Inti Barrientos-Gutierrez1, Paula Lozano2, Edna Arillo-Santillan3, Paola Morello4, Raul Mejia4, James F Thrasher5. 1. National Institute of Public Health, Mexico Universidad, No. 655, Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico, CP.62100. Electronic address: inti.barrientos@insp.mx. 2. University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health. Discovery I,915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC 29208, United States. 3. National Institute of Public Health, Mexico Universidad, No. 655, Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico, CP.62100. 4. Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad (CEDES), Sánchez de Bustamante 27, C1173AAA CABA, Argentina. 5. National Institute of Public Health, Mexico Universidad, No. 655, Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico, CP.62100; University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health. Discovery I,915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC 29208, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Develop and validate a scale that measures Technophilia (positive orientation toward new technology) and use it to address orientation toward new technologies to explain e-cigarette trial and adoption, especially in relatively low risk adolescents. METHODS: Survey data were obtained from students of the three largest cities in Mexico (n = 8123). We developed eight questions involving access, use and pleasure from different electronic media to measure technophilia. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted. Linear GEE models were used when regressing technophilia on covariates. When regressing e-cigarette and conventional cigarette trial and use, logistic GEE models were used. Finally, we used multinomial logistic regression to evaluate the associations between technophilia and e-cigarettes as the first tobacco product. RESULTS: Technophilia were correlated with theoretically-related variables. Unadjusted and adjusted models regressing e-cigarette trial and use indicated that students in the highest quartile for technophilia were more likely to have tried e-cigarettes compared with the lowest quartile (AORQ4 vs Q1 = 1.36, 95% CI 1.14-1.62). Technophilia was not independently associated with current e-cigarette use in adjusted models. Students with higher technophilia were more likely to have first tried e-cigarettes in both crude and adjusted models (AORQ4vQ1 = 1.66, 95% CI 1.20-2.31; AORQ3vQ1 = 1.43, 95% CI 1.02-2.01). Technophilia did not have a statistically significant, independent association with first use of other tobacco products. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that technophilia is associated with trial of e-cigarettes among youth. The measure we developed appears useful for understanding why some youth are open to trying novel, technologically oriented ways to consume nicotine.
PURPOSE: Develop and validate a scale that measures Technophilia (positive orientation toward new technology) and use it to address orientation toward new technologies to explain e-cigarette trial and adoption, especially in relatively low risk adolescents. METHODS: Survey data were obtained from students of the three largest cities in Mexico (n = 8123). We developed eight questions involving access, use and pleasure from different electronic media to measure technophilia. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted. Linear GEE models were used when regressing technophilia on covariates. When regressing e-cigarette and conventional cigarette trial and use, logistic GEE models were used. Finally, we used multinomial logistic regression to evaluate the associations between technophilia and e-cigarettes as the first tobacco product. RESULTS: Technophilia were correlated with theoretically-related variables. Unadjusted and adjusted models regressing e-cigarette trial and use indicated that students in the highest quartile for technophilia were more likely to have tried e-cigarettes compared with the lowest quartile (AORQ4 vs Q1 = 1.36, 95% CI 1.14-1.62). Technophilia was not independently associated with current e-cigarette use in adjusted models. Students with higher technophilia were more likely to have first tried e-cigarettes in both crude and adjusted models (AORQ4vQ1 = 1.66, 95% CI 1.20-2.31; AORQ3vQ1 = 1.43, 95% CI 1.02-2.01). Technophilia did not have a statistically significant, independent association with first use of other tobacco products. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that technophilia is associated with trial of e-cigarettes among youth. The measure we developed appears useful for understanding why some youth are open to trying novel, technologically oriented ways to consume nicotine.
Authors: Stephen S Hecht; Steven G Carmella; Delshanee Kotandeniya; Makenzie E Pillsbury; Menglan Chen; Benjamin W S Ransom; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Elizabeth Thompson; Sharon E Murphy; Dorothy K Hatsukami Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-10-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Daniel P Giovenco; David Hammond; Catherine G Corey; Bridget K Ambrose; Cristine D Delnevo Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-12-26 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Samir Soneji; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Thomas A Wills; Adam M Leventhal; Jennifer B Unger; Laura A Gibson; JaeWon Yang; Brian A Primack; Judy A Andrews; Richard A Miech; Tory R Spindle; Danielle M Dick; Thomas Eissenberg; Robert C Hornik; Rui Dang; James D Sargent Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Adam M Leventhal; David R Strong; Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Jennifer B Unger; Steve Sussman; Nathaniel R Riggs; Matthew D Stone; Rubin Khoddam; Jonathan M Samet; Janet Audrain-McGovern Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lion Shahab; Maciej L Goniewicz; Benjamin C Blount; Jamie Brown; Ann McNeill; K Udeni Alwis; June Feng; Lanqing Wang; Robert West Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Eric M Clark; Chris A Jones; Jake Ryland Williams; Allison N Kurti; Mitchell Craig Norotsky; Christopher M Danforth; Peter Sheridan Dodds Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Luis Zavala-Arciniega; Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu; David T Levy; Yan Kwan Lau; Rafael Meza; Daniela Sarahí Gutiérrez-Torres; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Nancy L Fleischer; James Thrasher Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Luis Zavala-Arciniega; Paula Lozano; Christy Kollath-Cattano; Daniela Sarahí Gutierrez-Torres; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Inti Barrientos-Gutiérrez; James W Hardin; James F Thrasher Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Gustavo Sóñora; Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu; Joaquin Barnoya; Blanca Llorente; André Salem Szklo; James F Thrasher Journal: Tob Control Date: 2022-03 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Luis Zavala-Arciniega; Inti Barrientos-Gutiérrez; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Katia Gallegos-Carrillo; Rosibel Rodríguez-Bolaños; James F Thrasher Journal: Salud Publica Mex Date: 2021-07-29
Authors: Inti Barrientos-Gutierrez; Farahnaz Islam; Yoo Jin Cho; Ramzi George Salloum; Jordan Louviere; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu; Joaquin Barnoya; Belen Saenz de Miera Juarez; James Hardin; James F Thrasher Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Katia Gallegos-Carrillo; Inti Barrientos-Gutiérrez; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Luis Zavala-Arciniega; Yoo Jin Cho; James F Thrasher Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lizeth Cruz-Jiménez; Inti Barrientos-Gutiérrez; Liliana Coutiño-Escamilla; Katia Gallegos-Carrillo; Edna Arillo-Santillán; James F Thrasher Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-25 Impact factor: 3.390