNPs 11964077 and 11985463. The single major R-gene, with recessive gene action, was designated xa44(t) and was narrowed down to a 120-kb segment flanked within 28.00 Mbp to 28.12 Mbp. Of nine ORFs present in the target region, two ORFs revealed significantly different expression levels of the candidate genes. These candidate genes (Os11g0690066 and Os11g0690466) are described as "serine/threonine protein kinase domain containing protein" and "hypothetical protein," respectively. The results will be useful to further understand BB resistance mechanisms and provide new sources of resistance, together with DNA markers for MAS breeding to improve BB resistance in rice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30225642      PMCID: PMC6244528          DOI: 10.1007/s00122-018-3187-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


Introduction

Bacterial blight (BB) is one of the most devastating diseases in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and is caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo). The disease has been observed in rice-cultivation areas of Asia, the western coast of Africa, northern Australia, and Latin America, and yield loss due to BB in Asia is commonly reported as 20–30% in moderate conditions or up to 80% in certain environments (Reddy et al. 1979; Mew 1993; Nelson et al. 1994; Srinivasan and Gnanamanickam 2005). To prevent yield loss, the development of resistant varieties is suggested as the most effective method to control the disease without requiring collateral input from the farmer and having no environmental impact (McDowell and Woffenden 2003; Suh et al. 2009; Kim et al. 2015). However, the use of cultivars with a single major BB resistance gene (R-gene) results in resistance breakdown by pathogen evolution and variation (Vera Cruz et al. 2000; Korinsak et al. 2009; Kobayashi et al. 2014; Dilla-Ermita et al. 2017). Thus, identification of new R sources and the pyramiding of known R-genes are important methods to enhance sustainable and durable host resistance in the BB-resistant breeding program. In particular R-gene pyramiding is a useful method to maximize the use of known R-genes, which appear to durable and broad-spectrum resistance to various races or isolates of a specific pathogen (Kim et al. 2018). This R-gene combining approach with three or four genes were reported in various case of rice resistance breeding studies (Singh et al. 2001; Sundaram et al. 2008; Dokku et al. 2013; Suh et al. 2013; Pradhan et al. 2015). Xoo is a rod-shaped gram-negative bacterium that invades rice tissue through wounds, stomata, or hydathodes (Mew 1987). The disease caused by Xoo is vascular, leading to a systemic infection that spreads from the leaf tips and margins, eventually releasing a milky ooze that dries into yellow droplets. In seedlings, plants are killed by BB within 2–3 weeks after infestation, exhibiting kresek, which occurs when the leaves dry out and wilt. In contrast, adult plants may survive, but rice yield and quality are diminished. The disease is prevalent in both tropical and temperate climates with warm (25–30 °C), humid, deep water, and rainy climates, which are beneficial for the spread of this disease, but not commonly found in North America (Sharma et al. 2017). In addition, severe winds causing wounds and excessive nitrogen fertilization also represent favorable conditions for the spread of the disease. Adhikari et al. (1995) assessed the diversity of Xoo using 308 BB strains from various Asian countries. The cluster analysis revealed 5 distinct genetic clusters from the collection, and seven pathotypes were determined by inoculation of five differential cultivars with the R-gene, demonstrating tight correspondence between clusters and national or regional origin (Adhikari et al. 1995). To date, approximately 43 genes conferring resistance to BB have been identified from various rice sources derived from Oryza sativa, wild relatives of rice and artificially induced mutants (Busungu et al. 2016; Dilla-Ermita et al. 2017). Approximately 62% of the total genes are dominant, including incomplete dominant genes, and 16 genes act in a recessive manner (xa5, xa8, xa9, xa13, xa15, xa19, xa20, xa24, xa25, xa26b, xa28, xa31, xa32, xa33, xa34, and xa42) (Chen et al. 2011; Liang et al. 2017; Vikal and Bhatia 2017). Among the reported BB R-genes, only nine R-genes (Xa1, Xa3/Xa26, xa5, xa13, Xa10, Xa21, Xa23, xa25, and Xa27) have been characterized and functionally analyzed, revealing multiple mechanisms of R-gene-mediated Xoo resistance (Song et al. 1995; Iyer and Mccouch 2004; Sun et al. 2004; Gu et al. 2005; Chu et al. 2006; Tian et al. 2014). Xa4, Xa7, Xa22, Xa30, Xa31, Xa33, xa34, Xa35, Xa39, Xa40, xa42, and Xa42 loci were identified by fine mapping, and various ORFs within target regions were nominated as candidate genes explaining the trait. The BB R-genes are evenly distributed throughout the 12 rice chromosomes. Of these genes, 8 are clustered on chromosome 11, whereas genes have not been reported on chromosomes 1, 9, and 10. While the use of BB-resistant cultivars is crucial to control the disease, resistance induced by a single major gene is easily reversed by pathogenic variation or evolution. Therefore, combining known R-genes has been recommended by many researchers as a promising strategy to reinforce durable resistance to BB, but accumulating multiple R-genes is difficult to achieve simply using phenotypic selection in conventional breeding programs. Given advancements in molecular technology, DNA markers associated with R-genes are being used for foreground selection or gene pyramiding to improve resistance in elite lines. Linkage or association mapping offers practical help to detect novel R-genes based on high-density DNA marker sets. Recently, the introduction of more efficient and cost effective marker systems assaying single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers enables high-resolution genotyping for breeding applications in numerous crop species, including rice (Thomson et al. 2012). This technological progress facilitates association mapping, linkage mapping, and marker-assisted selection (MAS) (McCouch et al. 2010; Tung et al. 2010). In this study, we report the use of QTL mapping resulting in the identification of a new recessive R-gene for BB resistance from IR73571-3B-11-3-K3 (P6). Evaluation of the degree of resistance of tested varieties was first performed using a range of BB isolates. Based on these results, mapping populations were developed to identify the resistant locus associated with BB resistance by QTL analysis using a 7-K SNP marker set. Key candidate genes known to be influential factors in plant–pathogen interactions were identified by PCR-based markers to identify new BB recessive R-genes.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

