| Literature DB >> 30219821 |
Xiuli Yi1, Tingting Cui1, Shuli Li1, Yuqi Yang1, Jiaxi Chen1, Sen Guo1, Zhe Jian1, Chunying Li1, Tianwen Gao1, Ling Liu1, Kai Li1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple studies have implicated a role for CD8+T cell-mediated immune response to autoantigens in vitiligo. However, the antigen-specific T lymphocyte reactivity against the peptide epitopes is diverse among different world populations. This study aimed to identify the risk HLA-A allele in vitiligo and study CD8+ T cell reactivity to 5 autoantigenic peptides in Han Chinese populations, and to analyze the association of CD8+ T cell reactivity with disease characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHODS The risk HLA-A allele was analyzed by case-control study. Enzyme linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay was used to compare T cell reactivity to the 5 autoantigenic peptides between vitiligo patients and healthy controls, then we analyzed the association of CD8+ T cell reactivity to 2 positive peptides with disease activity and area of skin lesions. RESULTS The results indicated that the most frequent allele in the Han Chinese vitiligo patients was the HLA-A*02: 01 allele with a significantly higher frequency compared to controls (20.20% versus 13.79%, P=6.64×10-5). The most frequently encountered epitopes were 2 gp100 modified peptides, IMDQVPFSV and YLEPGPVTV, whereas a weak T cell reactivity against tyrosinase and Melan-A/MART-1 were evaluated. Moreover, we demonstrated that T cell reactivity against the 2 positive peptides was significantly associated with disease characteristics including disease activity and area of skin lesions. CONCLUSIONS Our findings showed that the HLA-A*02: 01 allele was the major risk HLA-A allele, and 2 gp100 modified peptides were identified as autoantigens and were found to be closely related to disease characteristics which might play a critical role in Han Chinese vitiligo patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30219821 PMCID: PMC6154310 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.910515
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants.
| Vitiligo patients (n=42) | Healthy controls (n=32) | |
|---|---|---|
| Range of age in months, mean (SD) | 11–74, 32.9 (15) | 13–67, 32.09 (14.6) |
| Gender, n (%) | ||
| Male | 24 (57) | 20 (62) |
| Female | 18 (43) | 12 (38) |
| Range of disease during in months, Mean (SD) | 1–324, 96.71 (109.83) | NA |
| Disease of activity of vitiligo, n (%) | NA | |
| Stable (no progress in past 3 months) | 20 (47.6) | NA |
| Active (rapidly progress within 3 months) | 22 (52.4) | NA |
| The area of skin lesions, n (%) | NA | |
| <5% | 21 (50) | NA |
| 5–50% | 17 (40.5) | NA |
| >50% | 4 (9.5) | NA |
NA – not applicable; SD – standard deviation.
Peptides used for the detection of specifically reactive cytotoxic T cells.
| Peptide sequence | Protein | Position | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|
| YMDGTMSQV | Tyrosinase, 3D (modified) | 369–377 | Human |
| IMDQVPFSV | gp100, 2M (modified) | 209–217 | Human |
| YLEPGPVTV | gp100, 9V (modified) | 280–288 | Human |
| ELAGIGILTV | MART-1, 2L (modified) | 26–35 | Human |
| EAAGIGILTV | MART-1 | 26–35 | Human |
Figure 1HLA-A alleles in Han Chinese vitiligo populations. The HLA-A*02: 01 allele (20.20%) accounted for the most frequency in patients, followed by: HLA-A*11: 01 (19.02%), HLA-A*24: 02 (8.63%), HLA-A*30: 01 (8.63%), HLA-A*02: 06 (7.25%), and HLA-A*03: 01 (6.47%).
HLA-A alleles demonstrated significant differences in vitiligo patients compared with healthy controls from Han Chinese populations.
