Literature DB >> 24030698

Super-paramagnetic responsive nanofibrous scaffolds under static magnetic field enhance osteogenesis for bone repair in vivo.

Jie Meng1, Bo Xiao, Yu Zhang, Jian Liu, Huadan Xue, Jing Lei, Hua Kong, Yuguang Huang, Zhengyu Jin, Ning Gu, Haiyan Xu.   

Abstract

A novel nanofibrous composite scaffold composed of super-paramagnetic γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles (MNP), hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (nHA) and poly lactide acid (PLA) was prepared using electrospinning technique. The scaffold well responds extern static magnetic field with typical saturation magnetization value of 0.049 emu/g as well as possesses nanofibrous architecture. The scaffolds were implanted in white rabbit model of lumbar transverse defects. Permanent magnets are fixed in the rabbit cages to provide static magnetic field for the rabbits post surgery. Results show that MNP incorporated in the nanofibers endows the scaffolds super-paramagnetic responsive under the applied static magnetic field, which accelerates new bone tissue formation and remodeling in the rabbit defect. The scaffold also exhibits good compatibility of CK, Cr, ALT and ALP within normal limits in the serum within 110 days post implantation. In conclusion, the super-paramagnetic responding scaffold with applying of external magnetic field provides a novel strategy for scaffold-guided bone repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24030698      PMCID: PMC3772377          DOI: 10.1038/srep02655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Bone repair by scaffold-guiding regeneration is widely demanded in critical size bone defects resulted from trauma, tumor, resection and skeletal abnormalities. Successful regeneration largely depends on interface interactions between bone related cells and scaffolds. Although varieties of scaffolds for bone regeneration have been investigated as alternatives to autologous or allogeneic bone grafts12345, there is still large space for improvement to meet clinical requirements. Osteoblast cell is one kind of bone related effector cells, and in particular, they are mechanical sensitive. It has been accepted that bone tissue responds to mechanical stimulation with bone formation and inhibition of bone resorption6. Therefore, proper physical stimulation can play positive roles in osteogenesis. Some mechanical stimulators such as stress, strain, strain energy, and strain rate have been demonstrated enhancement to bone regeneration and fracture healing7891011. Besides mechanical force stimuli above mentioned, magnetic stimulation originated from static or alternative magnetic fields has constantly attracted researchers' interests as well. For instances, several groups reported that weak magnetic or pulse electromagnetic fields of Gauss order are one effective stimuli that promoted bone fracture healing, spinal fusion, bone ingrowths into ceramics in animal models121314151617181920. Strong static magnetic field of 5–10 T was also reported to have the potency of regulating the orientation of matrix proteins and cells in vitro and in vivo212223242526272829303132. Regarding to the beneficial effects of magnetic fields on bone fracture healing and new bone formation, we consider introducing magnetic stimulation into nanofibrous scaffolds that have been widely used for bone tissue repair. Iron oxide nanoparticles show a super-paramagnetic behavior33, this property is still preserved as nanocomposite materials based on a polyester matrix incorporating iron oxide nanoparticles are considered34. We previously reported that a nanofibrous composite composed of super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MNP), hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (nHA) and poly lactide acid (PLA) produces super-paramagnetic responses under an applied static magnetic field and accelerates proliferation and differentiation of osteoblast cells in vitro in reference to the nanofibrous scaffold without MNP under the same magnetic field35. In the nanofibrous composite, MNP is used to give super-paramagnetic response, nHA is for bone conductivity and PLA for nanofibers fabrication. Other researchers also reported that porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds containing magnetic nanoparticles enhance the osteoblast cells growth in vitro when a magnetic field is applied to the cell culture system3637. Another composite composed of a polyester matrix magnetically functionalized with iron oxide nanoparticles shows a good ability to support and enhance osteogenic differentiate of mesenchimal stem cells38. Nevertheless, in vivo study for the new bone-formation enhancement mediated by magnetic or super-paramagnetic responsive composites has been rarely reported, that is necessary and crucial for clinical applications of the composites. The aim of this work is to validate in vivo osteogenesis enhancement of the super-paramagnetic nanofibrous scaffold synergizing with external static magnetic field. The scaffolds were implanted in the lumbar transverse defect of New Zealand white rabbits. External static magnetic field was applied by fixing permanent magnets to the rabbit cages of opposite sides. The osteogenesis effect of the scaffold synergizing with the statistic field was investigated within 110 days post implantation surgery by CT scan analysis, micro-CT analysis and pathological observations. We show that the super-paramagnetic nanofibrous scaffold accelerates bone tissue regeneration in situ under the external magnetic field and eventually led to faster repair of bone defect in reference to that without external magnetic field. This effect is attributed to the magnetic stimulation originated from the response of MNP embedded in the nanofibers to the external magnetic field.