A total of 493 F2 individuals were produced from a cross between P6 and Ilpum and used for QTL analysis based on genotyping using the SNP chip and phenotyping based on bioassays. The parent P6 is one of eight parents from the japonica Multi-parent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross (JMAGIC) population (Bandillo et al. 2013) that exhibits resistance to Korean BB races and tolerance to salt stress. The other parent, Ilpum, is a high-quality japonica cultivar (cv.) from Korea that lacks any BB R-genes. Some F1 plants were also backcrossed with Ilpum to generate BC1F1 plants. F1 and BC1F1 plants were selected by PCR using SSR markers, and the BC1F2 population was produced by self-pollination.

DNA extraction and PCR

DNA samples of plant materials were prepared at a final concentration of 50 ng/µl following the procedure described by Murray and Thompson (1980) with minor modifications and treated with RNAse I at 37 °C for 1 h for SNP genotyping. The concentrations of DNA samples were assessed using the Nanodrop ND 1000-spectro-photometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Wilmington, NC, USA) for nucleic acid quantification, and the quality of DNA samples was confirmed by visualization on 1.5% agarose gel. The PCR reaction was performed in an AllInOneCycler (BIONEER, Korea) in a total volume of 25 µl with 10 ng genomic DNA, 0.25–5 µM SSR primer, 200 µM dNTP mix, PCR buffer (containing 50 mM KCl, 10 mM TRIS–Cl (pH 8.3), 3 mM MgCl), and 0.5 U of taq polymerase. The PCR profile was performed at an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 8 min, followed by 32 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 or 60 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 8 min.

Phenotyping through bioassay

To evaluate the resistance of the population to BB isolate HB1009 (K3a), the leaf-clipping method (Kauffman et al. 1973) was used at the maximum tillering stage of plants. The inoculation was performed in a paddy field (F2 and F1) and under green house (BC1F2) conditions. According to the standard evaluation methods of the Rural Development Administration (RDA), Korea (RDA 2012), the average lesion length due to leaf damage of three leaves was measured 14 days after the inoculation. Plants with a lesion length of < 3 cm were categorized as resistance (R), whereas those with a lesion length of > 5 cm were categorized as susceptibility (S). For cases with lesion lengths within 3–5 cm, the plants were moderate resistance (MR). Both of R and MR were considered as resistant type in this study.

Genotyping and linkage mapping

The Infinium 7K BeadChip composed of 384 SNP sets customized for the indica-japonica SNP chip (ID: GS0011862-OPA) was used for genotyping. To construct a linkage map of the tested population, SNPs exhibiting polymorphisms between P6 and Ilpum were selected by the parental survey. Some SNPs were removed because segregation distortion appeared within SNPs, or anchored positions overlapped with each other. Compared with the expected segregation ratio (1:2:1), segregation distortion was identified using the MAP functionality of QTL IciMapping version 4.0 software (Meng et al. 2015). Based on quality standards for SNPs, only appropriate SNPs were selected and used to construct a genetic linkage map of the mapping population.

QTL mapping

QTL analysis was conducted using conventional interval mapping for additive QTL (IM-ADD) and inclusive composite interval mapping for additive QTL (ICIM-ADD). Significance thresholds were determined using 1000 permutations defined at P ≤ 0.05. “By LOD” and “By Input” functional options in the IciMapping program referred to the grouping and ordering of anchored SNPs. Mapping distance was calculated by recombination frequency using the Kosambi mapping function. For QTL mapping, genotypic data from SNPs and phenotypic data from measurement of lesion length of damaged lines were combined to detect QTLs related to resistance to BB.

Devolvement of markers to narrow down the target region

Additional DNA markers were developed within the target region to perform fine mapping. A total of 125 PCR-based DNA markers (Supplementary Table 1) were tested to identify polymorphisms in parents of the mapping population. Nine DNA markers within the region were then selected from the Rice Annotation Project Database (RAP-DB, http://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/). Markers for detecting InDel polymorphisms were developed within the target region using the DNA polymorphism database (Shen et al. 2004). To design primers for InDel markers, we followed the method of Kim et al. 2015. CAP markers were developed by direct sequencing of the PCR amplicon to identify specific sites for restriction enzyme using NEBcutter 2.0 (Vincze et al. 2003).

RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from rice seedlings using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The amfiRivert cDNA Synthesis Platinum Master Mix (GenDEPOT, Barker, TX, USA) was used for cDNA synthesis according to protocols provided by the manufacturer. Diluted cDAN was analyzed by using Stratagene MX3005P qPCR System (Agilent) and amfiSure qGreen Q-PCR Master Mix (GenDEPOT, Barker, TX, USA) for gene expression. To evaluate transcript levels, the rice eEF1-α gene was used as an internal control for qRT-PCR data normalization (Yokotani et al. 2013). Each set of experiments was repeated three times, and the ddCT relative quantification method was used to evaluate the quantitative variation. Primers used to amplify the selected genes are listed in Supplementary Table 4.

Results

Screening leaf reactions to different BB isolates

BB R-donors P6 and P8 were resistant to BB race K3a, and R-gene loci detected from both donors were delimited by the same flanking markers noted in our previous GWAS analysis (not published). We then sought to determine whether these donors contained different R-genes. To determine the race specificity of R-gene(s) from each strain against the BB isolates, the leaf-clipping inoculation method was performed with a total of 24 BB isolates from Korea (Table 1). Of 24 isolates the R-donor P6 exhibited resistance (≦ 5 cm) to 20 isolates but was susceptible (> 5 cm) to four isolates, HB3055, 3079, 4024, and HB4044. P8 was resistance to all tested isolates. No differences in R-reactions were noted between P8 and 11325, which harbors Xa40 closely linked to the detected position. Based on the leaf-reaction results, P6 exhibited resistance to greater than 20 isolates, but obvious differences in resistance to HB3055, 3079, 4024, and HB4044 were noted in P8 and 11325. Leaf-reaction results confirmed that Ilpum was susceptible to all tested isolates (Table 1).
Table 1

Leaf reactions of four lines to 24 BB isolates 14 days after inoculation. The three lines P6, P8, and 11325 are resistant to BB isolate K3a (HB1009), and Ilpum is used as a control for susceptibility. Average lesion length was obtained after measuring three leaves

IsolateLesion length of tested line and cultivars to 24 BB isolates (cm)
P6P811325Ilpum
HB10093.0 ± 2.31.5 ± 0.81.8 ± 0.512.0 ± 2.0
HB10132.5 ± 0.02.0 ± 0.01.0 ± 2.210.1 ± 3.1
HB10140.5 ± 1.70.5 ± 0.04.0 ± 2.27.7 ± 3.1
HB10154.0 ± 0.02.0 ± 0.71.3 ± 2.08.0 ± 0.8
HB20100.5 ± 0.60.5 ± 1.21.0 ± 0.110.0 ± 4.5
HB20245.5 ± 1.02.5 ± 2.03.7 ± 1.512.5 ± 5.2
HB20384.3 ± 0.03.5 ± 0.22.0 ± 2.012.3 ± 3.2
HB30110.5 ± 2.40.7 ± 0.15.0 ± 1.810.3 ± 3.0
HB30344.8 ± 1.24.5 ± 1.86.5 ± 0.512.3 ± 2.0
HB3055 9.0 ± 2.4 3.5 ± 1.7 4.5 ± 0.710.3 ± 3.1
HB3079 10.0 ± 1.2 2.5 ± 0.7 3.5 ± 0.711.3 ± 5.5
HB4024 20.0 ± 4.2 3.3 ± 1.5 1.0 ± 0.0 a
HB40270.5 ± 0.30.5 ± 0.03.5 ± 0.06.0 ± 2.6
HB40306.3 ± 3.53.5 ± 0.76.0 ± 2.112.5 ± 3.5
HB40325.5 ± 2.83.5 ± 0.74.0 ± 2.810.3 ± 3.2
HB40406.0 ± 0.04.0 ± 1.42.5 ± 1.410.0 ± 1.0
HB4044 7.0 ± 2.8 3.7 ± 0.5 2.3 ± 2.111.0 ± 2.6
HB40525.0 ± 3.54.8 ± 0.32.0 ± 0.57.5 ± 0.7
HB40747.5 ± 2.44.0 ± 0.02.0 ± 1.712.3 ± 2.5
HB40795.0 ± 0.75.0 ± 1.44.0 ± 0.08.5 ± 0.7
HB40844.5 ± 4.94.0 ± 0.02.5 ± 1.711.3 ± 5.7
HB40876.5 ± 1.44.8 ± 2.02.3 ± 2.16.0 ± 2.8
HB50044.0 ± 2.14.0 ± 2.43.3 ± 0.58.5 ± 3.0
HB61425.5 ± 2.13.5 ± 0.73.5 ± 1.4

