Literature DB >> 30215103

[Time trends of occupational differences in smoking behaviour of employed men and women in Germany : Results of the 1999-2013 microcensus].

Benjamin Kuntz1, Lars Eric Kroll2, Jens Hoebel2, Maria Schumann2, Johannes Zeiher3, Anne Starker3, Thomas Lampert2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies show that people with a low occupational status are more likely to smoke than those with a high occupational status. Against the background of a general decline in tobacco consumption, time trends of occupational differences in smoking behaviour of employed men and women in Germany were examined.
METHODS: The analyses were based on the last five waves of the German microcensus that included questions about smoking (1999, 2003, 2005, 2009 and 2013), taking only employed men and women aged 18-64 years into account (n = 688,746). Information on occupational position was summarised using international classifications of occupation (ISEI-08 and ISCO-08). Raw and model-based standardized prevalence estimates of current smoking were calculated.
RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2013, the proportion of smokers in the working population fell from 39.9 to 34.4% (men) and from 30.6 to 26.8% (women). Differences between occupational status groups increased significantly: while the prevalence of smoking among employees with high occupational status decreased, it remained largely stable in the low status group. In 2013, the occupations with the highest proportion of smokers were waste disposal workers, cleaning staff, unskilled workers, truck and bus drivers, salespeople and cashiers, and employees in the catering industry.
CONCLUSION: Since the beginning of the 2000s, the prevalence of smoking in the working population has declined. The strengthened tobacco control policy - e. g. the establishment of smoke-free workplace laws - might have contributed to this trend. In the context of workplace health promotion, tobacco prevention and cessation measures should be targeted at those professions in which smoking is still particularly common.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Germany; Occupational position; Smoking; Social inequality; Tobacco

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30215103     DOI: 10.1007/s00103-018-2818-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz        ISSN: 1436-9990            Impact factor:   1.513


  6 in total

1.  Smoking Cessation Attempts and Common Strategies Employed.

Authors:  Daniel Kotz; Anil Batra; Sabrina Kastaun
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Exposure to Sodium Hypochlorite or Cigarette Smoke Induces Lung Injury and Mechanical Impairment in Wistar Rats.

Authors:  Beatriz Mangueira Saraiva-Romanholo; Isabella Santos de Genaro; Francine Maria de Almeida; Soraia Nogueira Felix; Marina Ribeiro Cottes Lopes; Thaís Santos Amorim; Rodolfo Paula Vieira; Fernanda Magalhães Arantes-Costa; Milton Arruda Martins; Iolanda de Fátima Lopes Calvo Tibério; Carla Máximo Prado
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.092

3.  The Health Status and Healthcare Utilization of Ethnic Germans in Russia.

Authors:  Charlotte Arena; Christine Holmberg; Volker Winkler; Philipp Jaehn
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Social inequality and diabetes mellitus - developments over time among the adult population in Germany.

Authors:  Christin Heidemann; Yong Du; Jens Baumert; Rebecca Paprott; Thomas Lampert; Christa Scheidt-Nave
Journal:  J Health Monit       Date:  2019-06-27

5.  Smoking behaviour and passive smoke exposure of adults - Results from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS.

Authors:  Anne Starker; Ronny Kuhnert; Jens Hoebel; Almut Richter
Journal:  J Health Monit       Date:  2022-09-14

6.  Are there social gradients in the occurrence of lung cancer and in the survival of lung cancer patients? Findings from an observational study using German claims data of Lower Saxony.

Authors:  Sebastian Schröder; Johannes Beller; Heiko Golpon; Siegfried Geyer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.