| HLA-A allele | Vitiligo | Controls | Vitiligo versus healthy controls | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. (%) | No. (%) | 1 P-value | ||
| A*02: 01 | 103 (20.20) | 2947 (13.79) | 6.64×10−5 | 1.58 (1.27–1.97) |
| A*11: 01 | 97 (19.02) | 3970 (18.57) | 0.778 | 1.03 (0.82–1.29) |
| A*24: 02 | 44 (8.63) | 3633 (15.73) | 8.02×10−7 | 0.46 (0.34–0.63) |
| A*30: 01 | 44 (8.63) | 1426 (6.67) | 0.084 | 1.32 (0.97–1.81) |
| A*02: 06 | 37 (7.25) | 1213 (5.67) | 0.143 | 1.3 (0.93–1.83) |
| A*03: 01 | 33 (6.47) | 687 (3.21) | 7.42×10−5 | 2.08 (1.45–2.99) |
| A*33: 03 | 28 (5.49) | 1717 (8.03) | 0.042 | 0.67 (0.45–0.98) |
| A*02: 07 | 24 (4.70) | 1568 (7.33) | 0.028 | 0.62 (0.41–0.94) |
| A*31: 01 | 20 (3.92) | 775 (3.63) | 0.731 | 1.09 (0.69–1.71) |
| A*01: 01 | 18 (3.53) | 766 (3.58) | 0.986 | 0.98 (0.61–1.58) |
| A*02: 05 | 7 (3.33) | 56 (0.26) | 0.001 | 5.3 (2.4–11.7) |
| A*26: 01 | 13 (2.54) | 582 (2.72) | 1.000 | 0.94 (0.54–1.63) |
| A*02: 03 | 6 (1.18) | 521 (2.44) | 0.077 | 0.48 (0.21–1.07) |
| A*68: 01 | 6 (1.18) | 172 (0.80) | 0.314 | 1.47 (0.65–3.33) |
| A*11: 02 | 5 (0.98) | 351 (1.64) | 0.29 | 0.59 (0.24–1.44) |
| A*02: 10 | 4 (0.78) | 91 (0.43) | 0.287 | 1.85 (0.68–5.05) |
| A*32: 01 | 3 (0.59) | 322 (1.51) | 0.095 | 0.39 (0.12–1.21) |
| A*03: 02 | 3 (0.59) | 50 (0.23) | 0.126 | 2.52 (0.79–8.12) |
| A*66: 01 | 2 (0.39) | 19 (0.09) | 0.085 | 4.43 (1.03–19.05) |
| A*02: 09 | 2 (0.39) | 14 (0.07) | 0.052 | 6.01 (1.36–26.5) |
| A*24: 04 | 2 (0.39) | 8 (0.04) | 0.022 | 10.52 (2.23–49.65) |
| A*24: 20 | 1 (0.20) | 68 (0.32) | 1.000 | 0.62 (0.09–4.44) |
| A*23: 01 | 1 (0.20) | 50 (0.23) | 1.000 | 0.84 (0.12–6.08) |
| A*11: 03 | 1 (0.20) | 18 (0.08) | 0.361 | 2.33 (0.31–17.5) |
| A*30: 04 | 1 (0.20) | 16 (0.07) | 0.33 | 2.62 (0.35–19.82) |
| A*30: 11 | 1 (0.20) | 6 (0.03) | 0.152 | 7 (0.84–58.23) |
| A*26: 03 | 1 (0.20) | 5 (0.02) | 0.132 | 8.4 (0.98–72.01) |
CI – confidence interval; OR – odds ratio.
P-value was calculated by using Chi-squared test.
Figure 2Ex vivo ELISPOT assays for 5 antigenic peptides in HLA-A*02: 01 vitiligo patients. Patient PBMCs (2×105 per well) were cultured directly on the ELISPOT plate with 5 antigenic peptides (10 μg/mL) respectively, including tyrosinase 369–377.3D (YMDGTMSQV), gpl00 209–217.2M (IMDQVPFSV), gpl00 280–288.9V (YLEPGPVTV), MART-1 26–35.2L (ELAGIGILTV), and MART-l 26–35 (EAAGIGILTV.) Plates were developed 48 hours later and detected by ELISPOT assays. The CD3 antibody was served as positive control, and HIV Gag: 77–85 (SLYNTVATL) as irrelevant control. Each group was set up in triplicate. The significant difference reactivity to the melanocyte antigens demonstrated between vitiligo patients and healthy controls. ** P<0.01. Non-parametric student’s t-test, P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Figure 3Association of disease characteristics and CD8+ T cell reactivity to 2 modified gp100 peptides. (A) There were significantly stronger reactivity of active vitiligo patients against the gp100 209–217,2M (IMDQVPFSV) than stable patients (* P<0.05). (B) The significantly stronger reactivity was detected against the gp100 280–288.9V (YLEPGPVTV) in active vitiligo patients than stable patients (**P<0.01). (C) There was significantly stronger CD8+ T cell reactivity against gp100 209–217.2M (IMDQVPFSV) in vitiligo patients with less than 5% skin lesions than vitiligo patients with more than 5% skin lesions (* P<0.05). (D) Vitiligo patients with skin lesions of less than 5% encountered significantly stronger reactivity against the gp100 280–288.9V (YLEPGPVTV) than vitiligo patients with more than 5% skin lesions (* P<0.05). Non-parametric student’s t-test.