Bold indicates a different reaction among P6, P8, and 11325

aIs missing data

Leaf reactions of four lines to 24 BB isolates 14 days after inoculation. The three lines P6, P8, and 11325 are resistant to BB isolate K3a (HB1009), and Ilpum is used as a control for susceptibility. Average lesion length was obtained after measuring three leaves Bold indicates a different reaction among P6, P8, and 11325 aIs missing data

Development of the mapping population and R-gene inheritance

To determine the R-gene associated with the resistance of P6, a total of 493 F2 individuals were produced from a cross between P6 as the R-donor and the japonica cultivar (cv.) Ilpum that does not harbor any BB R-genes. To narrow down the target region associated with the R-gene, 42 BC1F1 individuals were developed by a backcross. Ten BC1F1 plants selected from the genotype survey using SSR markers were self-pollinated to generate the BC1F2 population. A total of 520 BC1F2 individuals were used for fine mapping of the target region associated with the R-gene. Phenotyping by measurement of lesion length was performed using each of the F2 individuals. The population had a lesion length ranging from 0.1 to 30 cm 14 days after inoculation (DAI). Based on the standard evaluation method, the plants segregated phenotypically as 127 resistant and 366 susceptible lines, fitting the expected phenotypic ratio of 1:3, with X2= 0.15 and P = 0.69 (P > 0.05) (Table 2). For the BC1F2 population, the segregation ratio also followed the expected segregation ratio for a recessive gene of 1:3 (R:S), with X2= 1.22 and P = 0.26 (P > 0.05) (Table 2). These findings confirmed a single recessive resistance gene conferring Xoo resistance in P6.
Table 2

Genetic analysis of BB-resistant response of F2 and BC1F2 from the cross between P6 and Ilpum against the BB race K3a

Cross (generation)Number of RNumber of STotal numberSegregation ratio X 2 P
P6/Ilpum (F2)1273664931:30.150.69
P6/Ilpum (BC1F2)1153885031:31.220.26
Genetic analysis of BB-resistant response of F2 and BC1F2 from the cross between P6 and Ilpum against the BB race K3a

Linkage mapping

A total of 7098 SNPs were first used to construct a linkage map for the F2 mapping population. From the 7K SNP chip analysis, a total of 6658 SNPs were called from the analysis and used for the linkage mapping. Using the parental survey, SNPs exhibiting polymorphic patterns between parents were selected, and heterologous SNPs and deletion and insertion types were removed. From this process, 2983 SNPs were used to construct the linkage map, for an average polymorphism rate of 42.0%. On average, 248 SNPs were anchored on each rice chromosome by QTL IciMapping (Table 3, Fig. 1a). Using linkage map information supported by the software, we detected 1029 redundant SNPs that overlapped the same position on each chromosome with a 0-cM interval. The linkage map was ultimately constructed with a total of 1954 SNPs, with approximately 163 SNPs anchored in each chromosome on average (Table 3).
Table 3

Distribution of SNPs on 12 rice chromosomes exhibiting polymorphisms in the parental survey

ChromosomeTested markersPolymorphic markersPolymorphic rate (%)Selected markerSelected rate (%)
Chr 185037343.917620.7
Chr 266027341.410415.8
Chr 368336553.423434.3
Chr 464625539.517827.6
Chr 550921943.018035.4
Chr 655132358.617832.3
Chr 75248917.07213.7
Chr 854521940.214827.2
Chr 945519342.415734.5
Chr 1047221846.215833.5
Chr 1163128445.018429.2
Chr 1257226346.018532.3
Total7098298342.0195427.5
Fig. 1

Histogram of lesion length of plants tested using the BB race K3a. Plants were classified as resistant when it had lesion length of less than 5 cm at 14 DAI, and this classification includes both resistant and moderately resistant plants. R-donor P6 was resistant to K3a, with lesion lengths of less than 2.5 cm, and Ilpum was susceptible, with lesion lengths greater than 10 cm. F1 plants exhibited lesion lengths in the range of 5–7.5 cm

Distribution of SNPs on 12 rice chromosomes exhibiting polymorphisms in the parental survey Histogram of lesion length of plants tested using the BB race K3a. Plants were classified as resistant when it had lesion length of less than 5 cm at 14 DAI, and this classification includes both resistant and moderately resistant plants. R-donor P6 was resistant to K3a, with lesion lengths of less than 2.5 cm, and Ilpum was susceptible, with lesion lengths greater than 10 cm. F1 plants exhibited lesion lengths in the range of 5–7.5 cm

