Literature DB >> 30219910

FA01.02: THE EFFECT OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AFTER MIE ON LONG-TERM SURVIVAL: A RETROSPECTIVE, MULTI-CENTER COHORT STUDY.

Laura Fransen1, Gijs Berkelmans1, Emanuele Asti2, Mark Van Berge Henegouwen3, Felix Berlth4, Luigi Bonavina2, Andrew Brown5, Christiane Bruns4, Suzanne Gisbertz3, Peter Grimminger6, Christian Gutschow7, Arnulf Hölscher4, Juha Kauppi8, Sjoerd M Lagarde9, Stuart Mercer10, Johnny Moons11, Philippe Nafteux11, Magnus Nilsson12, Francesco Palazzo5, Piet Pattyn13, Annouck Philippron13, Dimitri Raptis7, Jari Räsänen8, Ernest Rosato5, Ioannis Rouvelas12, Henner Schmidt7, Paul Schneider7, Wolfgang Schröder4, Bas P L Wijnhoven9, A P Grard2, Misha Luyer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy has a high incidence of postoperative morbidity. Complications lead to a decreased short-term survival, however the influence of those complications on long-term survival is still unclear. Most of the performed studies are small, single center cohort series with inconclusive or conflicting results. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been shown to be associated with a reduced postoperative morbidity. In this study, the influence of complications on long-term survival for patients with esophageal cancer undergoing a MIE were investigated.
METHODS: Data was collected from the EsoBenchmark database, a collaboration of 13 high-volume centers routinely performing MIE. Patients were included in this database from June 1, 2011 until May 31, 2016. Complications were scored according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification for surgical complications. Major complications were defined as a CD grade ≥ 3. The data were corrected for 90-day mortality to correct for the short-term effect of postoperative complications on mortality. Overall survival was analyzed using the Kaplan Meier, log rank- and (uni- and multivariable) Cox-regression analyses.
RESULTS: A total of 926 patients were eligible for analysis. Mean follow-up time was 30.8 months (SD 17.9). Complications occurred in 543 patients (59.2%) of which 39.3% had a major complication. Anastomotic leakage (AL) occurred in 135 patients (14.5%) of which 9.2% needed an intervention (CD grade ≥ 3). A significant worse long-term survival was observed in patients with any AL (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.29-2.32, P < 0.001) and for patients with AL CD grade ≥3 (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.32-2.63, P < 0.001). Major cardiac complications occurred in 18 patients (1.9%) and were related to a decreased long-term survival (HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.38-5.35, p 0.004). For all other complications, no significant influence on long-term survival was found.
CONCLUSION: The occurrence and severity of anastomotic leakage and cardiac complications after MIE negatively affect long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients. DISCLOSURE: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30219910     DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy089.FA01.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  3 in total

1.  Long-Term Quality of Life After Total Gastrectomy Versus Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.

Authors:  E Jezerskyte; L M Saadeh; E R C Hagens; M A G Sprangers; L Noteboom; H W M van Laarhoven; W J Eshuis; M I van Berge Henegouwen; S S Gisbertz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Minke L Feenstra; Lily Alkemade; Janneke E van den Bergh; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Freek Daams; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Wietse J Eshuis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.339

3.  Early versus the traditional start of oral intake following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Xiang Mei; Guan-Biao Liang; Lei Dai; Yong-Yong Wang; Ming-Wu Chen; Jun-Xian Mo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.359

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.