Literature DB >> 30211316

Diagnostic Efficacy of Serum 1,3-β-D-glucan for Invasive Fungal Infection: An Update Meta-Analysis Based on 37 Case Or Cohort Studies.

Lu Xiaoling1, Tang Tingyu1, Hu Caibao2, Zhao Tian1, Chen Changqin3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of serum 1,3-β-D-gluan as biomarker for invasive fungal infection through meta-analysis.
METHODS: The electronic databases of Medline, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, OVID and CNKI were systematic searched to identified the case-control or Cohort studies relevant to diagnostic efficacy of serum 1,3-β-D-glucan for invasive fungal infection. The data of true positive (tp), false positive (fp), false negative (fn) and true negative (tn) patients number were extracted from each of the original included studies. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and systematic receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were calculated and pooled through random or fixed effect method. The publication bias was evaluated by the Deek's funnel plot.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven relevant studies were fulfilled the inclusion criteria and included in our present meta-analysis. The combined sensitivity, specificity, positive likely hood ratio (+lr), negative likely hood ratio (-lr) and diagnostic odds ratio(dor) for 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infectionwere 0.83 (95%CI:0.38-0.61), 0.81 (95%CI:0.80-0.82), 5.13 (95%CI:3.98-6.62), 0.23 (95%CI:0.18-0.30), and 29.68 (95%CI:18.94-46.52) respectively. The pooled area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.91.The Deek's funnel plot asymmetry test showed there was no publication bias for 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection of the included 37 studies.
CONCLUSION: Serum 1,3-β-D-glucan assay was a promising biomarker for invasive fungal infection diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1,3-β-D-glucan; diagnosis; invasive fungal infection; meta-analysis

Year:  2018        PMID: 30211316      PMCID: PMC6132083          DOI: 10.1515/med-2018-0050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Med (Wars)


Introduction

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are serious kinds of fungal diseases that invade the body, grow and reproduce in body tissues, organs and blood, and cause inflammation and tissue damage [1]. Due to the application of high strength, immunosuppressive agents and high-dose chemotherapy for organ transplantation, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, a variety of catheter in interventional, indwelling intubation ventilator have been widely carried out and the increase of AIDS infection, the incidence of IFI increased significantly [2]. However, the diagnosis of invasive fungal infection was not easy in clinical practice [3]. Generally, invasive fungal infection often requires fungal culture or histopathological examination to confirm the diagnosis. However, fungal culture usually takes 2 to 4 days to obtain results, while histological examination is difficult to achieve in most cases. Therefore, it is important to make a rapid and accurate diagnosis of IFI with a simple and convenient method. 1,3-β-D-glucan is a fungal-cell-wall polysaccharide that can released into the peripheral blood in patients with IFIs. And serum 1,3-β-D-glucan were used as serum biomarker for IFIs diagnosis. However, the diagnostic performance of 1,3-β-D-glucan was quite different according to the previously published studies because of different 1,3-β-D-glucan assays and cutoff value [4]. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis and pooled the diagnostic efficacy to further assess it clinical value.

Methods

Publication search strategy

The electronic databases of Medline, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, OVID and CNKI were systematic searched to identified the case-control or Cohort studies relevant to diagnostic efficacy of serum 1,3-β-D-glucan for invasive fungal infection. The below terms were used for electronic databases searching. (1) invasive fungal infection/IFI; (2) invasive fungal disease/IFD; (3) 1,3-β-D-glucan/BG/BDG. The language was limited to English and Chinese. In order to identify additional relevant publications, the reference of the included studies were also screened to find potential suitable studies. For studies without enough data to make the meta-analysis, the corresponding authors were contacted by e-mail to obtain further information, if necessary.

Data and information extraction

Hu Caibao and Zhao Tian independently read the whole paper and extracted the data and information. Any disagreement was consulted to another investigator (Chen Changqin) for consensus. The extracted data and information included (1) The study type (case-control or Cohort); (2) The language of the publication (English or Chinese); (3) The journal name of the paper published; (4) The year of the paper published; (5) The first and the corresponding authors; (6) The diagnosis of invasive fungal infectionreference standard; (7) The cutoff value of serum 1,3-β-D-glucan in each study; (8) The number of true positive, false positive, false negative and true negative; (9) Invasive fungal infection detection methods; (10) The region the study performed. And the above detail information and data were by Zhao Tian and Chen Changqin respectively and cross checked.

