Literature DB >> 19624290

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of skeletal metastases in patients with prostate cancer.

R Venkitaraman1, G J R Cook, D P Dearnaley, C C Parker, V Khoo, R Eeles, R A Huddart, A Horwich, S A Sohaib.   

Abstract

Whole-body MRI is an effective method for evaluating the entire skeletal system in patients with metastatic disease. This study aimed to compare whole-body MRI and radionuclide bone scintigraph in the detection of skeletal metastases in patients with prostate cancer. Patients with prostate cancer at high risk of skeletal metastasis with (i) prostate-specific antigen of > or =50 ng/mL; (ii) composite Gleason score of > or =8 with prostate-specific antigen of >20 ng/mL; or (iii) node-positive disease were enrolled in this prospective study before systemic treatment was initiated. Whole-body MR images and bone scans of 39 patients were analysed. Seven patients had bone metastases on bone scans, while seven patients had skeletal metastases by whole-body MRI, with concordant findings only in four patients. Compared with the 'gold standard', derived from clinical and radiological follow-up, the sensitivity for both bone scans and MRI was 70%, and the specificity for both was 100%. Magnetic resonance imaging detected 26 individual lesions compared with 18 lesions on bone scans. Only eight lesions were positive on both. Bone scans detected more rib metastases, while MRI identified more metastatic lesions in the spine. Whole-body MRI and radionuclide bone scintigraphy have similar specificity and sensitivity and may be used as complementary investigations to detect skeletal metastases from prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19624290     DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02070.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1754-9477            Impact factor:   1.735


  26 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: Bone Scan Index made easy, at last.

Authors:  Bertrand Tombal
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Detection of recurrent prostate carcinoma with anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid PET/CT and 111In-capromab pendetide SPECT/CT.

Authors:  David M Schuster; Bital Savir-Baruch; Peter T Nieh; Viraj A Master; Raghuveer K Halkar; Peter J Rossi; Melinda M Lewis; Jonathon A Nye; Weiping Yu; F DuBois Bowman; Mark M Goodman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Imaging of distant metastases of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Pesapane; Marcin Czarniecki; Matteo Basilio Suter; Baris Turkbey; Geert Villeirs
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 4.  Unmet needs in the prediction and detection of metastases in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Oliver Sartor; Mario Eisenberger; Michael W Kattan; Bertrand Tombal; Frederic Lecouvet
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-05-06

Review 5.  Diagnosis of bone metastases: a meta-analysis comparing ¹⁸FDG PET, CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Hui-Lin Yang; Tao Liu; Xi-Ming Wang; Yong Xu; Sheng-Ming Deng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Comparison of choline-PET/CT, MRI, SPECT, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guohua Shen; Houfu Deng; Shuang Hu; Zhiyun Jia
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Comparison of PSMA-PET/CT, choline-PET/CT, NaF-PET/CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Zhou; Zhengxing Gou; Renhui Wu; Yuan Yuan; Guiquan Yu; Yigang Zhao
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Rib tumors: a 15-year experience.

Authors:  Timothy Sakellaridis; Stylianos Gaitanakis; Anastasios Piyis
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-03-11

9.  Value of a Dixon-based MR/PET attenuation correction sequence for the localization and evaluation of PET-positive lesions.

Authors:  Matthias Eiber; Axel Martinez-Möller; Michael Souvatzoglou; Konstantin Holzapfel; Anja Pickhard; Dennys Löffelbein; Ivan Santi; Ernst J Rummeny; Sibylle Ziegler; Markus Schwaiger; Stephan G Nekolla; Ambros J Beer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Diagnostic imaging to detect and evaluate response to therapy in bone metastases from prostate cancer: current modalities and new horizons.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Francesco Bertoldo; Francesco Boccardo; Giario Conti; Ilario Menchi; Francesco Mungai; Umberto Ricardi; Emilio Bombardieri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.