Results

Super-paramagnetic responsive performance and microstructure of the composite scaffold

The original composite was a brown nonwoven film obtained from the mixture of poly lactide acid (PLA), hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (nHA) and super-paramagnetic γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles (MNP) in DMAc using electrospinning technique. Each film was carefully folded and fixed to pellets with the same volume and mass (Figure 1a), and then were implanted in situ of the bone defect as shown in the schematic graph (Figure 1b). The scaffold had nanofibrous network under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Diameter of the fibers ranged from 300 nm to 1000 nm. The average value of the diameters was 805 ± 113 nm, which was calculated from statistically counting and measuring more than 100 fibers randomly taken in ten of SEM images. Depositing layer by layer on the metal collector in the electrospinning, the fibers in the film entangled randomly and formed connecting network structure. The pores formed by entangled fibers were mostly in micrometer scale, majority of the pore size under SEM is about 10 ~ 20 μm (Figure 1c). The MNP (dark black shadows under TEM due to their high electron density) mainly located inside the fibers, while nHA (gray shadows due to their low electron density under TEM) mainly distributed near the surface of the fibers (Figure 1d). We previously reported that fibres composed of MNP and PLA have a smooth surface, while the surface of the fibres of either MNP/nHA/PLA or nHA/PLA was rough with particulates that are considered attribution of nHA that was embedded in the composite fibres35. The TEM observation provides further distribution information of the two kinds of nanoparticles and suggests the particulates near to the fibres surface under SEM are nHA. Those embedded nHA are benefit in improving bone compatibility of PLA. The nanofibrous composite films could produce super-paramagnetic response well with typical saturation magnetization value of 0.049 emu/g, which was same with that reported previously35 and attributable to MNP incorporation39.
Figure 1

Characterization of the super-paramagnetic nanofibrous scaffolds.

(a): The scaffold pellet with diameter of ~ 5 mm. (b): Scheme image of the scaffold pellet being implanted in the defect of transverse process of L5 of rabbits. (c): SEM image of the scaffold showing randomly tangled nanofibers with diameter ranging from 300 nm to 1000 nm. (d): TEM image of fibers in the scaffold.

Pathological observations

The tissue containing filled defects were taken out on day 10, 20 and 30 post the implantation and conducted conventional HE and perl's staining. Figure 2 presented representative photographs at different time points. Under light microscope, the scaffold was brown in the samples of H&E staining. It could be seen that the implanted scaffolds surrounded by different cells on day 10, mainly including macrophages (circled by green line and pointed by green arrow) and fibroblasts (pointed by yellow arrow). This indicates that the scaffolds recruite host-derived cells migrating to the defects area. The macrophages engulfed scaffold materials and became brown. Macrophage influx and fibroblasts surrounding are typical reactions of the host responding to foreign implants. At this time point, vessel structures with feature of endothelium cells arranging in circle appeared (pointed by blue arrow), and they were occasionally observed around the scaffolds. On day 20, the implanted scaffolds were separated into smaller pieces by the cells and the total brown area was reduced, suggesting that the scaffolds are degraded and absorbed over time. Along with above changes, osteoblast cells (pointed by red arrow) appeared and pink area around the scaffolds increased, indicating that bone repair process is initiated and new bone tissue formed around the scaffold pieces, because extracellular matrix substance is mainly composed of collagen appearing pink color by H&E staining. Meanwhile more vessel structures were seen very near around the scaffold pieces, implying that oxygen and nutrients can be supplied to support proliferation and differentiation of the osteoblast cells. On day 30, less scaffold pieces and more new bone tissue were observed, while macrophages and fibroblasts disappeared. In order to show the scaffolds degradation more clearly, perl's staining was used to make the scaffolds appear blue due to iron content. Results show that original blue area was separated into smaller pieces and the total blue area was reduced over time, giving further evidence that the scaffold is degraded and absorbed over time.
Figure 2

Representative histological images of the scaffolds implanted in the bone defect on day 10, 20, 30 post implantation.

