Literature DB >> 30223759

Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Engagement in Diabetes Self-management Education Among People With Diabetes in the United States.

Eric Adjei Boakye1, Amanda Varble2, Rebecca Rojek2, Olivia Peavler3, Anna K Trainer2, Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters2,4,5, Leslie Hinyard1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Research outside the United States shows that certain subgroups of patients (eg, those who are older, male, of low socioeconomic status, and uninsured) are less likely than others to report receiving diabetes self-management education (DSME); however, less is known about DSME uptake in the United States. We examined sociodemographic, patient, and behavioral characteristics associated with DSME in a nationally representative sample.
METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2011-2013 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for 84 179 adults who self-identified receiving a diagnosis of diabetes. We constructed weighted, multivariate logistic regression models to examine the associations between DSME and sociodemographic characteristics (age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, education, and annual household income), patient characteristics (body mass index, having a regular provider, health insurance status, health status, and insulin use), and self-management behaviors (home foot examination, home blood glucose testing, and physical activity).
RESULTS: More than half (n = 45 557, 53.7% [weighted]) of respondents reported engaging in DSME. Compared with non-Hispanic white adults, non-Hispanic black adults were more likely to engage in DSME (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.29). Respondents were less likely to engage in DSME if they were male (aOR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80-0.91) or Hispanic (aOR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71-0.92), were a high school graduate (but no college; aOR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.66-0.78) or less than a high school graduate (aOR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.45-0.59), had an annual household income of $15 000-$24 999 (aOR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.89) or <$15 000 (aOR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.62-0.78), or had no health insurance (aOR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98). DSME was significantly associated with all 3 self-management behaviors.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing public health interventions aimed at educating people with diabetes about self-management could improve outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  demographics; diabetes education; diabetes self-management; socioeconomic status; type 2 diabetes

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30223759      PMCID: PMC6225878          DOI: 10.1177/0033354918794935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  27 in total

1.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Predictors and effectiveness of diabetes self-management education in clinical practice.

Authors:  Baiju R Shah; Gillian L Booth
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-09-20

3.  Diabetes Self-management Education and Support in Type 2 Diabetes: A Joint Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.

Authors:  Margaret A Powers; Joan Bardsley; Marjorie Cypress; Paulina Duker; Martha M Funnell; Amy Hess Fischl; Melinda D Maryniuk; Linda Siminerio; Eva Vivian
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2016-04

4.  Efficacy of ongoing group based diabetes self-management education for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lisbeth Ø Rygg; Marit By Rise; Kjersti Grønning; Aslak Steinsbekk
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-05-17

5.  Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M J Davies; S Heller; T C Skinner; M J Campbell; M E Carey; S Cradock; H M Dallosso; H Daly; Y Doherty; S Eaton; C Fox; L Oliver; K Rantell; G Rayman; K Khunti
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-02-14

6.  Older Adults' Perceived Challenges With Health Care Providers Treating Their Type 2 Diabetes and Comorbid Conditions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Beverly; Linda A Wray; Ching-Ju Chiu; Cynthia L LaCoe
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2014-01

7.  Why do GPs hesitate to refer diabetes patients to a self-management education program: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Patricia Sunaert; Marie Vandekerckhove; Hilde Bastiaens; Luc Feyen; Piet Vanden Bussche; Jan De Maeseneer; An De Sutter; Sara Willems
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Projecting the future diabetes population size and related costs for the U.S.

Authors:  Elbert S Huang; Anirban Basu; Michael O'Grady; James C Capretta
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Disparities in attendance at diabetes self-management education programs after diagnosis in Ontario, Canada: a cohort study.

Authors:  Karen Cauch-Dudek; J Charles Victor; Marianne Sigmond; Baiju R Shah
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  National standards for diabetes self-management education.

Authors:  Martha M Funnell; Tammy L Brown; Belinda P Childs; Linda B Haas; Gwen M Hosey; Brian Jensen; Melinda Maryniuk; Mark Peyrot; John D Piette; Diane Reader; Linda M Siminerio; Katie Weinger; Michael A Weiss
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  12 in total

1.  Diabetes Self-Management Education for Special Populations: The Social Determinants of Health Matter.

Authors:  LaPrincess C Brewer; Lisa A Cooper; Christi A Patten
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Process evaluation of a medical assistant health coaching intervention for type 2 diabetes in diverse primary care settings.

Authors:  Taylor L Clark; Addie L Fortmann; Athena Philis-Tsimikas; Thomas Bodenheimer; Kimberly L Savin; Haley Sandoval; Julia I Bravin; Linda C Gallo
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Health insurance status and type associated with varying levels of glycemic control in the US: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA).

Authors:  Rebecca S Gold; Jonathan T Unkart; Robyn L McClelland; Alain G Bertoni; Matthew A Allison
Journal:  Prim Care Diabetes       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.459

4.  A Risk Stratification Approach to Allocating Diabetes Education and Support Services.

Authors:  Margaret F Zupa; Jodie Krall; Kevin Collins; Oscar Marroquin; Jason M Ng; Linda Siminerio
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Learning types and learning success in a structured diabetes education programme for patients with type 2 diabetes: study protocol of a prospective, longitudinal study.

Authors:  Thimo Morro; Astrid Fink; Solveig Carmienke; Thomas Frese; Sebastian Guenther
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  What impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth Hardman; Stephen Begg; Evelien Spelten
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Sociodemographic Factors Associated with Participation in Diabetes Education among Community-Dwelling Adults with Diabetes.

Authors:  Young Hoon Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Patient Activation, Depressive Symptoms, and Self-Rated Health: Care Management Intervention Effects among High-Need, Medically Complex Adults.

Authors:  Cynthia F Corbett; Kenn B Daratha; Sterling McPherson; Crystal L Smith; Michael S Wiser; Brenda K Vogrig; Sean M Murphy; Roy Cantu; Dennis G Dyck
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Superior socioeconomic status in patients with type 2 diabetes having gastric bypass surgery: a case-control analysis of 10 642 individuals.

Authors:  Magnus Sundbom; Stefan Franzén; Johan Ottosson; Ann-Marie Svensson
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-01

10.  Effectiveness of Lilly Connected Care Program (LCCP) App-Based Diabetes Education for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Insulin: Retrospective Real-World Study.

Authors:  Xia Li; Zhiguang Zhou; Yiyu Zhang; Chaoyuan Liu; Shuoming Luo; Jin Huang
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.