| Literature DB >> 30216387 |
Malgorzata Bukowiecka-Matusiak1, Izabela Burzynska-Pedziwiatr1, Anna Sansone2, Beata Malachowska3, Monika Zurawska-Klis4, Carla Ferreri2, Chryssostomos Chatgilialoglu2, Tomasz Ochedalski5, Katarzyna Cypryk4, Lucyna Alicja Wozniak1.
Abstract
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a glucose intolerance that begins or is first recognized during pregnancy. It is currently a growing health problem worldwide affecting from 1% to 14% of all pregnant women depending on racial and ethnic group as well as the diagnostic and screening criteria. Our preliminary study aimed at investigating the erythrocyte membrane fatty acid profiles of pregnant women, in particular with diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and with normal glucose tolerant (NGT) pregnant women as a control group. The study group comprised 43 pregnant women, 32 of whom were diagnosed with GDM according to the WHO criteria, and 11 with normal glucose tolerance. The erythrocyte membrane phospholipids were obtained according to the Folch extraction procedure. Fatty acids (FA) were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) as the corresponding fatty acid methyl esters (FAME). A cluster of 14 fatty acids identified contained >98% of the recognized peaks in the GC analysis. The analysis of fatty acids from erythrocytes revealed important differences between GDM and NGT women in the third trimester, and the results were correlated with biochemical data. Among the 14 measured FA representing the membrane lipidomic profile, the levels of three saturated FA (myristic, palmitic, stearic acids) tended to decrease in GDM patients, with the percentage content of stearic acid significantly changed. The relative content of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) tended to increase, in particular the oleic acid and vaccenic acid contents were significantly increased in erythrocyte membranes of the GDM group in comparison with the NGT group. The GDM group demonstrated higher sapienic acid levels (+29%) but this change was not statistically significant. This study revealed association between an impaired cis-vaccenic acid concentration in erythrocytes membrane and GDM development. No significant changes of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) were observed in GDM and NGT erythrocytes. We postulate, basing on the differences between the GDM and NGT lipidomic profiles, that stearic and cis-vaccenic acids can be considered as dual biomarkers of specific SFA-MUFA conversion pathway, involving the coupling of delta-9 desaturase and elongase enzymes. Our results indicate that the SFA-MUFA families may be involved in the pathophysiology of metabolic diseases such as GDM, but the further studies are needed to confirm our hypothesis. In conclusion, the erythrocyte membranes of GDM women undergo remodeling resulting in abnormal fatty acid profiles, which are reflection of the long-term status of organism and can have great impact on both the mother and her offspring.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30216387 PMCID: PMC6138398 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203799
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Biochemical and clinical parameters of the GDM and NGT groups.
| GDM | NGT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 31.0 (28–35) | 29.0 (28–30) | 0.1144 |
| BMI [kg/m2] | 23.7 (21.4–26.3) | 20.9 (20.4–21.3) | 0.0258 |
| FPG [mg/dL] | 85.0 (79.0–92.0) | 77.5 (75.1–84.0) | 0.0616 |
| 160.0 (153.0–172.0) | 99.6 (88.8–100.9) | ||
| 3.5 (2.3–8.3) | 1.5 (1.1–2.5) | ||
| Insulin [μU/mL] | 10.7 (6.6–19.8) | 13.9 (7–15.5) | 0.7746 |
| HOMA-IR | 2.0 (1.5–3.8) | 2.3 (1.3–3.2) | 0.5899 |
| HOMA-ß | 203.3 (119.5–241.9) | 287.3 (208.5–344.0) | 0.0573 |
| QUICKI | 0.34 (0.032–0.37) | 0.34 (0.31–0.36) | 0.5899 |
| 259.9 (233.3–283.4) | 219.5 (191.5–242.0) | ||
| HDL [mg/dL] | 74.1 (57.0–86.0) | 61.4 (53.9–67.1) | 0.0802 |
| LDL [mg/dL] | 141.0 (116.0–173) | 119.0 (105.0–139.0) | 0.1567 |
| 215.9 (165.5–251.5) | 157.6 (116.5–203.9) |
* Median with IQR
IQR- interquartile range
BMI–body mass index; FPG–fasting plasma glucose; OGTT–oral glucose tolerance test; CRP–C reactive protein; HOMA-IR—homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HOMA- β–homeostasis model assessment of beta cells; QUICKI–quantitative insulin sensitivity check index; HDL—high-density lipoprotein; LDL—low-density lipoprotein; TG—triglycerides.
