Literature DB >> 30222167

Classical Short-Delay Eyeblink Conditioning in One-Year-Old Children.

Lucy K Goodman1, Nicola S Anstice2, Suzanne Stevens3, Benjamin Thompson4, Trecia A Wouldes5.   

Abstract

Classical eyeblink conditioning (EBC) refers to the learned association between a conditioned stimulus (an auditory tone) and an unconditioned stimulus (a puff of air to the cornea). Eyeblink conditioning is often used experimentally to detect abnormalities in cerebellar-dependent learning and memory that underlies this type of associative learning. While experiments in adults and older children are relatively simple to administer using commercial equipment, eyeblink conditioning in infants is more challenging due to their poor compliance, which makes correct positioning of the equipment difficult. To achieve conditioning in one-year-old infants, a custom-made or an adapted commercial system can be used to deliver the air puff to the infant's cornea. The main challenge lies in successfully detecting and classifying the behavioral responses. We report that automated blink detection methods are unreliable in this population, and that conditioning experiments should be analyzed using frame-by-frame analysis of supplementary video camera recordings. This method can be applied to study developmental changes in eyeblink conditioning and to examine whether this paradigm can detect children with neurological disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30222167      PMCID: PMC6235083          DOI: 10.3791/58037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  15 in total

1.  One-month-old human infants learn about the social world while they sleep.

Authors:  Bethany C Reeb-Sutherland; William P Fifer; Dana L Byrd; Elizabeth A D Hammock; Pat Levitt; Nathan A Fox
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-06-18

2.  Acquisition and differential conditioning of the eyelid response in normal and retarded children.

Authors:  E S Ohlrich; L E Ross
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1968-06

3.  Abnormal classical eye-blink conditioning in autism.

Authors:  L L Sears; P R Finn; J E Steinmetz
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1994-12

4.  Effect of delay interval on classical eyeblink conditioning in 5-month-old human infants.

Authors:  Dragana I Claflin; Mark E Stanton; Jane Herbert; Jennifer Greer; Carol O Eckerman; Dragana I Klaflin
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.038

Review 5.  Neural circuitry and plasticity mechanisms underlying delay eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Adam B Steinmetz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Eye-blink conditioning deficits indicate temporal processing abnormalities in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Amanda R Bolbecker; Crystal S Mehta; Chad R Edwards; Joseph E Steinmetz; Brian F O'Donnell; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Impaired eyeblink conditioning in children with fetal alcohol syndrome.

Authors:  Sandra W Jacobson; Mark E Stanton; Christopher D Molteno; Matthew J Burden; Douglas S Fuller; H Eugene Hoyme; Luther K Robinson; Nathaniel Khaole; Joseph L Jacobson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Classical conditioning and retention of the infant's eyelid response: effects of age and interstimulus interval.

Authors:  A H Little; L P Lipsitt; C Rovee-Collier
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1984-06

9.  Eyeblink classical conditioning in the preweanling lamb.

Authors:  Timothy B Johnson; Mark E Stanton; Charles R Goodlett; Timothy A Cudd
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Two attempts to condition eyelid responses in human infants.

Authors:  T Naito; L P Lipsitt
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1969-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Young Domestic Pigs (Sus scrofa) Can Perform Pavlovian Eyeblink Conditioning.

Authors:  Henk-Jan Boele; Sangyun Joung; Joanne E Fil; Austin T Mudd; Stephen A Fleming; Sebastiaan K E Koekkoek; Ryan N Dilger
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.558

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.