QTL analysis

The distribution of BB damage of the F2 mapping population revealed a wide range of lesion lengths (Fig. 2). Genotypes of the population were analyzed using 1954 SNPs out of 7K SNP chips and were calculated along with the phenotypic data to detect QTLs associated with BB R-genes conferring resistance to Xoo. Three QTLs were detected on chromosomes 1, 4, and 11 (Table 4). Of these QTLs, QTLs on chromosomes 4 and 11 revealed a negative influence on the alleles derived from the BB-resistant parent P6, whereas the additive effects of qBB_1 were positive. One QTL, qBB_1, with an LOD score of 9.23 was detected within SNP-1.40447508 and SNP-1.40570714 on chromosome 1, explaining 2.97% of phenotypic variation (R2) in ICIM analysis. In addition, qBB_4, with an LOD of 7.63, was detected within flanking markers (4412887 and 4439600) on chromosome 4 with an R2 of 2.67. As a major QTL, qBB_11 detected on the long arm of chromosome 11 and was directly related to P6 resistance to the BB race K3a. The R2 explained 61.58% in ICIM analysis, with an LOD of 113.59, and this QTL harbored SNPs 11964077 and 11985463. The detected QTL was also confirmed to exhibit a mixture of an additive effect (− 5.39) and dominant effect (− 3.53).
Fig. 2

Linkage map and QTL analysis using F2 mapping population. a Genetic linkage map of the 12 chromosomes based on 1954 SNP markers segregating in the P6/Ilpum 493 F2 plants. Black dots beside chromosomes 1, 4, and 11 represent the positions of detected QTLs. b The LOD profile and additive effect of major QTL analyzed by inclusive composite interval mapping on chromosome 11. The SNP location was positioned in the whole genome. The positive additive effect was derived from the susceptible parent Ilpum, whereas the negative value was related to the resistant parent. The dotted line is LOD threshold calculated by 1000 permutations

Table 4

Putative QTLs associated with the BB R-gene from P6 detected by composite and interval mapping

AnalysisQTLsChrPosition (cM)L markerR makerLODR2 (%)AddDom
ICIM qBB_11 111601196407711985463113.5961.58− 5.39− 3.53
qBB_4 481441288744396007.632.67− 1.09− 0.27
qBB_1 1186SNP-1.40447508SNP-1.405707149.232.971.210.36

ICIM inclusive composite interval mapping, R2 percent phenotypic variation explained by the QTL, Add additive effect, Dom dominant effect

Linkage map and QTL analysis using F2 mapping population. a Genetic linkage map of the 12 chromosomes based on 1954 SNP markers segregating in the P6/Ilpum 493 F2 plants. Black dots beside chromosomes 1, 4, and 11 represent the positions of detected QTLs. b The LOD profile and additive effect of major QTL analyzed by inclusive composite interval mapping on chromosome 11. The SNP location was positioned in the whole genome. The positive additive effect was derived from the susceptible parent Ilpum, whereas the negative value was related to the resistant parent. The dotted line is LOD threshold calculated by 1000 permutations Putative QTLs associated with the BB R-gene from P6 detected by composite and interval mapping ICIM inclusive composite interval mapping, R2 percent phenotypic variation explained by the QTL, Add additive effect, Dom dominant effect

Identification of target regions

Additional DNA markers were developed to dissect the interval containing QTL qBB_11, which is defined by flanking markers 11964077 and 11985463 (Fig. 3a). Of 125 markers newly designed for fine mapping, nine were selected for fine mapping based on the parental survey. Six Nipponbare BAC clones (Load ID: OSJNBa0047M04, OSJNBa001L01, OSJNBa0036K13, OSJNBa0004O15, OSJNBa0059H21, and OSJNBa005C17) were located within in the target region within approximately ~ 490 Kbp, indicating the physical position (Fig. 3a). To delimit the physical location of the R-gene, BC1F2 individuals were used, and sixteen recombinants were finally selected through the analysis of discordance by genotyping and phenotyping. The selected DNA markers were arranged between flanking markers #STS1150/HinfI, and #21.RM27340, which are both close to the terminal position (Fig. 3b). According to the number of recombinant events, the target region was further narrowed down toward the left flanking marker #STS1150/HinfI. Thus, the R-gene is located in the flanking region of the approximately 120-Kbp segment delimited by two DNA markers #46. Os11g0689400 and #5. RM27318 (Fig. 3b). In the case of SSR marker RM27316, no recombinant event was found within the target region (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Table 3). Nine ORFs located in the target region were identified as candidate genes conferring resistance to BB (Supplementary Table 2). Two ORFs, Os11g0690066 and Os11g0690332, encoded proteins related to kinase domain, and the remaining seven ORFs encoded hypothetical protein and non-protein coding transcript, separately.
Fig. 3

Dissection of qBB_11 regions. a The physical position of anchored marker on the chromosome 11 present based on the Nipponbare genome. Three BB R-genes were clustered near the target region in which loci Xa40 and Xa3/26 were included. b The target region flanked by the STS marker #1.STS1150/HinfI and SSR marker #21.RM27340 from the QTL analysis. The number in brackets indicates the number of recombinant events detected among P6 × Ilpum BC1F2 individuals. c The loci of ORFs listed in the target region that resulted from the fine mapping based on RAP-DB (IRGSP-1.0). Nine candidates for the BB R-gene were included in approximately 120-Kbp of the target region