Erythrocyte membrane lipidomic profile using 14 fatty acids as a representative cluster.
| Fatty acid | GDM | NGT | Δ(%) | FDR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myristic (C14:0) | 0.16 (0.13–0.21) | 0.17 (0.14–0.21) | -6% | 0.5735 | 0.7299 |
| Palmitic (C16:0) | 16.87 (16.34–17.39) | 17.35 (16.08–17.47) | -3% | 0.4496 | 0.7254 |
| 11.75 (10.99–12.31) | 12.13 (11.94–12.87) | ||||
| Sapienic (C16:1) | 0.21 (0.11–0.34) | 0.15 (0.13–0.17) | +29% | 0.1041 | 0.4573 |
| Palmitoleic (C16:1(9 | 0.24 (0.19–0.48) | 0.23 (0.12–0.48) | +4% | 0.4663 | 0.7254 |
| Oleic (C18:1 (9cis)) | 18.25 (17.72–19.22) | 18.65 (17.78–19.47) | -2% | 0.6507 | 0.7591 |
| 1.28 (1.15–1.49) | 1.10 (0.96–1.18) | ||||
| Linoleic (C18:2 (9,12)) | 13.04 (11.79–14.03) | 13.47 (12.80–14.78) | -3% | 0.2521 | 0.5769 |
| Alpha-linolenic (C18:2 (9,12,15)) | 0.49 (0.40–0.61) | 0.41 (0.35–0.47) | +16% | 0.1307 | 0.4573 |
| Gamma-linolenic (C18:3 (6,9,12)) | 2.51 (2.27–2.92) | 2.13 (1.94–2.96) | +15% | 0.1986 | 0.5561 |
| Arachidonic (C20:4 (5,8,11,14)) | 22.33 (21.18–23.66) | 21.25 (20.33–23.11) | +5% | 0.2885 | 0.5769 |
| Eicosapentanoic–EPA (C20:5 (5,8,11,14,17)). | 1.02 (0.75–1.22) | 1.12 (0.85–1.22) | -10% | 0.9454 | 0.9672 |
| Docosapentaenoic–DPA C22:5(7,10,13,16,19) | 3.60 (3.24–4.00) | 3.70 (3.25–4.06) | -3% | 0.5365 | 0.7299 |
| Docosahexaenoic–DHA (C22:6 (4,7,10,13,16,19)) | 7.71 (6.29–8.50) | 7.52 (4.67–9.62) | +2% | 0.9672 | 0.9672 |
Fatty acids are reported as relative percentages of fatty acid methyl esters (% rel.) obtained by gas chromatographic analysis and calibration procedure, after erythrocyte membrane isolation and work-up as previously reported.18 See Methods for the experimental details.
*—Median with IQR
**-Differences between GDM and NGT groups
Spearman’s correlation coefficient between clinical data and fatty acids concentration in erythrocyte membranes in the GDM and NGT group.
