| Literature DB >> 30213088 |
Yazhen Sun1, Chenze Fang2, Jinchang Wang3, Zuoxin Ma4, Youlin Ye5.
Abstract
The three-point bending fatigue tests were carried out in order to accurately predict the fatigue life of an asphalt mixture based on the plateau value (PV) of the dissipated strain energy ratio (DSER). The relations of the dissipated strain energy (DSE) to the stress-strength ratio, temperature and loading rate were studied, and the constructions of the mathematical models of DSE and DSER were completed based on the change laws of the DSE. The relation of the fatigue life to the PV was determined based on the analysis of damage evolution, based on which the fatigue equation was established and used to predict the fatigue life. The results show that the change laws of DSE and DSER can be well described by the proposed mathematical models. The PV is defined as the average value of the DSER in the second stage and the fatigue life decreases in power function with the increase of PV, based on which the fatigue equation of Nf = A(PV)B was established, and the established fatigue equation is very close to that is used in the MEPDG. The fatigue equation can well predict the fatigue life asphalt mixture.Entities:
Keywords: dissipated strain energy; energy-based approach; fatigue life; plateau value of dissipated strain energy ratio; three-point bending fatigue test
Year: 2018 PMID: 30213088 PMCID: PMC6163534 DOI: 10.3390/ma11091696
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Properties of asphalt rubber.
| Properties | Standard | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Penetration (25 °C,100 g, 5 s) | T0604-2011 | 70 (0.1 mm) |
| Softening point | T0606-2011 | 57 (°C) |
| Viscosity (177 °C) | T0625-2011 | 3.8 (Pa·s) |
| Elastic recovery (25 °C) | T0662-2011 | 72 (%) |
Aggregate gradation.
| Sieve Size (mm) | 16.0 | 13.2 | 9.5 | 4.75 | 2.36 | 1.18 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.15 | 0.075 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing percentage | 100.0 | 91.1 | 80.2 | 54.0 | 33.2 | 22.5 | 16.0 | 12.1 | 8.7 | 5.5 |
Fatigue lives.
| Stress-Strength Ratio (SSR)-Temperature-Loading Rate | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 | Average Value | Coefficient of Variation (%) | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.6–25 °C-10 mm/min | 329 | 312 | 298 | 313 | 4.05 | 12.68 |
| 0.7–25 °C-10 mm/min | 168 | 150 | 165 | 161 | 4.89 | 7.87 |
| 0.8–25 °C-10 mm/min | 140 | 128 | 149 | 139 | 6.19 | 8.60 |
| 0.6–15 °C-10 mm/min | 105 | 113 | 109 | 109 | 3.00 | 3.27 |
| 0.6–5 °C-10 mm/min | 91 | 101 | 99 | 97 | 4.45 | 4.32 |
| 0.6–25 °C-20 mm/min | 120 | 119 | 100 | 113 | 8.14 | 9.20 |
Figure 1Stress-strain curve.
Figure 2Change curves of stress and strain verses time.
Figure 3The influence of SSR on dissipated strain energy (DSE).
Figure 4The influence of temperature on DSE.
Figure 5The influence of loading rate on DSE.
Figure 6Fitting effect of DSE-N curve.
Fitting parameters of DSE-N curve.
| SSR-Temperature-Loading Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.6–25 °C-10 mm/min | 0.29359 | 7.7304 × 10−23 | 158.1178 | 10.1179 | 0.9512 |
| 0.7–25 °C-10 mm/min | 0.44862 | 2.0989 × 10−19 | 83.74164 | 9.79295 | 0.9606 |
| 0.8–25 °C-10 mm/min | 0.79304 | 5.6107 × 10−16 | 65.24516 | 8.55627 | 0.9685 |
| 0.6–15 °C-10 mm/min | 1.01016 | 3.1166 × 10−7 | 42.66207 | 3.83088 | 0.9059 |
| 0.6–5 °C-10 mm/min | 0.8327 | 2.6332 × 10−25 | 52.42931 | 14.5094 | 0.9093 |
| 0.6–25 °C-20 mm/min | 0.83581 | 3.9988 × 10−15 | 46.86074 | 8.81419 | 0.9622 |
Figure 7Sensitivity analysis of parameter c2.
Figure 8Sensitivity analysis of parameter c4.
Figure 9Contrast result of dissipated strain energy ratio (DSER).
Figure 10D-N/Nf curve.
Figure 11Scatter plots of DSER-N/Nf.
Statistical Results of Nf and plateau value (PV).
|
| PV |
|---|---|
| 313 | 0.0209 |
| 164 | 0.02484 |
| 129 | 0.02592 |
| 106 | 0.02829 |
| 98 | 0.03065 |
| 92 | 0.0315 |
Fitting Parameters of Fatigue Equation.
| Fitting Parameters |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 8.91785 × 10−4 | −3.29402 | 0.95553 |
Contrast results of fatigue life.
| Stress Strength Ratio-Temperature-Loading Rate | Test Results of | Predictive Results of | Relative Error |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.6–25 °C-10 mm/min | 313 | 305 | 2.5% |
| 0.7–25 °C-10 mm/min | 164 | 172 | 4.9% |
| 0.8–25 °C-10 mm/min | 129 | 150 | 16.3% |
| 0.6–25 °C-20 mm/min | 106 | 112 | 5.7% |
| 0.6–15 °C-10 mm/min | 98 | 79 | 19.4% |
| 0.6–5 °C-10 mm/min | 92 | 76 | 17.4% |