Dissection of qBB_11 regions. a The physical position of anchored marker on the chromosome 11 present based on the Nipponbare genome. Three BB R-genes were clustered near the target region in which loci Xa40 and Xa3/26 were included. b The target region flanked by the STS marker #1.STS1150/HinfI and SSR marker #21.RM27340 from the QTL analysis. The number in brackets indicates the number of recombinant events detected among P6 × Ilpum BC1F2 individuals. c The loci of ORFs listed in the target region that resulted from the fine mapping based on RAP-DB (IRGSP-1.0). Nine candidates for the BB R-gene were included in approximately 120-Kbp of the target region

Expression analysis of candidate genes in the target region

An additional primer set was designed to analyze expression levels of candidate genes based on genetic sequence using RAP-DB (Supplementary Table 4). Of nine candidate genes two genes, Os11g0690066 and Os11g0690466, exhibited up-regulation of expression levels in P6 were significantly higher than that in Ilpum (Fig. 4). The expression level of Os11g0690066 in P6 at 4 h after inoculation was observed as significantly up-regulated expression at a level of 11 times (3.48 of log2 fold changes) of the concentration at 0 h (Fig. 4a). In particular the expression level of Os110690466 was considerable increase at 2 h to soar at 4 h and maintained as it declined until 24 h (Fig. 4b). While remaining ORFs revealed no significant difference between both lines (data not shown).
Fig. 4

qRT-PCR analysis for gene expression pattern of P6 and Ilpum after BB inoculation. a mRNA expression levels of Os11g0690066 at six time-points (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24) after inoculations for both P6 and Ilpum rice varieties, respectively. b mRNA expression levels of Os11g0690466 at six time-points (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24) after inoculations for both P6 and Ilpum rice varieties, respectively

qRT-PCR analysis for gene expression pattern of P6 and Ilpum after BB inoculation. a mRNA expression levels of Os11g0690066 at six time-points (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24) after inoculations for both P6 and Ilpum rice varieties, respectively. b mRNA expression levels of Os11g0690466 at six time-points (0, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24) after inoculations for both P6 and Ilpum rice varieties, respectively