| Vaccenic acid | Stearic acid | Sapienic acid | Alpha-linolenic acid | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDM | Control | GDM | Control | GDM | Control | GDM | Control | |||||||||
| R | R | R | R | R | R | R | R | |||||||||
| 0.00 | 1.0000 | -0.12 | 0.5260 | -0.36 | 0.4852 | 0.00 | 1.0000 | 0.15 | 0.4260 | -0.60 | 0.2103 | |||||
| 0.50 | 0.3910 | -0.17 | 0.4033 | 0.30 | 0.6238 | 0.21 | 0.2830 | -0.70 | 0.1881 | 0.15 | 0.4471 | -0.60 | 0.2848 | |||
| 0.11 | 0.5948 | -0.35 | 0.3558 | 0.11 | 0.5853 | -0.42 | 0.2646 | 0.14 | 0.4826 | -0.25 | 0.5165 | |||||
| -0.07 | 0.7272 | -0.14 | 0.7872 | -0.15 | 0.4721 | 0.04 | 0.8525 | -0.60 | 0.2080 | 0.13 | 0.5113 | 0.26 | 0.6228 | |||
| -0.03 | 0.8836 | 0.05 | 0.7712 | -0.50 | 0.1705 | 0.05 | 0.7794 | 0.03 | 0.9322 | 0.01 | 0.9416 | 0.07 | 0.8647 | |||
| 0.05 | 0.8065 | -0.11 | 0.5958 | -0.48 | 0.1875 | 0.17 | 0.4008 | 0.20 | 0.6059 | -0.01 | 0.9542 | 0.12 | 0.7650 | |||
| HOMA-B | -0.07 | 0.7188 | -0.37 | 0.4685 | 0.25 | 0.2045 | 0.14 | 0.7872 | 0.04 | 0.8418 | 0.09 | 0.8717 | -0.00 | 0.9904 | 0.14 | 0.7872 |
| -0.05 | 0.8065 | 0.11 | 0.5958 | 0.48 | 0.1875 | -0.17 | 0.4008 | -0.20 | 0.6059 | 0.01 | 0.9542 | -0.12 | 0.7650 | |||
| CRP [mg/dL] | -0.29 | 0.1085 | -0.33 | 0.3807 | 0.03 | 0.8683 | -0.17 | 0.6682 | -0.10 | 0.6076 | 0.05 | 0.8984 | 0.22 | 0.2279 | -0.07 | 0.8647 |
| Total Cholesterol [mg/dL] | -0.02 | 0.9091 | -0.32 | 0.4064 | 0.24 | 0.1967 | 0.07 | 0.8647 | -0.14 | 0.4661 | 0.18 | 0.6368 | 0.08 | 0.6726 | -0.17 | 0.6682 |
| HDL [mg/dL] | 0.00 | 1.0000 | -0.22 | 0.5755 | -0.23 | 0.2215 | -0.04 | 0.8438 | 0.42 | 0.2646 | 0.14 | 0.4687 | 0.05 | 0.8984 | ||
| -0.09 | 0.6113 | -0.23 | 0.5457 | -0.02 | 0.9661 | -0.22 | 0.2274 | 0.12 | 0.7650 | -0.06 | 0.7678 | -0.08 | 0.8312 | |||
| 0.24 | 0.2030 | 0.05 | 0.7712 | 0.30 | 0.4328 | 0.18 | 0.3419 | -0.13 | 0.7324 | 0.14 | 0.4594 | -0.37 | 0.3317 | |||
*-Assessed before pregnancy
BMI—body mass index; HbA1C —glycated hemoglobin; HOMA-IR—homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HOMA- β homeostasis model of assessment of beta cell function.
Multiple linear regression coefficient between clinical data and fatty acids concentration in erythrocyte membranes in the GDM and NGT.
| Vaccenic acid | Stearic acid | Sapienic acid | Alpha-linolenic acid | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | p | Beta | p | Beta | p | Beta | p | |
| -0.20 | 0.5976 | -0.06 | 0.8688 | |||||
| 0.17 | 0.2948 | -0.14 | 0.5026 | 0.34 | 0.1066 | 0.23 | 0.1248 | |
| -0.30 | 0.2709 | -0.01 | 0.9638 | |||||
| -0.33 | 0.1008 | 0.24 | 0.3168 | -0.05 | 0.8454 | |||
| -0.30 | 0.1759 | -0.16 | 0.5491 | 0.39 | 0.1563 | |||
| -0.47 | 0.2394 | 0.05 | 0.9068 | |||||
| 0.28 | 0.1274 | -0.19 | 0.3866 | 0.03 | 0.8748 | |||
| -0.23 | 0.3187 | 0.13 | 0.6524 | 0.01 | 0.9855 | -0.24 | 0.2395 | |
| -0.24 | 0.1945 | 0.19 | 0.4021 | 0.05 | 0.8309 | -0.22 | 0.1904 | |
Fig 1Possible influence of GDM on pathway of metabolic transformation of palmitic acid to cis-vaccenic, sapienic and oleic acids [30].