| Literature DB >> 29751515 |
Yazhen Sun1, Chenze Fang2, Jinchang Wang3, Xuezhong Yuan4, Dong Fan5.
Abstract
Laboratory predictions for the fatigue life of an asphalt mixture under cyclic loading based on the plateau value (PV) of the permanent deformation ratio (PDR) were carried out by three-point bending fatigue tests. The influence of test conditions on the recovery ratio of elastic deformation (RRED), the permanent deformation (PD) and PDR, and the trends of RRED, PD, and PDR were studied. The damage variable was defined by using PDR, and the relation of the fatigue life to PDR was determined by analyzing the damage evolution process. The fatigue equation was established based on the PV of PDR and the fatigue life was predicted by analyzing the relation of the fatigue life to the PV. The results show that the RRED decreases with the increase of the number of loading cycles, and the elastic recovery ability of the asphalt mixture gradually decreases. The two mathematical models proposed are based on the change laws of the RRED, and the PD can well describe the change laws. The RRED or the PD cannot well predict the fatigue life because they do not change monotonously with the fatigue life, and one part of the deformation causes the damage and the other part causes the viscoelastic deformation. The fatigue life decreases with the increase of the PDR. The average PDR in the second stage is taken as the PV, and the fatigue life decreases in a power law with the increase of the PV. The average relative error of the fatigue life predicted by the fatigue equation to the test fatigue life is 5.77%. The fatigue equation based on PV can well predict the fatigue life.Entities:
Keywords: asphalt mixture; damage evolution; fatigue equation; fatigue life; plateau value of permanent deformation ratio; road engineering; three-point bending fatigue test
Year: 2018 PMID: 29751515 PMCID: PMC5978099 DOI: 10.3390/ma11050722
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Properties of asphalt rubber.
| Material Property | Used Standard | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Softening point | T0606—2000 | 57 (°C) |
| Viscosity | T0625—2000 | 1.5–4.0 (Pa·s) |
| Elastic recovery | T0662—2000 | 30 (%) |
Aggregate gradation.
| Sieve Size (mm) | 16.0 | 13.2 | 9.5 | 4.75 | 2.36 | 1.18 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.15 | 0.075 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passing percentage | 100.0 | 91.1 | 80.2 | 54.0 | 33.2 | 22.5 | 16.0 | 12.1 | 8.7 | 5.5 |
Figure 1Rut board forming machine.
Figure 2Specimen beams.
Figure 3Fatigue test.
Fatigue lives.
| SSR-Temperature-Loading Rate | Value |
|---|---|
| 0.6–25 °C-10 mm/min | 313 |
| 0.7–25 °C-10 mm/min | 161 |
| 0.8–25 °C-10 mm/min | 139 |
| 0.6–15 °C-10 mm/min | 109 |
| 0.6–5 °C-10 mm/min | 97 |
| 0.6–25 °C-20 mm/min | 113 |
Figure 4Deformation time.
Figure 5RRED-N curve.
Fitting results of RRED mathematical model.
| Fitting Parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Value | 0.25937 | −0.37801 | 0.99456 |
Figure 6Test data and fitting data.
Figure 7RREDs under different test conditions: (a) RREDs at different stress-strength ratios; (b) RREDs at different temperatures; (c) RREDs at different loading rates.
Figure 8PD-N curve.
Fitting results of PD mathematical model.
| Parameter | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter value | 0.85777 | 0.56389 | 0.98372 |
Figure 9PDs under different test conditions: (a) PDs at different stress-strength ratios; (b) PDs at different temperatures; (c) PDs at different loading rates.
Figure 10PDRs under different test conditions: (a) PDRs at different stress-strength ratios; (b) PDRs at different temperatures; (c) PDRs at different loading rates.
Figure 11D-N/Nf curve.
Figure 12PDR-N/Nf scatter plot.
Results of Nf and PV.
| Test Fatigue Life ( | PV |
|---|---|
| 313 | 0.00303819 |
| 161 | 0.007641095 |
| 139 | 0.008407475 |
| 113 | 0.012586557 |
| 109 | 0.014762424 |
| 97 | 0.012631972 |
Figure 13Scatter plots of Nf-PV.
Fitting parameters of fatigue equation.
| Parameter | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter value | 4.24479 | −0.74172 | 0.98653 |
Contrast results of fatigue life.
| SSR-Temperature-Loading Rate | Test Fatigue Life | Predicted Fatigue Life | Relative Error |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.6–25 °C-10mm/min | 313 | 312 | 0.11% |
| 0.7–25 °C-10mm/min | 161 | 158 | 2.02% |
| 0.8–25 °C-10mm/min | 139 | 147 | 5.72% |
| 0.6–25 °C-20mm/min | 113 | 109 | 3.59% |
| 0.6–15 °C-10mm/min | 109 | 97 | 11.20% |
| 0.6–5 °C-10mm/min | 97 | 109 | 12.00% |