Left column: Groups S; Right column: Group S + M. Macrophages were circled by green line and pointed by green arrow; Fibroblasts were pointed by yellow arrow; Vessels were pointed by blue arrow; Osteoblast cells were pointed by red arrow.

It is noticeable that during above process, both degradation rate and new bone formation for group S + M are faster than those for group S at each time point, which is attributable to the stimulation resulting from super-paramagnetic response due to MNP incorporation in the nanofibers. To make further confirmation, immunohistochemical staining was applied to detect the level of osteocalcin (OC) which is one bone-specific extracellular matrix protein produced by the osteoblast cells in new bone formation. At each testing time point, Group S + M exhibited higher level of OC than group S (Figure 3), showing more red-brown area (surrounded by red line). Particularly, group S + M showed the highest level of OC on the day 20 post surgery, suggesting that the scaffold induces the highest activity of new ECM secretion at that time point in synergizing with the applied magnetic field. At the same time, the implanted scaffolds became smaller (labeled by green rhombus).
Figure 3

Osteocalcin (OC) expression induced by the scaffolds implanted in the bone defect on day 10, 20, and 30 post implantation.

Left column: Groups S; Right column: Group S + M. OC positive cells were circled by red line; the scaffolds were labeled by green rhombus.

Sirus red stain was also employed to examine collagen deposition in the new extracellular matrix development. As shown in Figure 4, at each time point, group S + M exhibited more collagen content that group S, in particular, it exhibited clearer and denser collagen fibers on the day 30 in reference to group S. These are consistent with the observations of H&E, indicating that there are more osteoblast cells in higher activity on day 20, leading to more new bone tissue formation on day 30.
Figure 4

Sirius red stain for the collagen deposition in the scaffolds implanted in the bone defect on day 10, 20, and 30 post implantation.

Radiological observations

Additional to the pathological observation, radiological analysis of CT scan was conducted with the rabbits at different time points after the surgery (Figure 5). CT images showed incomplete fracture in the right transverse process either in group S or group S + M on day 10 after implantation. The scaffold showed lower density in the defect compared with the natural bone in the CT scan. On the day 10, the filled defect exhibited not homogeneous with blurred bright spots. The density of the area became stronger and homogeneous over time. On the day 50, the cortical bone had become connected and homogeneous, and the bone marrow cavity was mostly clear for group S + M, suggesting the new bone tissue has formed clear and organized morphology; instead, there was still non-homogeneous bone density hyperplasia for group S. These indicate that the applied static magnetic field promotes density increase of the defects area. On the day 90, bony connection was further improved in both groups. The shape of newly formed bone in group S + M became further homogenous, and the shape was very similar to that of natural bone, while the one in group S still showed thick and not continuous. These suggest that group S + M has completed the repair process, which is faster than group S. The imaging findings are consistent with corresponding pathological results.
Figure 5

CT images of the bone defects for group S and Group S + M post 10, 50 and 90 days implantation.

The arrows pointed to the defects.

Micro-CT measurement

Bone remodeling is one crucial step in the late of defect repair, in which the newly formed bone tissue will be reshaping by osteoclast cells, thus the newly formed bone tissue can match the shape and size of natural bone well. We next conducted micro-CT with the tissues excised from the repaired defects in situ on the day 110 to examine and compare the newly formed bone amount in the different groups. Figure 6A gave a comparison of the bone amount in the repaired defects. The bone amount for group S + M was lower than that for group S, suggesting that the remodeling process for group S + M is faster than that for group S. Pathological observation on day 110 after implantation supports the results of micro-CT. The implanted scaffold was completely absorbed for group S + M (Figure 6c), while there were small amount of scaffold remained for group S (Figure 6b). Additionally, the newly formed bone tissue was homogenous and well organized for group S + M, while the bone tissue for group S was thicker than that for group S + M. The result provides further evidence that group S + M completes the bone remodeling faster than group S.
Figure 6

New bone formation analyzed by Micro-CT and histological observation on 110 day post implantation.

