Literature DB >> 30211593

How feature relationships influence attention and awareness: Evidence from eye movements and EEG.

Aimee Martin1, Stefanie I Becker1.   

Abstract

Many everyday tasks require selecting relevant objects in the visual field while ignoring irrelevant information. A widely held belief is that attention is tuned to the exact feature value(s) of a sought-after target object (e.g., color, shape). In contrast, subsequent studies have shown that attentional orienting (capture) is often determined by the relative feature(s) that the target has relative to other irrelevant items surrounding (e.g., redder, larger). However, it is unknown whether conscious awareness is also determined by relative features. Alternatively, awareness could be more strongly determined by exact feature values, which seem to determine dwelling on objects. The present study examined eye movements in a color search task with different types of irrelevant distractors to test (a) whether dwelling is more strongly influenced by exact feature matches than relative matches, and (b) which of the processes (capture vs. dwelling) is more important for conscious awareness of the distractor. A second experiment used an electrophysiological marker of attention (N2pc in the electroencephalogram of participants) to test whether the results generalize to covert attention shifts. As expected, the results revealed that the initial capture of attention was strongest for distractors matching the relative color of the target, whereas similarity to the target was the most important determiner for dwelling. Awareness was more strongly determined by the initial capture of attention than dwelling. These results provide important insights into the interplay of attention and awareness and highlight the importance of considering relative, context-dependent features in theories of awareness. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30211593     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

1.  Selection history is relative.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The attentional blink: A relational accountof attentional engagement.

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker; Rheaa T Manoharan; Charles L Folk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-09-28

3.  Attentional Guidance and Match Decisions Rely on Different Template Information During Visual Search.

Authors:  Xinger Yu; Timothy D Hanks; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-12-08

4.  Sliding Scale Theory of Attention and Consciousness/Unconsciousness.

Authors:  Brad Bowins
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10

5.  Eye movements reveal the contributions of early and late processes of enhancement and suppression to the guidance of visual search.

Authors:  Zachary Hamblin-Frohman; Seah Chang; Howard Egeth; Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  Top-down modulation of gaze capture: Feature similarity, optimal tuning, or tuning to relative features?

Authors:  Ashley York; Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.