Publication quality evaluation

The general method quality of the included 37 studies was evaluated through the QUADAS tool byTingyu and Hu Caibao independently with eight questionnaires [5, 6]. For each of the question, there was 3 status “yes”, “no” and “unclear”. “yes” represents high quality, “no” represents low quality and “unclear” represents moderate quality.

Statistical analysis

The diagnostic efficacy for 1,3-β-D-glucan for invasive fungal infection was pooled by MetaDiSc 1.4 software by the equation of sensitivity=true positive/(true positive+false negative), specificity=true negative/( true negative+ false positive). Subgroup analysis was performed according to different serum 1,3-β-D-glucan cutoff value. The diagnostic parameters were pooled by mixed or random effect model according to the statistical heterogeneity across theincluded studies. The SROC curve was drawn by Stata12.0SE software and the AUC was calculated through sensitivity vs specificity for 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection. P< 0.05 was considered statistical significant.

Results

Main characteristic of the individual 37 publications

As a result of the related electronic databases systematic searching, finally 37 relevant studies were fulfilled the inclusion criteria and included in our present meta-analysis (Figure 1). Among the 37 publications, 15 studies were Cohort designed prospective study and other 22 are case-control publications. The cutoff value for 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection ranged from 7 (pg/mL) to 140 (pg/mL). The general characteristics of the 37 publications were demonstrated in Table 1.
Figure 1

The flowchart of publication searching and studies inclusion

Table 1

The main characters of the recruited 37 publications

StudyYearCountryStudy typeMethodCutoff value (pg/mL)Referencetpfpfntn
Miyazaki [7]1997JapanCase-controlFungitec G-test10Micobiological culture170736
Obayashi [8]1995JapanCase-controlFungitec G-test20Autopsy3704153
Kawazu [9]2004JapanCohortWako11EORTC/MSG625123
Kondori [10]2004SwedenCase-controlFungitec G-test20Micobiological culture140019
Odabasi [11]2004U.SCohortFungitell80EORTC/MSG18152248
Ostrosky-Zeichner [12]2005U.SCase-controlFungitell60EORTC/MSG952222148
Pazos [13]2005SpainCohortFungitell120EORTC/MSG73126
Pickering [14]2005U.SCase-controlFungitell60Histopathologic examination3110122
Fujita [15]2006JapanCase-controlWako11Micobiological culture72284147
Alam [16]2007KuwaitCase-controlFungitell80EORTC/MSG1401326
Akamatsu [17]2007JapanCohortFungitec G-test40EORTC/MSG12267130
Obayashi [18]2008JapanCase-controlFungitec G-test30Autopsy399298
Senn [19]2008SwitzerlandCohortWako7EORTC/MSG20281085
Persat [20]2008FranceCase-controlFungitell80EORTC/MSG703926123
Ellis [21]2008UAECohortFungitell80EORTC/MSG3623219
Leon [22]2009EuropeCohortFungitell75Histopathologic examination141054117
Lunel [23]2009NetherlandsCohortFungitell60Micobiological culture1612518
Hachem [24]2009U.SCohortFungitell80EORTC/MSG2921618
Koo [25]2009U.SCase-controlFungitell80EORTC/MSG5012423635
Presterl [26]2009AustriaCohortFungitell40Micobiological culture12141144
Racil [27]2010Czech RepublicCase-controlFungitell80EORTC/MSG855127
Alexander [28]2010U.SCohortFungitell60EORTC/MSG85435
Hirata [29]2010JapanCohortWako8.9EORTC/MSG822196
Li J [30]2010ChinaCase-controlFungitec G-test20Micobiological culture3716126
Zuo XH (1)[31]2010ChinaCase-controlFungitec G-test20EORTC/MSG354531
Zuo XH (2) [31]2010ChinaCase-controlFungitec G-test50EORTC/MSG2931132
De Vlieger [32]2011BelgiumCohortFungitell140EORTC/MSG1210233
Posteraro [33]2011ItalyCohortFungitell80EORTC/MSG155174
Acosta [34]2011SpainCohortFungitell80EORTC/MSG77231
Jiang ZM [35]2011ChinaCase-controlFungitec G-test20Micobiological culture4421245
Yang HQ [36]2011ChinaCase-controlFungitec G-test20Micobiological culture423355341027
Jin X [37]2011ChinaCase-controlFungitec G-test10EORTC/MSG401539
Metan [38]2012TurkeryCase-controlFungitell80EORTC/MSG33191759
Liu CH [39]2012ChinaCase-controlFungitec G-test20EORTC/MSG366751
Ding C [40]2012ChinaCase-controlFungitec G-test20Micobiological culture421629
Wang QF [41]2012ChinaCase-controlFungitec G-test20Micobiological culture477275
Yang D [42]2013ChinaCase-controlFungitec G-test20Micobiological culture2616987
Zeng WX [43]2016ChinaCase-controlFungitec G-test20Micobiological culture38339478
The flowchart of publication searching and studies inclusion The main characters of the recruited 37 publications