(a): The amount of the new bone formed in the defects obtained from Micro-CT. (b) and (c): Histological observation of the bone defects in group S and group S + M respectively. (d): Magnification of b, showing small amount of the scaffolds remaining unabsorbed after 110 days implantation. (e): Magnification of c, showing a homogenous and well organized bone formation in the defect.

Evaluation of biocompatibility

All 24 rabbits survived the planned duration of the experiment. The rabbits revived within 2 h after the operation and could stand well and move freely in 24 h. The surgical lesions of all animals healed well without clinical signs of inflammation. All the animals gained weight in the post-operative period. Visual inspection after removal of bone defect showed seemingly well integrated scaffolds in the healed cortical bone. After euthanasia, the kidney, lung, liver, heart, spleen from all the animals were evaluated for potential abnormalities such as organ swelling, hemorrhage. The organs were further underwent conventional H&E staining. There are no indications of any pathological changes caused by the experiment (data not shown). The scaffold's biocompatibility was also evaluated by determining biochemical parameters of creatinine (CR) and creatinine kinase (CK) for kidney function, alanine aminatransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) for liver function. Figure 7 gave a summary of biochemistry analysis for the blood samples collected on day 30 post the implantation from the different group. The detected items were within the normal limits. Taken together, the scaffold did not exhibit any harmful signs in the biocompatibility.
Figure 7

Serum ALP (a), ALT (b), Cr (c) and CK (d) post 30 day implantation of scaffolds.

Discussion

Electrospun nanofibrous scaffold can provide a suitable environment for cell attachment and growth by mimicking the structure of natural extracellular matrices (ECMs)4041424344. Here we incorporated MNP in the nanofibers, expecting to give the fibers novel function of responding the applied magnetic field. The advantage of incorporation MNP in the scaffold is that MNP became an intrinsic component of the scaffold, which allows them produce huge amounts of miniature magnetic force in the scaffold under the external magnetic field to continually stimulate osteoblast cells proliferation and secretion of new ECM. Louis Yuge et al. reported that in conventional cells culture system, weak magnetic force with intensity of 10–50 mT accelerated osteoblast differentiation and this effect was largely attributed to the increased phosphorylation of p3845. At the same time, the nanofibrous structure of the scaffold provides to mimic microenvironment of natural extra cellular matrix. As expected, the scaffold under the external magnetic field induced earlier and higher amount of osteocalcin positive cells in situ, leading to the earlier and faster bone formation in the defect, evidenced by the faster achievement of cortical bone and medullar cavity continuity as well as by the pathological observations, when compared with that without magnetic fields. These strongly suggest continuous weak magnetic force stimulation have significant effect on the bone regeneration and repair, and the effect can be realized by applying an external magnetic field to super-paramagnetic responsive scaffolds. Besides new bone tissue formation, degradation rate for the scaffold is another important factor that determines bone repair. Too slow degradation of scaffold may hinder the formation and maturation of new bones at the late stage of bone healing. Under the external magnetic field, the scaffold degrades faster than that without the external magnetic field. It is likely that macrophages recruited by the scaffold are more active due to the magnetic stimulation from the scaffold under the external magnetic field. The enhancement effect of the scaffold on osteogenesis is encouraging. Underlying mechanisms and the relationship between macrophages, magnetic field and scaffold degradation are worth further exploitations, which is benefit in optimizing magnetic strength and modulating better osteogenesis effects in the future. In conclusion, the novel super-paramagnetic nanofibrous composite scaffold accelerated new bone tissue formation and remodeling through synergizing with the applied static magnetic field, which provides a promising new strategy of guiding and enhancing bone repair in situ.

