| Literature DB >> 30224987 |
Zhenfei Huang1, Zhihong Wu1,2, Bupeng Ma1,2, Lingjia Yu1, Yu He1, Derong Xu1, Yuanhao Wu2, Hai Wang1, Guixing Qiu1.
Abstract
Titanium (Entities:
Keywords: dopamine-assisted coating; osteogenesis; superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles
Year: 2018 PMID: 30224987 PMCID: PMC6124053 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.172033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Scheme 1.Schematic illustration of PDA-assisted immobilization of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on surfaces of titanium substrates.
Figure 1.SEM image of Fe3O4 nanoparticles (a); Fe3O4 nanoparticles exhibited excellent colloidal stability in water (b); Fe3O4 nanoparticles are superparamagnetic at room temperature (c).
Figure 2.EDS data for (a) pTi, (b) PDA@pTi, (c) Fe3O4/PDA@pTi. The presence of nitrogen, iron elements in the EDS indicated that PDA and Fe3O4 nanoparticles were successfully immobilized on surfaces of titanium substrates.
Figure 3.EDS elemental mapping of the area enclosed by a square in SEM image showing the distribution of Ti, C, O, N and Fe elements over the different surfaces of titanium substrates ((a) pTi, (b) PDA@pTi, (c) Fe3O4/PDA@pTi).
Figure 4.Structural properties of immobilization on surfaces: (a) macroscopic view of pTi, PDA@pTi and Fe3O4/PDA@pTi; (b) SEM image of pTi surface; (c) SEM image of PDA@pTi surface and (d) SEM image of Fe3O4/PDA@pTi surface.
Figure 5.Water contact angle measurement for the (a) pTi, (b) PDA@pTi, (c) Fe3O4/PDA@pTi. (d) Average water contact angle analysis. Surface AFM images of the (e) pTi, (f) PDA@pTi, (g) Fe3O4/PDA@pTi. (h) Surface roughness analysis. For each group, n = 3; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 6.Magnetic properties of the titanium substrates analysed by a magnetization hysteresis curve. The sphere (red) represents Fe3O4/PDA@pTi; the triangle (blue) represents pTi.
Figure 7.Adhesion stability of the PDA layer and Fe3O4 nanoparticles on surfaces of titanium substrates. PDA-assisted titanum substrates were investigated by SEM before (a) and after (b) exposure to ultrasonication in a water bath for 1 h.
Figure 8.(a) Fluorescence images of LIVE/DEAD staining of BMSCs cells after culturing for 1, 3 and 7 days on the surfaces of Fe3O4/PDA@pTi, PDA@pTi and pTi. (b) ImageJ analysis of cell adhesion efficiency. For each group, n = 6; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 9.Measurement of BMSCs cells proliferation by CCK-8 assay after 1, 3 and 7 days incubation. For each group, n = 3; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 10.Fluorescent staining of BMSCs cells adhered on (a) pTi, (b) PDA@pTi, (c) Fe3O4/PDA@pTi after culturing for 1 day. BMSCs cells morphology analysis (d). For each group, n = 6; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 11.SEM images of BMSCs cells cultured on (a) pTi, (b) PDA@pTi, (c) Fe3O4/PDA@pTi for 2 days. Red arrows indicate cells grown on the surfaces of the titanium substrates, and black arrows indicate lamellipodia extensions.
Figure 12.ALP activity of BMCSs cells cultured on the pTi, PDA@pTi and Fe3O4/PDA@pTi arrays after osteogenic induction for 7 and 14 days. For each group, n = 3; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 13.Relative mRNA expression of ALP (a), OCN (b) and RUNX2 (c). For each group, n = 3; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 14.ARS staining of fixed cells on the surface of (a) pTi, (b) PDA@pTi and (c) Fe3O4/PDA@pTi.