Literature DB >> 30213774

Somatosensory responses to nothing: An MEG study of expectations during omission of tactile stimulations.

Lau M Andersen1, Daniel Lundqvist2.   

Abstract

The brain builds up expectations to future events based on the patterns of past events. This function has been studied extensively in the auditory and visual domains using various oddball paradigms, but only little exploration of this phenomenon has been done in the somatosensory domain. In this study, we explore how expectations of somatosensory stimulations are established and expressed in neural activity as measured with magnetoencephalography. Using tactile stimulations to the index finger, we compared conditions with actual stimulation to conditions with omitted stimulations, both of which were either expected or unexpected. Our results show that when a stimulation is expected but omitted, a time-locked response occurs ∼135 ms subsequent to the expected stimulation. This somatosensory response to "nothing" was source localized to the secondary somatosensory cortex and to the insula. This provides novel evidence of the capability of the brain of millisecond time-keeping of somatosensory patterns across intervals of 3000 ms. Our results also show that when stimuli are repeated and expectations are established, there is associated activity in the theta and beta bands. These theta and beta band expressions of expectation were localized to the primary somatosensory area, inferior parietal cortex and cerebellum. Furthermore, there was gamma band activity in the right insula for the first stimulation after an omission, which indicates the detection of a new stimulation event after an expected pattern has been broken. Finally, our results show that cerebellum play a crucial role in predicting upcoming stimulation and in predicting when stimulation may begin again.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cerebellum; Expectations; Magnetoencephalography; Mismatch responses; Somatosensory processing; Time-keeping

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30213774     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  6 in total

1.  Attention modulates the gating of primary somatosensory oscillations.

Authors:  Alex I Wiesman; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Can EEG and MEG detect signals from the human cerebellum?

Authors:  Lau M Andersen; Karim Jerbi; Sarang S Dalal
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Neural basis of somatosensory target detection independent of uncertainty, relevance, and reports.

Authors:  Pia Schröder; Timo Torsten Schmidt; Felix Blankenburg
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  MEG signatures of long-term effects of agreement and disagreement with the majority.

Authors:  A Gorin; V Klucharev; A Ossadtchi; I Zubarev; V Moiseeva; A Shestakova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Reliability of Upper Limb Pin-Prick Stimulation With Electroencephalography: Evoked Potentials, Spectra and Source Localization.

Authors:  Lisa Tedesco Triccas; Kenneth P Camilleri; Camilleri Tracey; Fahimi Hnazaee Mansoureh; Wittevrongel Benjamin; Muscat Francesca; Boccuni Leonardo; Mantini Dante; Verheyden Geert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.473

6.  Neuronal correlates of the subjective experience of attention.

Authors:  Stephen Whitmarsh; Christophe Gitton; Veikko Jousmäki; Jérôme Sackur; Catherine Tallon-Baudry
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.698

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.