Discussion

BB is one of the main rice production constraints in many rice-growing areas. Currently, the development and deployment of resistant cultivars carrying major R-gene(s) represent the most effective method to control this rice disease. However, the high degree of pathogenic variation in Xoo often causes the breakdown of resistance to new virulent BB strains. Therefore, diversifying the germplasm is urgently needed through the identification of resistance genes from wild species and pyramiding two or more effective resistance genes in developing rice cultivars with sustainable BB resistance to Xoo. In this study, we developed an F2 population from a cross between the BB R-donor P6 and the susceptible japonica cv. Ilpum to detect the position of the R-gene conferring resistance to the BB race K3a by QTL analysis. To narrow down the detected target region, fine mapping was performed for the BC1F2 population using additional DNA markers. Based on the QTL analysis, one major QTL qBB_11 was identified at the end of chromosome 11, exhibiting a resistant response to the tested BB isolate. As a major single recessive R-gene, this gene has a high LOD value of 113.59, explaining 61.58% of the phenotypic variation. In previous studies, approximately 43 BB R-genes have been reported in rice cultivars, their wild relatives and mutant populations (Busungu et al. 2016). Although recessive resistance is relatively uncommon in plant bacterial systems, the ratio of recessive genes is approximately 38% in nature among all BB R-genes, and R-genes are distributed on various chromosomes, such as chromosome 1 (xa34), chromosome 2 (xa24), chromosome 3 (xa42), chromosome 4 (xa31), chromosome 5 (xa5), chromosome 6 (xa33), chromosome 7 (xa8), chromosome 8 (xa13), chromosome 11 (xa9), and chromosome 12 (xa25) (Korinsak et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2011; Liang et al. 2017). In addition, three recessive R-genes xa15, xa19, and xa20 were induced in mutant lines (Vikal and Bhatia 2017), and two R-genes xa26 and xa28 were identified by genetic analysis (Lee et al. 2003). To date, only nine R-genes have been isolated and cloned, including Xa1, Xa3/Xa26, xa5, Xa10, xa13, Xa21, Xa23, xa25, and Xa27, and five types of proteins are encoded by these genes (Gu et al. 2004; Iyer and Mccouch 2004; Sun et al. 2004; Liu et al. 2011; Tian et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2015). Among these genes, three recessive R-genes have been characterized. The recessive gene xa5 encodes the gamma subunit of transcription factor IIA, and recessive gene xa13 encodes a novel plasma membrane protein that originated from the aus genotype (Iyer and Mccouch 2004; Chu et al. 2006; Iyer-Pascuzzi and McCouch 2007). The recessive gene xa25 derived from sativa spp. indica encodes a nodulin MtN3 family protein essential for reproductive development and rice–Xoo interaction (Liu et al. 2011). Six recessive R-genes (xa8, xa24, xa31, xa33, xa34, and xa42) were identified by fine genetic mapping. In this study, we identified a new recessive BB R-gene designated xa44(t) and detected the locus on chromosome 11 by fine mapping. In addition, the locus of the R-gene detected in this study contains a closely linked cluster of at least three R-genes that were identified in a nearby region as Xa3/Xa26, Xa4 and Xa40. In particular, Xa3 and Xa40 were included within the target region (Fig. 3a). However, the R-gene xa44(t) recessively segregated to the BB isolate comparing adjoining dominant R-genes Xa3 and Xa40, and Xa3 was particularly susceptible to the BB race K3a (Kim et al. 2015). Thus, bioassays were performed to confirm BB isolate specificity with another R-gene, Xa40, using 24 isolates in Korea (Table 1). The result showed that xa44(t) and the other R-genes exhibited different R-reactions to four of the tested isolates. As a major QTL, qBB_11 was eventually identified by linkage analysis, and six Nipponbare BAC clones (OSJNBa0047M04, OSJNBa0018L01, OSJNBa0036K13, OSJNBa0004O15, OSJNBa0059H21, and OSJNBa005C17) were included in the detected target region of approximately 490-Kbp. To further narrow down the target region flanked by SNPs, additional PCR-based markers were developed within the target region and selected by the parent survey. Through fine mapping using 520 BC1F2 individuals, the R-gene xa44(t) was delimited to an approximately 120-Kbp segment flanked by DNA markers # 46.g0689400 and RM 27318, and nine putative ORFs involved with the R-gene were identified based on the current gene annotation (Fig. 3b, c; Supplementary Table 2). To confirm the candidate gene xa44(t), qRT-PCR was performed using new primer set designed based on the exons of candidates (Supplementary Table 4). Expression levels of two genes Os11g0690066 (Os11g0690154) and Os11g069466 were significantly higher than that of Ilpum (Fig. 4). Os11g0690066 encoded a “serine/threonine protein kinase domain containing protein,” which is known as an influential factor in plant–pathogen interactions (Cao et al. 2011; Lee and Kim 2015). The protein serine/threonine kinase encoded by the candidate has been reported in several crops on disease resistance. BB R-gene Xa21 in rice (Liu et al. 2002), barley stem rust R-gene Rpg5 (Brueggeman et al. 2008), tomato bacterial speck disease R-gene Pto (Martin et al. 1993), wheat stripe rust R-gene Yr36 (Fu et al. 2009) are related to the protein. Further Os11g0690466 encoding a hypothetical protein was shown to have a much higher expression level in P6 than that of Os11g0690066. However, the function of Os11g0690466 is difficult to define due to lack of identity to protein sequences with annotated biochemical function. In addition, we are also considering possibility that two genes can be actually a single gene due to false annotation like case of Bph18 (Ji et al. 2016). Given the results of the fine mapping and qRT-PCR, it is highly likely that the two ORFs are related to BB resistance of xa44(t). In this study, we identified a new BB recessive R-gene designated xa44(t) by QTL analysis and fine mapping using various molecular markers sets. PCR-based DNA markers tightly linked to the R-gene were developed for MAS, and key ORFs were suggested as likely candidates for xa44(t). These will be especially useful for BB breeding programs as the R-gene exhibits resistance to the four main BB races, K1, K2, K3, and K3a, which represent approximately 95% of races in Korea, conferring broad-spectrum resistance to Xoo in Korea. The results provide further useful information to understand BB resistance mechanisms and provide DNA markers for MAS breeding to improve BB resistance in rice. Further studies to characterize xa44(t) gene structure, protein sequence, and biochemical function will be required.

Author Contribution statement

SMK carried out all researches regarding the study and drafted the manuscript. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (PDF 318 kb)
  33 in total

Review 1.  Plant disease resistance genes: recent insights and potential applications.

Authors:  John M McDowell; Bonnie J Woffenden
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 19.536

2.  NEBcutter: A program to cleave DNA with restriction enzymes.

Authors:  Tamas Vincze; Janos Posfai; Richard J Roberts
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  The stem rust resistance gene Rpg5 encodes a protein with nucleotide-binding-site, leucine-rich, and protein kinase domains.

Authors:  R Brueggeman; A Druka; J Nirmala; T Cavileer; T Drader; N Rostoks; A Mirlohi; H Bennypaul; U Gill; D Kudrna; C Whitelaw; A Kilian; F Han; Y Sun; K Gill; B Steffenson; A Kleinhofs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Correction to: Developing japonica rice introgression lines with multiple resistance genes for brown planthopper, bacterial blight, rice blast, and rice stripe virus using molecular breeding.

Authors:  Suk-Man Kim; Russell Reinke; Bo-Kyeong Kim
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA.

Authors:  M G Murray; W F Thompson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1980-10-10       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  XA23 is an executor R protein and confers broad-spectrum disease resistance in rice.

Authors:  Chunlian Wang; Xiaoping Zhang; Yinglun Fan; Ying Gao; Qinlong Zhu; Chongke Zheng; Tengfei Qin; Yanqiang Li; Jinying Che; Mingwei Zhang; Bing Yang; Yaoguang Liu; Kaijun Zhao
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 13.164

7.  Genetic Diversity of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in Asia.

Authors:  T B Adhikari; C Cruz; Q Zhang; R J Nelson; D Z Skinner; T W Mew; J E Leach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Inheritance of resistance to bacterial blight in 21 cultivars of rice.