Methods

Preparation and characterization of super-paramagnetic nanofibrous scaffold

Super-paramagnetic nanoparticles of γ-Fe2O3 coated with meso-2, 3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (MNP) was prepared according to a protocol described in our previous reference39. Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (nHA) were purchased from Nanjing Emperor Nano Material Co., Ltd (purity: 97%, major diameter: 20 nm). Poly (DL-lactide) (PLA) with an average molecular weight of 10 kDa was purchased from Chengdu Dikang Biomedical Co., Ltd. Nanofibrous film was prepared according to the procedure in reference35. In brief, 2.5 g of MNP and 10 g of nHA were dispersed homogeneously in 10 mL of dimethylacetamide (DMAc by aid of a probe ultrasonication. Next, 20 g of PLA was dissolved in above suspension. The resulting mixture was electrospun to form nanofibrous nonwoven films. In order to fit bone defect shape in animal model, the films were folded carefully to fabricate pellets with the same volume and mass. The diameter of the pellets was about 0.5 cm. All samples were sterilized with ethylene oxide. The morphology of electrospun nanofibers was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM, Hitch s-5200) and transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL JEM-1400), using conventional sample preparation methods.

Implantation surgery in rabbit model

The animal experiment protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Peking Union Medical College. All surgery was performed under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. Three-month-old New Zealand white rabbits weighting 2.0–2.5 kg were used to create bone defect model. All animals were kept in the Animal center of the Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Beijing, China) and randomly divided into 2 groups: (1) group S: scaffold group (n = 12); (2) group S + M: scaffold plus applied magnetic field group (n = 12). The animals were used in the following studies: a) biochemical analysis, H&E, perl's blue, oesteocalcin (OC) and sirius red staining (n = 9 for each group, three rabbits per time point: day 10, 20, and 30), b) CT analysis: the rabbits were continually scanned by CT at different time point (n = 3 for each group). c) microCT analysis: On day 110, the rabbits for CT scan analysis were scarified and the defects were analyzed through Micro-CT. Then the bone defects further underwent histological analysis.

Surgery procedure

The animals were anesthetized by a combination of phenobarbital sodium (30 mg kg−1 Merck, Germany) and procaine (5 mg kg−1). The surgical approach was median and posterior over the dosal spines of vertebrae L5 and L6, which were located by palpation and their distance from the iliac crests. The surgical site was shaved and scrubbed with iodine. Using sterile instruments and aseptic technique, a 2 cm dorsal median skin incision was made. The subcutaneous tissue, musculature periosteum was dissected and reflected to expose the transverse process of L5. Using a small rongeur, partial process was excised about 1 cm from the vertebral body, mimicking a partial laminectomy defect. The bone defects were filled with electrospun scaffold pellets. The wound was sutured layer by layer and no external fixation was applied.

Animal cages and animal care post the surgery

After surgery, rabbits in group S + M were raised in the cages with permanent magnets fixed on the opposite two sides of the cages (Figure S1), The magnets provided a static magnetic field in the cages, which was measured by Tesla meter (VSM, Lakeshore 7407). The intensity distribution of magnetic fields near the permanent magnets was showed in Figure S2. The magnetic intensity was 0.05–0.2 mT for the middle plane of the cage, and 5–25 mT for the two sides, as shown in Figure S3. Rabbits in group S were raised in the normal cages without magnets. All rabbits post surgery were given muscle injection of penicillin (Lu Kang Pharmace utical Co. Ltd., Shandong, China) with a dose of 400,000 units for 3 days.

CT examination and image analysis

New bone formation was evaluated by computer tomography measurements of each animal on day 10, 50 and day 90 post implantation of scaffolds. After being anesthetized by sodium pentobartital and maintained in prone position, animals were scanned with Dual Source CT scanner (Somatom Sensation 64, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany) and the data were then reconstructed as three dimensional (3D) images using a MMWP working platform with 3D software (Siemens, Germany). The scan coverage was form xiphoid to the coccyx. The scanning parameters were as follows: 40 mAs; 120 KV; collimation 0.6 mm; FOV 20 cm; interval 0.6 mm. CT images were reconstructed with a thin slice thickness of 1 mm for diagnostic evaluation. All images were presented in a random order to two each experienced radiologists, who were blinded to the pathologic result and the model type of the animals.

Histological observation

The samples of transverse processes defects implanted with scaffolds were collected on the day 10, 20 and 30, and fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin, and then transferred into 70% ethyl alcohol. Tissue samples for paraffin sections were decalcified with 10% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution for 8 weeks, then dehydrated in a series of graded ethanol, and embedded in paraffin. Longitudinal sections cut at 5 μm were used for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Transmitted light images of the stained sections were taken with Olympus BX53 microscope connected with a CCD camera (DP72; Olympus, Japan) allowing to record pictures with the Cellsense standard software (Olympus, Japan).

