Literature DB >> 30216634

Thrombospondin 1 and cathepsin D improve prostate cancer diagnosis by avoiding potentially unnecessary prostate biopsies.

Thomas Steuber1, Pierre Tennstedt1, Annalisa Macagno2, Alcibiade Athanasiou2, Anja Wittig2, Ramy Huber2, Bruno Golding2, Ralph Schiess2, Silke Gillessen3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate and further validate if two novel cancer-related glycoproteins, discovered by a genetic-guided proteomics approach, can distinguish benign disease from prostate cancer (PCa) in men with enlarged prostates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed that included men with a total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration of 2.0-10 ng/mL, negative digital rectal examination and enlarged prostate (volume ≥35 mL). Serum samples were collected between 2011 and 2016 at a single centre from 474 men before they underwent prostate biopsy. Serum concentrations of thrombospondin 1 (THBS1) and cathepsin D (CTSD) glycoproteins were combined with the percentage of free PSA to total PSA ratio (%fPSA) to predict any or significant cancer at biopsy.
RESULTS: The multivariable logistic regression model including THBS1, CTSD and %fPSA discriminated among biopsy-positive and biopsy-negative patients in the validation set with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-0.91), while %fPSA alone showed an AUC of 0.64 (P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.57-0.71). At 90% sensitivity for PCa, the specificity of the model was 62%, while %fPSA had a specificity of 23%. For high grade (Gleason score ≥ 7 in prostatectomy specimen) PCa, the specificity was 48% at 90% sensitivity, with an AUC of 0.83, (P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.88). Limitations of the study include the retrospective set-up and single-centre cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: A model combining two cancer-related glycoproteins (THBS1 and CTSD) and %fPSA can improve PCa diagnosis and may reduce the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies because of its improved specificity for PCa when compared to %fPSA alone.
© 2018 The Authors BJU International © 2018 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  #ProstateCancer; biomarkers; cathepsin D; prostate-specific antigen; thrombospondin 1

Year:  2018        PMID: 30216634     DOI: 10.1111/bju.14540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  9 in total

Review 1.  Proteomic discovery of non-invasive biomarkers of localized prostate cancer using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Amanda Khoo; Lydia Y Liu; Julius O Nyalwidhe; O John Semmes; Danny Vesprini; Michelle R Downes; Paul C Boutros; Stanley K Liu; Thomas Kislinger
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Comparison of Proclarix, PSA Density and MRI-ERSPC Risk Calculator to Select Patients for Prostate Biopsy after mpMRI.

Authors:  Miriam Campistol; Juan Morote; Marina Triquell; Lucas Regis; Ana Celma; Inés de Torres; María E Semidey; Richard Mast; Anna Santamaría; Jacques Planas; Enrique Trilla
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  All change in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.

Authors:  Derek J Lomas; Hashim U Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Use of MS-GUIDE for identification of protein biomarkers for risk stratification of patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sandra Goetze; Peter Schüffler; Alcibiade Athanasiou; Anika Koetemann; Cedric Poyet; Christian Daniel Fankhauser; Peter J Wild; Ralph Schiess; Bernd Wollscheid
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 5.000

5.  Analytical performance of thrombospondin-1 and cathepsin D immunoassays part of a novel CE-IVD marked test as an aid in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Annalisa Macagno; Alcibiade Athanasiou; Anja Wittig; Ramy Huber; Stephan Weber; Thomas Keller; Martin Rhiel; Bruno Golding; Ralph Schiess
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Blood-Derived Biomarkers of Diagnosis, Prognosis and Therapy Response in Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Katalin Balázs; Lilla Antal; Géza Sáfrány; Katalin Lumniczky
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-04-13

7.  Development and validation of a novel multivariate risk score to guide biopsy decision for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Helmut Klocker; Bruno Golding; Stephan Weber; Eberhard Steiner; Pierre Tennstedt; Thomas Keller; Ralph Schiess; Silke Gillessen; Wolfgang Horninger; Thomas Steuber
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2020-03-12

8.  The Efficacy of Proclarix to Select Appropriate Candidates for Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Derived Prostate Biopsies in Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Juan Morote; Miriam Campistol; Anna Celma; Lucas Regis; Inés de Torres; María E Semidey; Sarai Roche; Richard Mast; Anna Santamaría; Jacques Planas; Enrique Trilla
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 5.400

Review 9.  Biomarkers for prostate cancer detection and risk stratification.

Authors:  Mark W Farha; Simpa S Salami
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-06-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.