Literature DB >> 30224407

Implementing bedside rounds to improve patient-centred outcomes: a systematic review.

John T Ratelle1, Adam P Sawatsky2, Deanne T Kashiwagi3, Will M Schouten3, Patricia J Erwin4, Jed D Gonzalo5, Thomas J Beckman2, Colin P West2,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bedside rounds (BR) have been proposed as an ideal method to promote patient-centred hospital care, but there is substantial variation in their implementation and effects. Our objectives were to describe the implementation of BR in hospital settings and determine their effect on patient-centred outcomes. <br> METHODS: Data sources included Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus and Ovid Cochrane Central Registry of Clinical Trials from database inception through 28 July 2017. We included experimental studies comparing BR to another form of rounds in a hospital-based setting (ie, medical/surgical unit, intensive care unit (ICU)) and reporting a quantitative patient-reported or objectively measured clinical outcome. We used random effects models to calculate pooled Cohen's d effect size estimates for the patient knowledge and patient experience outcome domains. <br> RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria, including 20 from adult care (17 non-ICU, 3 ICU), and nine from paediatrics (5 non-ICU, 4 ICU), the majority of which (n=23) were conducted in the USA. Thirteen studies implemented BR with cointerventions as part of a 'bundle'. Studies most commonly reported outcomes in the domains of patient experience (n=24) and patient knowledge (n=10). We found a small, statistically significant improvement in patient experience with BR (summary Cohen's d=0.09, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.14, p<0.001, I2=56%), but no significant association between BR and patient knowledge (Cohen's d=0.21, 95% CI -0.004 to -0.43, p=0.054, I2=92%). Risk of bias was moderate to high, with methodological limitations most often relating to selective reporting, low adherence rates and missing data. <br> CONCLUSIONS: BR have been implemented in a variety of hospital settings, often 'bundled' with cointerventions. However, BR have demonstrated limited effect on patient-centred outcomes. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health services research; hospital medicine; patient satisfaction; patient-centred care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30224407     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  9 in total

1.  A scoping review of new implementations of interprofessional bedside rounding models to improve teamwork, care, and outcomes in hospitals.

Authors:  Erin Abu-Rish Blakeney; Frances Chu; Andrew A White; G Randy Smith; Kyla Woodward; Danielle C Lavallee; Rachel Marie E Salas; Genevieve Beaird; Mayumi A Willgerodt; Deborah Dang; John M Dent; Elizabeth Ibby Tanner; Nicole Summerside; Brenda K Zierler; Kevin D O'Brien; Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 2.338

2.  Impact of Fellows-as-Teachers Workshops on Teaching Rounds: An Observational Study in an ICU.

Authors:  Paul A Bergl; Rose M Franco; Jayshil J Patel; Marium Khan; Kathlyn E Fletcher; Rahul S Nanchal
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2020-10-19

3.  Purposeful interprofessional team intervention improves relational coordination among advanced heart failure care teams.

Authors:  Erin Abu-Rish Blakeney; Danielle C Lavallee; Dawon Baik; Susan Pambianco; Kevin D O'Brien; Brenda K Zierler
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2018-12-30       Impact factor: 2.338

4.  The Effect of Bedside Rounds on Learning Outcomes in Medical Education: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  John T Ratelle; Caitlyn N Gallagher; Adam P Sawatsky; Deanne T Kashiwagi; Will M Schouten; Jed D Gonzalo; Thomas J Beckman; Colin P West
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 7.840

5.  Sustaining improvements in relational coordination following team training and practice change: A longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Erin Abu-Rish Blakeney; Hebatallah Naim Ali; Nicole Summerside; Danielle C Lavallee; Benjamin Kragen; Mayumi A Willgerodt; Bryan J Weiner; Leah Spacciante; Brenda K Zierler
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec 01

6.  Redesigning the Clinical Learning Environment to Improve Interprofessional Care and Education: Multi-Method Program Evaluation of the iPACE Pilot Unit.

Authors:  Sarah Hallen; Thomas Van der Kloot; Christyna McCormack; Paul K J Han; Frances L Lucas; Lisbeth Wierda; Daniel Meyer; Kalli Varaklis; Robert Bing-You
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-10

7.  Relationships Between Time-at-Bedside During Hospital Ward Rounds, Clinician-Patient Agreement, and Patient Experience.

Authors:  John T Ratelle; Michelle Herberts; Donna Miller; Ashok Kumbamu; Donna Lawson; Eric Polley; Thomas J Beckman
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2021-04-08

8.  Effect of family presence during teaching rounds on patient's anxiety and satisfaction in cardiac intensive care unit: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ali Ansari Jaberi; Fahimeh Zamani; Ali Esmaeili Nadimi; Tayebeh Negahban Bonabi
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2020-01-30

9.  The Effects of Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds on Patient Centeredness, Quality of Care, and Team Collaboration: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tine Heip; Ann Van Hecke; Simon Malfait; Wim Van Biesen; Kristof Eeckloo
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.844

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.