Quality assessment of the included studies

Eight items (questions) original from QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) were used to assessed the general quality of the included studies. For the QUADAS quality assessment, most of the 37 studies fulfilled the items of “Clear description of study selection criteria “and” acceptable reference standard”. However, most of the included studies didn’t clearly addressed the item of “ withdraw reports”. The generally quality of the included 37 publications were showed in Figure 2.
Figure 2

The general quality of the included 37 studies evaluated by QUADAS

The general quality of the included 37 studies evaluated by QUADAS

The pooled diagnostic sensitivity

The I2 test of the 37-publication indicated significant heterogeneity (I2=83.5%). The diagnostic sensitivity was pooled by random effect model. The combined sensitivity for 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection was 0.83 (95%CI:0.38-0.61), Figure 3.
Figure 3

Pooled forest plot of sensitivity of 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection.

Pooled forest plot of sensitivity of 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection.

The pooled diagnostic specificity

Significant statistical heterogeneity was found in the aspect of pooling the specificity through the I2 test (I2=95.5%). The pooled diagnostic specificity was 0.81 (95%CI:0.80-0.82) by random effect model, Figure 4.
Figure 4

Pooled forest plot of specificity of 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection

Pooled forest plot of specificity of 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection

The pooled +lr and –lr

The statistical heterogeneity for effect size +lr and –lr were evaluated through I2 test. And the results indicated statistical significant heterogeneity (P=0.000). Therefore, the data was pooled through random effect. The pooled +lr and –lr were 5.13 (95%CI:3.98-6.62), Figure 5 and 0.23 (95%CI:0.18-0.30), Figure 6.
Figure 5

Pooled forest plot of +lr for 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection

Figure 6

Pooled forest plot of -lr for 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection

Pooled forest plot of +lr for 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection Pooled forest plot of -lr for 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection

Pooled diagnostic odds ratio(dor)

Because of significant statistical heterogeneity across the included 37 studies (I2=80.9%), the dor was calculated through random effect model. The combined dor was 29.68 (95%CI:18.94-46.52), Figure 7.
Figure 7

Pooled forest plot of dor for 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection

Pooled forest plot of dor for 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection

The pooled summary ROC and AUC

The combined receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated by Stata12.0SE software (Figure 8). The area under the ROC curve was 0.91.
Figure 8

The AUC of the SROC for 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection

The AUC of the SROC for 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection

Diagnostic efficacy changes according to cutoff value

The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, +lr, -lr and odds ratio changes according to cutoff value were demonstrated in Figure 9. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and –lrdid not change a lot for different cutoff value of serum 1,3-β-D-glucan (Figure 9a, Figure 9b, Figure 9d).
Figure 9

The scatter plot of diagnostic efficacy changes according to cutoff value

The scatter plot of diagnostic efficacy changes according to cutoff value However, the +lr and dor changed significantly for different cutoff value especially for <20 (pg/mL) group (Figure 9c and Figure 9e).

