Literature DB >> 30222576

The Effect of Focal Distance, Age, and Brightness on Near-Field Augmented Reality Depth Matching.

Gurjot Singh, Stephen R Ellis, J Edward Swan.   

Abstract

Many augmented reality (AR) applications operate within near-field reaching distances, and require matching the depth of a virtual object with a real object. The accuracy of this matching was measured in three experiments, which examined the effect of focal distance, age, and brightness, within distances of 33.3 to 50 cm, using a custom-built AR haploscope. Experiment I examined the effect of focal demand, at the levels of collimated (infinite focal distance), consistent with other depth cues, and at the midpoint of reaching distance. Observers were too young to exhibit age-related reductions in accommodative ability. The depth matches of collimated targets were increasingly overestimated with increasing distance, consistent targets were slightly underestimated, and midpoint targets were accurately estimated. Experiment II replicated Experiment I, with older observers. Results were similar to Experiment I. Experiment III replicated Experiment I with dimmer targets, using young observers. Results were again consistent with Experiment I, except that both consistent and midpoint targets were accurately estimated. In all cases, collimated results were explained by a model, where the collimation biases the eyes' vergence angle outwards by a constant amount. Focal demand and brightness affect near-field AR depth matching, while age-related reductions in accommodative ability have no effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30222576     DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2869729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph        ISSN: 1077-2626            Impact factor:   4.579


  5 in total

1.  The impact of visualization paradigms on the detectability of spatial misalignment in mixed reality surgical guidance.

Authors:  Wenhao Gu; Alejandro Martin-Gomez; Sue Min Cho; Greg Osgood; Bert Bracke; Chad Josewski; Jonathan Knopf; Mathias Unberath
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Multicenter assessment of augmented reality registration methods for image-guided interventions.

Authors:  Ningcheng Li; Jonathan Wakim; Yilun Koethe; Timothy Huber; Ryan Schenning; Terence P Gade; Stephen J Hunt; Brian J Park
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.313

Review 3.  Augmented and Mixed Reality: Technologies for Enhancing the Future of IR.

Authors:  Brian J Park; Stephen J Hunt; Charles Martin; Gregory J Nadolski; Bradford J Wood; Terence P Gade
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.464

4.  Smartphone- versus smartglasses-based augmented reality (AR) for percutaneous needle interventions: system accuracy and feasibility study.

Authors:  Ming Li; Reza Seifabadi; Dilara Long; Quirina De Ruiter; Nicole Varble; Rachel Hecht; Ayele H Negussie; Venkatesh Krishnasamy; Sheng Xu; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 5.  Augmenting Performance: A Systematic Review of Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays in Surgery.

Authors:  Mitchell Doughty; Nilesh R Ghugre; Graham A Wright
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-07-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.