Emily Anne McDonald1, Pamela M Ling2. 1. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. 2. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This qualitative research explores the use of electronic cigarettes and other similar 'vapor' delivery devices among young adults in New York City. METHODS: We employed 17 focus groups followed by 12 semistructured interviews to understand the beliefs, opinions and practices related to the use of electronic cigarettes among young adult smokers (N=87). RESULTS: Participants were mainly daily (52%) and non-daily (41%) smokers. While experimentation with electronic cigarette devices was frequently reported, participants related an overall lack of information about the devices and what they did know often reflected messages in e-cigarette marketing campaigns. Participants also used their own bodily sensations as a way to gauge potential risks and benefits of the products. Finally, young adults, steeped in a culture of personal technologies, perceived e-cigarettes as one more 'toy' among other technologies integrated into their everyday lives. DISCUSSION: E-cigarettes were also frequently used with other tobacco products, including conventional cigarettes. Our research indicates that public health campaigns may be needed to counter current industry marketing and inform the public that electronic cigarettes are currently unregulated, understudied and contain toxicants and carcinogens. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
OBJECTIVE: This qualitative research explores the use of electronic cigarettes and other similar 'vapor' delivery devices among young adults in New York City. METHODS: We employed 17 focus groups followed by 12 semistructured interviews to understand the beliefs, opinions and practices related to the use of electronic cigarettes among young adult smokers (N=87). RESULTS:Participants were mainly daily (52%) and non-daily (41%) smokers. While experimentation with electronic cigarette devices was frequently reported, participants related an overall lack of information about the devices and what they did know often reflected messages in e-cigarette marketing campaigns. Participants also used their own bodily sensations as a way to gauge potential risks and benefits of the products. Finally, young adults, steeped in a culture of personal technologies, perceived e-cigarettes as one more 'toy' among other technologies integrated into their everyday lives. DISCUSSION: E-cigarettes were also frequently used with other tobacco products, including conventional cigarettes. Our research indicates that public health campaigns may be needed to counter current industry marketing and inform the public that electronic cigarettes are currently unregulated, understudied and contain toxicants and carcinogens. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Authors: Erin L Sutfin; Thomas P McCoy; Holly E R Morrell; Bettina B Hoeppner; Mark Wolfson Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2013-06-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Erin L Sutfin; Beth A Reboussin; Beata Debinski; Kimberly G Wagoner; John Spangler; Mark Wolfson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jennifer P Alexander; Blair N Coleman; Sarah E Johnson; Greta K Tessman; Cindy Tworek; Denise M Dickinson Journal: Tob Regul Sci Date: 2016-07-01
Authors: Dana A Cavallo; Grace Kong; Daniel M Ells; Deepa R Camenga; Meghan E Morean; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2019-04-01
Authors: Kimberly G Wagoner; Jennifer Cornacchione; Kimberly D Wiseman; Randall Teal; Kathryn E Moracco; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 4.244