Literature DB >> 30224206

Latissimus dorsi muscle transfer reduces external rotation deficit at the cost of internal rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty patients: a cohort study.

Matthias Flury1, Sebastian Kwisda1, Christoph Kolling2, Laurent Audigé3.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy (RCA) with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and an additional latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) in patients with an active external rotation deficit (ERD) would restore external rotation (ER) with concomitant deterioration in internal rotation.
METHODS: In our cohort study, 26 RCA patients with an active ERD (ie, positive lag sign and maximum active ER of 0°) underwent RSA between September 2007 and February 2015; LDT was completed in 13 of these patients. In addition, 88 control patients without ERD who underwent only RSA were identified. Clinical outcomes of strength, range of motion, Constant-Murley score, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score, as well as complications, were documented 6, 12, 24, and 60 months postoperatively. We made comparative analyses using statistical mixed models.
RESULTS: The LDT procedure extended the surgical time by 26 minutes (P = .003). LDT patients had up to 22° better postoperative active ER than control patients (P < .001), although this was accompanied by an internal rotation deficit (77% vs 46% of control patients could not reach the lumbosacral region, P = .010). We calculated a 23% risk of local procedure-related complications for RSA patients with an active ERD and LDT.
CONCLUSION: Patients with RCA and an active ERD seem to benefit from an LDT, although this is accompanied by the potential loss of internal rotation. This additional procedure is associated with an extended surgical time as well as a possible increase in the risk of a complication occurring.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shoulder; arthroplasty; functional outcomes; latissimus dorsi transfer; reverse shoulder replacement; shoulder external rotation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30224206     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.06.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  9 in total

Review 1.  Advances and Update on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen G Thon; Adam J Seidl; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty; Felix H Savoie; Rachel M Frank
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-02

2.  Preoperative external rotation deficit does not predict poor outcomes or lack of improvement after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Moby Parsons; Howard D Routman; Christopher P Roche; Richard J Friedman
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-22

3.  Change in shoulder external rotation strength and motion after lower trapezius transfer to the infraspinatus in children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy.

Authors:  Charline Garcon; Hicham Abdelnour; Clément Jeandel; Djamel Louahem; Isabelle Laffont; Jérôme Cottalorda; Karen Lambert; Bertrand Coulet; Marion Delpont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with isolated latissimus dorsi or combined with teres major transfer for lack of external rotation: a comparative study.

Authors:  Efi Kazum; Natalia Martinez-Catalan; Giovanni Caruso; Brian A Schofield; Imen Nidtahar; Frantzeska Zampeli; Philippe Valenti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.479

5.  Mid-term outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with latissimus dorsi transfer.

Authors:  Akshar V Patel; Douglas J Matijakovich; Robert L Brochin; Ryley K Zastrow; Bradford O Parsons; Evan L Flatow; Michael R Hausman; Paul J Cagle
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2021-03-08

6.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with latissimus dorsi and teres major transfer: biomechanical and electromyographical outcomes.

Authors:  Javier Alonso-Rodriguez Piedra; Brunno Souza Virgolino; Ferran Gamez Baños; Quimey Miranda Elstein; Cristina Ventura Parellada; Jose M Mora Guix
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-03-12

Review 7.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Spencer W Sullivan; Benjamin T Gaal; Stewart Dalton; Arjun Sharma; Joseph J King; Brian M Grawe; Surena Namdari; Macy Lawler; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-10

8.  Complications and Intraoperative Fractures in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andrea Dolci; Barbara Melis; Marco Verona; Antonio Capone; Giuseppe Marongiu
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-08

9.  The Schulthess local Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry (SAR): cohort profile.

Authors:  Alex Marzel; Hans-Kaspar Schwyzer; Christoph Kolling; Fabrizio Moro; Matthias Flury; Michael C Glanzmann; Christian Jung; Barbara Wirth; Beatrice Weber; Beat Simmen; Markus Scheibel; Laurent Audigé
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.