Subgroup analysis

In order to minimize the clinical heterogeneity, we performed subgroup analysis according to invasive fungal infection detection method, study type and gold diagnostic reference. However, the diagnostic efficacy didn’t significant changed for different subgroups (Table 2).
Table 2

The subgroup analysis of 1,3-β-D-glucan for invasive fungal infection

SubgroupNo. of studySensitivitySpecificityAUC
Method
Fungitell180.76(0.72-0.79)0.76(0.74-0.78)0.86
Fungitec G-test160.87(0.84-0.89)0.83(0.82-0.85)0.95
Wako30.83(0.76-0.89)0.90(0.88-0.92)0.93
Study type
 Cohort140.75(0.70-0.80)0.79(0.77-0.81)0.85
 Case-control230.84(0.82-0.86)0.82(0.81-0.83)0.93
Reference
 EORTC/MSG210.76(0.73-0.79)0.83(0.81-0.84)0.87
Micobiological culture120.87(0.84-0.89)0.81(0.80-0.83)0.94
Others40.92(0.86-0.96)0.76(0.82-0.80)0.97
The subgroup analysis of 1,3-β-D-glucan for invasive fungal infection

Publication bias evaluation

The publication bias was evaluate by the Deek’s funnel plot (Figure 10) and line regression test. The Deek’s funnel plot asymmetry test showed there was no publication bias for 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection of the included 37 studies.
Figure 10

The funnel plot of publication bias for 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection

The funnel plot of publication bias for 1,3-β-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infection

Discussion

Statistical studies demonstrated that invasive fungal infection(IFI) has significantly increased because of the extensive application of high-dose chemotherapy, glucocorticoids, broad-spectrum antibiotics and immunosuppressive agents, as well as the extensive development of solid organ transplantation and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [44, 45]. Generally, appropriate clinical antifungal treatment is often not timely, which leading to deterioration of the patient’s condition, thereafter resulting in high mortality. Therefore, rapid and accurate diagnosis of IFI is particularly important for patients with IFI. 1,3-β-D-glucan is a polysaccharide component of fungal cell wall, which is fungi specific and can’t find in other microorganisms infection disease such as bacteria, viruses and mycoplasma.1,3-β-D-glucan assay was widely used clinically for IFI diagnosis with good clinical practice value. Previously studies showed 1,3-β-D-glucan was continuously released into the peripheral blood in patients with IFI. Generally, 1,3-β-D-glucan concentration was very low in serum of healthy people, usually less than 10 pg /mL. However, it serum level elevated significant when invasive fungal infection occurred in patients, which was generally greater than 20 pg /mL. Theoretically, 1,3-β-D-glucan detection may be the ideal method for rapid diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in early stage. However, the sensitivity and specificity of these findings are not completely consistent according to the previously published studies. In order to explicated its diagnostic efficacy, we performed this meta-analysis with 37 case-control or cohort studies and pooled the diagnostic efficacy. In our present, meta-analysis, we included 37 relevant studies with the combined sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio(+lr), negative likelyhood ratio(-lr) and diagnostic odds ratio(dor) of 0.83 (95%CI:0.38-0.61), 0.81 (95%CI:0.80-0.82), 5.13 (95%CI:3.98-6.62), 0.23 (95%CI:0.18-0.30), and 29.68 (95%CI:18.94-46.52). And the pooled AUC was 0.91. The results indicated that serum 1,3-β-D-glucan assay was a promising biomarker for invasive fungal infection diagnosis. ROC curve is an accurate and comprehensive method for evaluation diagnostic tests. According to the results of Swets [46], if the area under the ROC curve (AUC) less than 0.5, there is no diagnostic value. The diagnostic value of low with limited clinical value when the AUC between 0.5 ~ 0.7. However, the diagnostic accuracy is high when the AUC is more than 0.7. In this present meta-analysis, we found the pooled AUC was 0.91 which indicated that the diagnostic accuracy is high for serum 1,3-β-D-glucan assay in diagnosis of IFIs. However, there are several limitations in this study. Firstly, there are some clinical heterogeneity which can lead to unstable results. Secondly, statistical heterogeneity was also existed in pooling the data, which may decrease the statistical power. Thirdly, BDG is present in numerous fungi and is therefore non-specific. However, it could probably be a helpful tool for ruling out an IFI.