Authors:  K S Lee; S Rasabandith; E R Angeles; G S Khush
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Identification and linkage analysis of a new rice bacterial blight resistance gene from XM14, a mutant line from IR24.

Authors:  Constantine Busungu; Satoru Taura; Jun-Ichi Sakagami; Katsuyuki Ichitani
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) populations in rice: progress and potential for genetics research and breeding.

Authors:  Nonoy Bandillo; Chitra Raghavan; Pauline Andrea Muyco; Ma Anna Lynn Sevilla; Irish T Lobina; Christine Jade Dilla-Ermita; Chih-Wei Tung; Susan McCouch; Michael Thomson; Ramil Mauleon; Rakesh Kumar Singh; Glenn Gregorio; Edilberto Redoña; Hei Leung
Journal:  Rice (N Y)       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 4.783

View more
  14 in total

1.  Selection of Optimized Reference Genes for qRT-PCR Normalization in Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris Cultured in Different Media.

Authors:  Xia Yan; Qiaoling Zhang; Jun Zou; Chaozu He; Jun Tao
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 2.  A review of approaches to control bacterial leaf blight in rice.

Authors:  Daniel Ruben Akiola Sanya; Sharifah Farhana Syed-Ab-Rahman; Aiqun Jia; Djamila Onésime; Kyung-Min Kim; Bonaventure Cohovi Ahohuendo; Jason R Rohr
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Exploring of bacterial blight resistance in landraces and mining of resistant gene(s) using molecular markers and pathogenicity approach.

Authors:  Touhidur Rahman Anik; Mohammad Abdul Latif; Sheikh Arafat Islam Nihad; Md Al-Imran Hasan; Mohammad Ahasan Hossain; Md Mamunur Rashid; Mohammad Ashik Iqbal Khan; Krishna Pada Halder
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2022-02-25

4.  High-resolution genetic mapping of a novel bacterial blight resistance gene xa-45(t) identified from Oryza glaberrima and transferred to Oryza sativa.

Authors:  Kumari Neelam; Ritu Mahajan; Vikas Gupta; Dharminder Bhatia; Baljeet Kaur Gill; Ratika Komal; Jagjeet Singh Lore; Gurjit Singh Mangat; Kuldeep Singh
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Xa1 Allelic R Genes Activate Rice Blight Resistance Suppressed by Interfering TAL Effectors.

Authors:  Chonghui Ji; Zhiyuan Ji; Bo Liu; He Cheng; Hua Liu; Sanzhen Liu; Bing Yang; Gongyou Chen
Journal:  Plant Commun       Date:  2020-06-20

6.  Genome-Wide Association Study Dissects Resistance Loci against Bacterial Blight in a Diverse Rice Panel from the 3000 Rice Genomes Project.

Authors:  Jialing Lu; Chunchao Wang; Dan Zeng; Jianmin Li; Xiaorong Shi; Yingyao Shi; Yongli Zhou
Journal:  Rice (N Y)       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 4.783

7.  Reciprocal adaptation of rice and Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae: cross-species 2D GWAS reveals the underlying genetics.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Zhiqiang Hu; Zhichao Wu; Jialing Lu; Yingyao Shi; Jianlong Xu; Xiyin Wang; Jinpeng Wang; Fan Zhang; Mingming Wang; Xiaorong Shi; Yanru Cui; Casiana Vera Cruz; Dalong Zhuo; Dandan Hu; Min Li; Wensheng Wang; Xiuqin Zhao; Tianqing Zheng; Binying Fu; Jauhar Ali; Yongli Zhou; Zhikang Li
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Genome-Wide Association Mapping and Gene Expression Analysis Reveal the Negative Role of OsMYB21 in Regulating Bacterial Blight Resistance in Rice.

Authors:  Wu Yang; Junliang Zhao; Shaohong Zhang; Luo Chen; Tifeng Yang; Jingfang Dong; Hua Fu; Yamei Ma; Lian Zhou; Jian Wang; Wei Liu; Qing Liu; Bin Liu
Journal:  Rice (N Y)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.783

9.  OsNPR3.3-dependent salicylic acid signaling is involved in recessive gene xa5-mediated immunity to rice bacterial blight.

Authors:  Guanghuai Jiang; Dedong Yin; Yue Shi; Zhuangzhi Zhou; Chunrong Li; Pengcheng Liu; Yanfeng Jia; Yanyan Wang; Zhenzhen Liu; Minxiang Yu; Xianghong Wu; Wenxue Zhai; Lihuang Zhu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A novel locus from the wild allotetraploid rice species Oryza latifolia Desv. confers bacterial blight (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae) resistance in rice (O. sativa).

Authors:  Rosalyn B Angeles-Shim; Junghyun Shim; Ricky B Vinarao; Ruby S Lapis; Joshua J Singleton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.