Iron staining

To directly visualize the scaffold-associated iron oxide particles, the sections previously prepared were stained with perl's reagent made of equal volumes of potassium ferrocyanide prepared in two-fold concentrated PBS and 2% hydrochloric acid in distilled water. The sections were immersed in the reagent for 20 minutes. After washing in distilled water, the sections were counterstained with neutral red for 5 minutes. Sections were dehydrated, covered for observation under an Olympus BX53 microscope. The iron parts became bright blue and the nuclei became red.

Collagen and osteocalcin staining

Sirius red dye is a strong anionic dye used for measuring collagen. The sections were deparaffinized and hydrated via a descending ethanol series followed by washing in running water. The specimens were stained with hematoxyl for 8 min and then immersed into in sirius red solution (0.1% in saturated picric acid, Sigma Aldrich) for 1 h. The sections were then washed in acidified water followed by dehydration and mounting. The stained sections were observed by a polarized microscope (BX53, Olympus, Japan). For immunohistochemical staining of osteocalcin, the sections were deparaffinized, and then antigen retrieval was performed with a pressure cooker treatment by soaking the sections in a sodium citrate buffer for 10 min. After blocking endogenous peroxidase, the sections were incubated with goat serum at room temperature for 10 min to block nonspecific staining, and then with a primary mouse monoclonal antibody (1:100, Abcam Hong Kong Ltd) overnight at 4°C. Peroxidase activity was detected using enzyme substrate of diaminobenzidine (DAB). For negative controls, sections were treated in an identical manner with the exception that they were incubated in Tris-buffered saline without primary antibody.

Micro-CT and histological analysis at the terminal of healing

Processes with implantation were excised on day 110 and fixed in 4% of paraformaldeheyde for 24 h at 4°C. The specimens were wrapped in parafilm and scanned in air using a commercially available microCT scanner (SkyScan 1172, Bruker). After reconstruction, the volume of interest (VOI) was represented by an inner region of the reconstructed images of the scaffold implantation. In order to eliminate potential edge effects, the VOI was selected to be slightly smaller than the scaffold diameter to reduce interfacial errors. Thereafter, the samples were decalcified, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin for further staining with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E).

Biochemical analysis

To evaluate biocompatibility of the scaffolds, blood samples were collected from the rabbits at designated time points post surgery. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), creatinine (Cr) and creatinine kinase (CK) in the serum were examined using automated chemistry analyzer (Olympus AU-5400, Japan).

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard derivation. The statistical significance of the differences between the experimental groups was evaluated using a two tail Student's t-test for unpaired values. A value of p < 0.1 was considered statistically significant.

Author Contributions

H.X. and N.G. designed experiments, made data analysis and wrote the main manuscript. J.M. and B.X. prepared scaffolds, conducted animal experiments and made data analysis; prepared all figures and discussed all sections of the manuscript with the corresponding authors. Y.Z. and J.L. prepared super-paramagnetic nanoparticles, measured magnetic field strength, and prepared supporting information. H.X., J.L. and Z.J. conducted CT and microCT imaging and made data analysis. H.K. prepared electrospun films and made morphological characterization. Y.H. instructed animal surgery. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
  37 in total

1.  Tissue shear deformation stimulates proteoglycan and protein biosynthesis in bovine cartilage explants.

Authors:  M Jin; E H Frank; T M Quinn; E B Hunziker; A J Grodzinsky
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 2.  Biomimetic hydroxyapatite-containing composite nanofibrous substrates for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  J Venugopal; Molamma P Prabhakaran; Yanzhong Zhang; Sharon Low; Aw Tar Choon; S Ramakrishna
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Effects of a strong static magnetic field on blood platelets.

Authors:  T Higashi; S Sagawa; N Kawaguchi; A Yamagishi
Journal:  Platelets       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.862

4.  Paramagnetic nanofibrous composite films enhance the osteogenic responses of pre-osteoblast cells.

Authors:  Jie Meng; Yu Zhang; Xiaojin Qi; Hua Kong; Chaoying Wang; Zhen Xu; Sishen Xie; Ning Gu; Haiyan Xu
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 7.790

Review 5.  Stimulation of bone formation and fracture healing with pulsed electromagnetic fields: biologic responses and clinical implications.

