| Literature DB >> 30217175 |
Wei Wu1, Wei-Lun Ng1, Jun-Xin Yang2, Wei-Ming Li3, Xue-Jun Ge4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Species delimitation is a challenging but essential task in conservation biology. Morphologically similar species are sometimes difficult to recognize even after examination by experienced taxonomists. With the advent of molecular approaches in species delimitation, this hidden diversity has received much recent attention. In addition to DNA barcoding approaches, analytical tools based on the multi-species coalescence model (MSC) have been developed for species delimitation. Musa itinerans is widely distributed in subtropical Asia, and at least six varieties have been documented. However, the number of evolutionarily distinct lineages remains unknown.Entities:
Keywords: Crop wild relatives (CWRs); Genome resequencing; Musa; Species delimitation
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30217175 PMCID: PMC6137913 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-018-1410-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Sampling information and population structure. (a) Sampling locations of Musa itinerans varieties used in this study: LC, Lecang, Guangdong; CH, Conghua, Guangdong; YC, Guangdong; HN, Hainan; The distributions of M. itinerans are outlined by green circles; (b) Morphological characters of M. itinerans varieties; (c) Plots of membership clusters for varieties of M. itinerans using genome wide single nucleotide polymorphism data implemented with fastSTRUCTURE. (d) Principal components analysis of four geographic populations of M. itinerans based on the same genome-wide dataset
Fig. 2Genome diversity among the four varieties of Musa itinerans. (a) The distributions of average pairwise nucleotide diversity θπ, Tajima’s D, Wright’s fixation index F and absolute genetic divergence D across chromosome 1 with an overlapped window size of 20 kb and a step size of 2 kb for four varieties of Musa itinerans; (b) Boxplots shown for the overall θπ, Tajima’s D, Wright’s fixation index F and absolute genetic divergence D for four varieties of M. itinerans
Sample location information for specimens used in this study
| Taxon (abbreviation) | Location | Coordinate (Altitude: a.s.l) | Sample size | Voucher specimens |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jianfengling National Park, Ledong, Hainan | 18°43’N, 108°50′E (770 m) | 8 | Ge201301 | |
| Baiyong Preserve Yangcun, Guangdong | 22°23’N, 111°39′E (90 m) | 3 | Ge201302 | |
| Shimen National Park, Conghua, Guangdong | 23°38’N, 113°46′E (200 m) | 4 | Ge201303 | |
| Lechang Gorge, Lechang, Guangdong | 25°08’N, 113°17′E (150 m) | 6 | Ge201304 | |
| Beixiang, Lechang, Guangdong | 25°20’N, 113°21′E (840 m) | 3 | Ge201305 |
The mean genome-wide genetic differentiation among four varieties of Musa itinerans var. itinerans (Mit), M. itinerans var. guangdongensis (Mgd), M. itinerans var. chinensis (Mch), and M. itinerans var. lechangensis (Mlc) in South China. The triangular values above show absolute genetic divergence and bellows show the genetic differentiation index F
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.0009 | 0.0009 | 0.0009 | |
|
| 0.29 | 0.0008 | 0.0008 | |
|
| 0.26 | 0.14 | 0.0008 | |
|
| 0.41 | 0.31 | 0.24 |
Fig. 3Species delimitation for Musa itinerans varieties using Bayesian phylogenetics and phylogeography (BP&P) based on 123 single copy nuclear loci. (a) Specie tree estimation: the top four species trees and their posterior probabilities with a total probability of 0.5, and population sizes with Gamma priors θ ~ G (2, 1000) for all populations and divergence times with Gamma priors τ ~ G (2, 2000) for the root age. The abbreviations for different varieties or geographical populations are as follow: Mit: Musa itinerans var. itinerans; Mlc: Musa itinerans var. lechangensis; Mch: Musa itinerans var. chinensis; Mgd1: Musa itinerans var. guangdongensis (population Yangchun, Guangdong); Mgd2: Musa itinerans var. guangdongensis (population Lechang, Guangdong); (b) species delimitation on guide tree: above and below the branches are the posterior speciation probabilities, population sizes are shown on every node, the 95% highest posterior density (HPD) for divergence time are in the brackets and are highlighted using horizontal grey bars. Two geographical populations of M. itinerans var. guangdongensis were lumped with weak posterior probability, the splits of other varieties were supported with high posterior probabilities
Introgression four population tests of varieties of Musa itinerans
| JK-Da | V (JK-D)b | Z-scorec | nABBA | nBABA | nBlocks | dFour populations | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −0.19 | 0.000069 | −31.81 | 0 | 116,130.9 | 171,401.0 | 97 | (( |
| −0.08 | 0.000041 | −12.28 | 0 | 140,626.9 | 164,749.7 | 97 | (( |
| −0.15 | 0.000059 | −19.63 | 0 | 119,522.4 | 161,999.8 | 97 | (( |
| 0.04 | 0.000054 | 5.33 | 0 | 149,391.0 | 138,090.1 | 97 | (( |
aJK-D denotes the mean value of Jackknife bootstrapping;
bV(JK-D) denotes the variance of JK-D;
cZ scores > 3 are considered significant evidence of a nonzero D-statistic value, consistent with the presence of admixture; given phylogeny (((P1, P2), P3), O)), positive D-statistic values are indicative of gene flow between P2 and P3; negative values are indicative of gene flow between P1 and P3
dMch: M. itinerans var. chinensis, Mgd: M. itinerans var. guangdongensis, Mlc: M. itinerans var. lechangensis, Mit: M. itinerans var. itinerans, O: outgroup, M. basjoo
Fig. 4Bayesian factor species delimitation for Musa itinerans varieties using 1201 unlinked loci. (a) the five taxa species tree determined by the most marginal likelihood estimates of different species models. Bayesian posterior probability, ancestral population size, divergence time are separated by two slashes; the 95% highest posterior density (HPD) for divergence times are highlighted using horizontal grey bars; (b) DensiTree shown for all trees of the Markov chain Monte Carlo method with a burn-in of 5000 trees, and higher levels of uncertainty are represented by lower densities
BFD* species delimitations for the varieties of Musa itinerans
| Model | Species Number | MLE | Rank | BF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RunD, | 4 | − 3667.1 | 4 | – |
| RunB, | 2 | − 3649.5 | 2 | −35.2 |
| RunC, | 3 | − 3722.4 | 3 | 54.9 |
| RunE, two populations of | 5 | − 3626.4 | 1 | −81.4 |
Bayes factor (BF) calculations were made against the current taxonomy model (RunD), positive BF values indicate support for the current taxonomy model, and negative BF values indicate support for the alternative model