Sara Lappan1, Christopher B Thorne1, Dustin Long2, Peter S Hendricks1. 1. Department of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL. 2. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Smoking cessation treatments currently succeed at a rate of approximately 20%-30%, underscoring the importance of exploring factors that might increase intervention effectiveness. Although negative affect has been studied extensively in relation to smoking cessation, psychological well-being (PWB; eg, life satisfaction, optimism, positive affect, purpose in life) has received little attention. This study tested longitudinal and reciprocal relationships between PWB and smoking status in older adults. METHODS: Panel data were obtained from the biennial, longitudinal Health and Retirement Study. Using structural equation modeling, we developed cross-lagged models to examine the relationships of PWB in 2006 with smoking status in 2010 and of smoking status in 2006 with PWB in 2010 while controlling for covariates (Ns = 2939-4230, 55% women, 89% white, mean age = 64 years, mean years of education = 13, 25% smokers in 2006 and 21% smokers in 2010). Separate cross-lagged models were developed for each of the PWB variables: life satisfaction, optimism, positive affect, and purpose in life. RESULTS: Greater life satisfaction (standardized path coefficient = -0.04), optimism (standardized path coefficient = -0.07), and positive affect (standardized path coefficient = -0.08) in 2006 predicted a reduced likelihood of smoking in 2010. Being a smoker in 2006 predicted lower life satisfaction (standardized path coefficient = -0.25), optimism (standardized path coefficient = -0.10), positive affect (standardized path coefficient = -0.10), and purpose in life (standardized path coefficient = -0.13) in 2010. CONCLUSIONS: Findings warrant further exploration of the relationships between PWB and smoking, and support the incorporation of PWB-boosting components into existing treatments. IMPLICATIONS: Given the relatively low success rate of current smoking cessation treatments, the present results suggest that increasing PWB might promote abstinence and therefore warrant consideration as a focus of future cessation treatment research. Moreover, these results suggest that smoking might inhibit PWB, illuminating a negative consequence of smoking not previously identified. Helping smokers increase their PWB may benefit them beyond promoting cessation and contribute to a flourishing society. These results warrant further investigation of PWB and smoking, and support the continued evaluation of PWB-boosting components in smoking cessation treatments.
INTRODUCTION: Smoking cessation treatments currently succeed at a rate of approximately 20%-30%, underscoring the importance of exploring factors that might increase intervention effectiveness. Although negative affect has been studied extensively in relation to smoking cessation, psychological well-being (PWB; eg, life satisfaction, optimism, positive affect, purpose in life) has received little attention. This study tested longitudinal and reciprocal relationships between PWB and smoking status in older adults. METHODS: Panel data were obtained from the biennial, longitudinal Health and Retirement Study. Using structural equation modeling, we developed cross-lagged models to examine the relationships of PWB in 2006 with smoking status in 2010 and of smoking status in 2006 with PWB in 2010 while controlling for covariates (Ns = 2939-4230, 55% women, 89% white, mean age = 64 years, mean years of education = 13, 25% smokers in 2006 and 21% smokers in 2010). Separate cross-lagged models were developed for each of the PWB variables: life satisfaction, optimism, positive affect, and purpose in life. RESULTS: Greater life satisfaction (standardized path coefficient = -0.04), optimism (standardized path coefficient = -0.07), and positive affect (standardized path coefficient = -0.08) in 2006 predicted a reduced likelihood of smoking in 2010. Being a smoker in 2006 predicted lower life satisfaction (standardized path coefficient = -0.25), optimism (standardized path coefficient = -0.10), positive affect (standardized path coefficient = -0.10), and purpose in life (standardized path coefficient = -0.13) in 2010. CONCLUSIONS: Findings warrant further exploration of the relationships between PWB and smoking, and support the incorporation of PWB-boosting components into existing treatments. IMPLICATIONS: Given the relatively low success rate of current smoking cessation treatments, the present results suggest that increasing PWB might promote abstinence and therefore warrant consideration as a focus of future cessation treatment research. Moreover, these results suggest that smoking might inhibit PWB, illuminating a negative consequence of smoking not previously identified. Helping smokers increase their PWB may benefit them beyond promoting cessation and contribute to a flourishing society. These results warrant further investigation of PWB and smoking, and support the continued evaluation of PWB-boosting components in smoking cessation treatments.
Authors: Rosemarie Kobau; Martin E P Seligman; Christopher Peterson; Ed Diener; Matthew M Zack; Daniel Chapman; William Thompson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Sharon M Hall; Gary L Humfleet; Ricardo F Muñoz; Victor I Reus; Julie A Robbins; Judith J Prochaska Journal: Addiction Date: 2009-04-09 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Laura Sapranaviciute-Zabazlajeva; Dalia Luksiene; Dalia Virviciute; Martin Bobak; Abdonas Tamosiunas Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Ahmed Jamal; Elyse Phillips; Andrea S Gentzke; David M Homa; Stephen D Babb; Brian A King; Linda J Neff Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Säde Stenlund; Heli Koivumaa-Honkanen; Lauri Sillanmäki; Hanna Lagström; Päivi Rautava; Sakari Suominen Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Abdullah M M Alanazi; Mohammed M Alqahtani; Gregory Pavela; Eric W Ford; Adam M Leventhal; Peter S Hendricks Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Säde Stenlund; Heli Koivumaa-Honkanen; Lauri Sillanmäki; Hanna Lagström; Päivi Rautava; Sakari Suominen Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2021-11-14
Authors: Säde Stenlund; Niina Junttila; Heli Koivumaa-Honkanen; Lauri Sillanmäki; David Stenlund; Sakari Suominen; Hanna Lagström; Päivi Rautava Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 3.240