Authors:  B Chalidis; N Sachinis; A Assiotis; G Maccauro
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.219

6.  Liquid crystallinity in collagen solutions and magnetic orientation of collagen fibrils.

Authors:  N S Murthy
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.505

7.  Magnetic alignment of collagen during self-assembly.

Authors:  J Torbet; M C Ronzière
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1984-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  The effects of pulsed electromagnetism on fresh fracture healing: osteochondral repair in the rat femoral groove.

Authors:  K L Grace; W J Revell; M Brookes
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  Magnetic hydroxyapatite bone substitutes to enhance tissue regeneration: evaluation in vitro using osteoblast-like cells and in vivo in a bone defect.

Authors:  Silvia Panseri; Carla Cunha; Teresa D'Alessandro; Monica Sandri; Alessandro Russo; Gianluca Giavaresi; Maurilio Marcacci; Clark T Hung; Anna Tampieri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Magnetic responsive hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds construction for bone defect reparation.

Authors:  Xiao Bo Zeng; Hao Hu; Li Qin Xie; Fang Lan; Wen Jiang; Yao Wu; Zhong Wei Gu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-07-04
View more
  33 in total

1.  The prospective opportunities offered by magnetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a review.

Authors:  Alessandro Ortolani; Michele Bianchi; Massimiliano Mosca; Silvio Caravelli; Mario Fuiano; Maurilio Marcacci; Alessandro Russo
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-02-07

2.  Accurate micro-computed tomography imaging of pore spaces in collagen-based scaffold.

Authors:  Jan Zidek; Lucy Vojtova; A M Abdel-Mohsen; Jiri Chmelik; Tomas Zikmund; Jana Brtnikova; Roman Jakubicek; Lukas Zubal; Jiri Jan; Jozef Kaiser
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Polydopamine coating with static magnetic field promotes the osteogenic differentiation of human bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells on three-dimensional printed porous titanium scaffolds by upregulation of the BMP-Smads signaling pathway.

Authors:  Lingpeng Kong; Yong Han; Qingsen Lu; Dongsheng Zhou; Bomin Wang; Dawei Wang; Wupeng Zhang; Hao Xiang; Mingzhen Li; Fu Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 4.  Nanotechnological approach and bio-inspired materials to face degenerative diseases in aging.

Authors:  Anna Tampieri; Monica Sandri; Michele Iafisco; Silvia Panseri; Monica Montesi; Alessio Adamiano; Massimiliano Dapporto; Elisabetta Campodoni; Samuele M Dozio; Lorenzo Degli Esposti; Simone Sprio
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 5.  Hierarchically designed bone scaffolds: From internal cues to external stimuli.

Authors:  Yingying Du; Jason L Guo; Jianglin Wang; Antonios G Mikos; Shengmin Zhang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Iron Oxide Nanoparticles in Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Ralf P Friedrich; Iwona Cicha; Christoph Alexiou
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 5.719

7.  Research progress on effect of magnetic nanoparticle composite scaffold on osteogenesis.

Authors:  Wenni Wang; Chaoqun Chen; Xinhua Gu
Journal:  Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2022-02-25

8.  Assessing the combination of magnetic field stimulation, iron oxide nanoparticles, and aligned electrospun fibers for promoting neurite outgrowth from dorsal root ganglia in vitro.

Authors:  Jessica L Funnell; Alexis M Ziemba; James F Nowak; Hussein Awada; Nicos Prokopiou; Johnson Samuel; Yannick Guari; Benjamin Nottelet; Ryan J Gilbert
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 10.633

9.  Bone mesenchymal stem cells stimulation by magnetic nanoparticles and a static magnetic field: release of exosomal miR-1260a improves osteogenesis and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Di Wu; Xiao Chang; Jingjing Tian; Lin Kang; Yuanhao Wu; Jieying Liu; Xiangdong Wu; Yue Huang; Bo Gao; Hai Wang; Guixing Qiu; Zhihong Wu
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 10.435

10.  Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using 3D Magnetic Scaffolds.

Authors:  Alyaa I Aldebs; Fatema T Zohora; Nasim Nosoudi; Surinder P Singh; Jaime E Ramirez-Vick
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.