Conclusion

Serum 1,3-β-D-glucan assay was a promising biomarker for invasive fungal infection diagnosis. However, because of the non-specificity and heterogeneity across the included studies, it should be further evaluated by high quality multicenter prospective diagnostic studies which can provided more strong evidence.
  36 in total

1.  Prospective comparison of the diagnostic potential of real-time PCR, double-sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for galactomannan, and a (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan test in weekly screening for invasive aspergillosis in patients with hematological disorders.

Authors:  Masahito Kawazu; Yoshinobu Kanda; Yasuhito Nannya; Katsunori Aoki; Mineo Kurokawa; Shigeru Chiba; Toru Motokura; Hisamaru Hirai; Seishi Ogawa
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The (1,3){beta}-D-glucan test as an aid to early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections following lung transplantation.

Authors:  Barbara D Alexander; P Brian Smith; R Duane Davis; John R Perfect; L Barth Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Beta-D-glucan detection as a diagnostic test for invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised critically ill patients with symptoms of respiratory infection: an autopsy-based study.

Authors:  Greet De Vlieger; Katrien Lagrou; Johan Maertens; Eric Verbeken; Wouter Meersseman; Eric Van Wijngaerden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Difficulties in using 1,3-{beta}-D-glucan as the screening test for the early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in patients with haematological malignancies--high frequency of false-positive results and their analysis.

Authors:  Zdenek Racil; Iva Kocmanova; Martina Lengerova; Barbora Weinbergerova; Lucie Buresova; Martina Toskova; Jana Winterova; Shira Timilsina; Isa Rodriguez; Jiri Mayer
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 5.  [Invasive fungal infection in immunocompromised patients].

Authors:  Juan Carlos García-Ruiz; Elena Amutio; José Pontón
Journal:  Rev Iberoam Micol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.044

6.  Diagnostic performance of the (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan assay for invasive fungal disease.

Authors:  Sophia Koo; Julie M Bryar; John H Page; Lindsey R Baden; Francisco M Marty
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Usefulness of the "Candida score" for discriminating between Candida colonization and invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Cristóbal León; Sergio Ruiz-Santana; Pedro Saavedra; Beatriz Galván; Armando Blanco; Carmen Castro; Carina Balasini; Aránzazu Utande-Vázquez; Francisco J González de Molina; Miguel A Blasco-Navalproto; Maria J López; Pierre Emmanuel Charles; Estrella Martín; María Adela Hernández-Viera
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Plasma (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan measurement in diagnosis of invasive deep mycosis and fungal febrile episodes.

Authors:  T Obayashi; M Yoshida; T Mori; H Goto; A Yasuoka; H Iwasaki; H Teshima; S Kohno; A Horiuchi; A Ito
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-01-07       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Utility of galactomannan enzyme immunoassay and (1,3) beta-D-glucan in diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: low sensitivity for Aspergillus fumigatus infection in hematologic malignancy patients.

Authors:  R Y Hachem; D P Kontoyiannis; R F Chemaly; Y Jiang; R Reitzel; I Raad
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Risk factors for early invasive fungal disease in critically ill patients.

Authors:  P V Sai Saran; Afzal Azim
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-12
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Specificity Influences in (1→3)-β-d-Glucan-Supported Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Disease.

Authors:  Malcolm A Finkelman
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-29

2.  Role of (1-3)-Β-D-Glucan Test in the Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Infections among High-Risk Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Tanureet Kaur Sandhar; Deepinder Kaur Chhina; Veenu Gupta; Jyoti Chaudhary
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2022-02-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.