Literature DB >> 30211270

Data for serum 1,5 anhydroglucitol concentration in different populations.

Marciane Welter1, Kátia C Boritza1, Mauren I Anghebem-Oliveira2, Railson Henneberg2, Aline B Hauser2, Fabiane G M Rego1,2, Geraldo Picheth1,2.   

Abstract

1,5 anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG), is a nonmetabolized 1-deoxy form of glucose, originate mainly from the diet. 1,5-AG is a biomarker to detect and magnify hyperglycemic excursions (postprandial hyperglycemia) in diabetic patients. Concentrations of 1,5-AG has been applied as supporting biomarker to diagnosis of the major forms of diabetes (type 1, type 2, and gestational). The serum 1,5-AG reference interval is relevant to the appropriate clinical application of this biomarker. This article contains data regards to serum concentration of the biomarker primarily for healthy subjects, capture from the literature, in different populations. Correlation analysis between 1,5-AG and markers associated with diabetes and its complication were presented. The data was complementary to the study "Reference intervals for serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol in children, adolescents, adults, and pregnant women" (Welter et al., 2018). The data present in this article improve the comparisons for 1,5-AG in different conditions and methodologies.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30211270      PMCID: PMC6129696          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.08.165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table Value of the data Data will facilitate the comparison of 1,5-AG in different studies. The data showed the correlation among 1,5-AG and relevant parameters associated with diabetes. The data provide comparison between 1,5-AG reference interval in different ethnicities, ages, gender and methodologies. These data provide information to researchers and clinical laboratory professionals to improve the 1,5-AG diagnostic use.

Data

In this article, we provide complementary data (urea, total protein and lipid profile) of the studied groups (Table 1), correlation analysis (Table 2) and comparisons from the literature for serum 1,5-anhydroglycitol (1,5-AG) concentration, to our study. We proposed a reference interval (Tables 3 and 4) for this biomarker in children, adolescent, adults and pregnant women [2].
Table 1

Complementary laboratory characteristic of studied groups.

ParametersChildren n = 580Adolescents n = 496Adults n = 922Pregnant women n = 305
Sex (M/F)242/338192/304460/462
Urea, mmol/L3.8 (3.1–4.5)3.8 (3.2–4.3)4.3 (3.5–5.3)3.4 (2.8–4.3)
Total Protein, g/L81 (74–89)78 (71–85)71 (67–74)69 (64–74)
Cholesterol, mmol/L4.1 (3.6–4.6)3.9 (3.4–4.4)4.4 (4.0–5.4)5.2 (4.1–6.2)
HDL-c, mmol/L1.4 (1.2–1.6)1.3 (1.0–1.5)1.4 (1.1–1.5)1.2 (1.0–1.6)
LDL-c, mmol/L2.1 (1.7–2.5)2.1 (1.7–2.6)2.5 (2.0–3.1)3.0 (2.5–4.1)
Triglycerides, mmol/L1.1 (0.8–1.5)0.8 (0.6–1.1)1.4 (1.0–2.0)1.3 (1.0–2.0)

Values are median (25–75%; interquartile range); M, male and F, female

HDL-c, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-c, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol

Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; n, sample size.

Table 2

Significative (P < 0.05) Spearman rank order correlation of 1,5 anhydroglucitol with glycemia, HbA1c, age, body mass index (BMI) and creatinine.

GroupsSex1,5-AG correlation (R)
GlycemiaHbA1cAgeBMICreatinine
Children (0–14 y)MaleNSNS0.133NSNS
FemaleNS0.128NSNS0.163
Adolescents (14–18 y)MaleNS0.2210.1530.151NS
FemaleNSNS0.221NSNS
Adults (≥18 y)MaleNSNS−0.144NSNS
FemaleNSNS−0.102NSNS
Combining allNSNS−0.310−0.1870.112
Pregnant womenGestation weeks
n = 110<23 weeksNSNSNSNS
n = 10624–28 weeksNSNSNSNS
n = 5229–32 weeksNSNSNS0.402
n = 37>32NSNSNSNS
Combining pregnant0.095−0.155NSNS

NS, non-significant; –, data no available.

Y, years old.

Table 3

Serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol reference intervals and concentrations in different healthy populations.

1,5-AG, µmol/L
Studies/Methodology
SexMale
Female
SubjectsR.I.nR.I.n
Children and adolescents (5–18 years)(92–298)432(84–278)642Our study [2] Enzymatic colorimetric GlycoMarkTM
US adolescents (12–18 years)(95–178)6(140–172)5[3] Enzymatic colorimetric GlycoMarkTM
[88–212][120–180]
150 ± 31150 ± 15
(95–178)
[102–198]
150 ± 24
US young158 ± 4082143 ± 3754[4] Enzymatic colorimetric GlycoMarkTM
(54–227)
(10–29 years)(63–271)[69–217]
[78–238]
Total (n = 136) 151 ± 39 (54–271); [73–229]
(<18 years)158 ± 35 [88–228]
(>18 years) 137 ± 42 [53–221]
Adults (19–79 years)(80–260)460(62–241)462Our study [2] Enzymatic colorimetric GlycoMarkTM
Finland adults (25–50 years)93 mean2977 mean110[5] Gas chromatography (GC)
81 mean; 10–146 range (n = 139)
US adults (18–39 years)(61–207)224(37–195)224[6] Enzymatic colorimetric GlycoMarkTM
US adults (18–39 years)(52−178)875(50−166)924[7]
Australian adults (40 ± 13 years)125 ± 41 (n = 95)[8] Enzymatic colorimetric GlycoMarkTM
[43–207]
German adults157 ± 44 (n = 116)[9] Liquid chromatography–mass Spectrometric (LC–MS)
[69–245]
Chinese Mauritians144 ± 51 (n = 82)[10] Enzymatic pyranose oxidase
[42–246]
(98–195)
Chinese adults (22–80 years)182 ± 39159 ± 52[11] Enzymatic pyranose oxidase
[104–260][55–263]
92–294 (n = 57)
Chinese adults >20 and <40 years >50 years176 ± 46 [84–268]82116 ± 35 [46–186]185[12] Liquid chromatography negative ion electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS)
166 ± 67 [32–300]9122 ± 41 [40–204]14
Chinese adults(83.1–240.7)[13] Enzymatic
161.9 ± 40.2
[81.5–242.3] (n = 120)
Chinese adults (22–78 years)190 ± 54254160 ± 49322[14] Enzymatic colorimetric GlycoMarkTM
[82–298][62–258]
(69–278)
[67–279]
173 ± 53
Chinese adults (20–79 years)(107–367)226(79–306)232[15] Enzymatic Medical system, Ningbo, China
226.3 ± 60.7175.2 ± 55.8
[104.9–347.7][63.6–286.8]
Japanese (18–81 years)132 ± 36 (n = 45)[16] Gas–liquid chromatography (GLC)
[60–204]
Japanese (mean 47 years)145 ± 44 (n = 229)[17] Gas–liquid chromatography (GLC)
[57–233]
Japanese (27–68 years)(114–215)[18] Gas–liquid chromatography (GLC)
158 ± 38
[82–234]
Japanese adults (23–76 years)159.8 ± 9.8 (n = 20)[19] Enzymatic Nippon–Kayaku
[140–179]
Japanese adults (30–79 years)140 ± 56991122 ± 431104[20] Enzymatic Kyowa Medex Co.
[28–252][36–208]
Japanese adults137.1 ± 8.2181120.6 ± 39203[21] Enzymatic Lana Nippon–Kayaku
[120.7–153.5]231[42.6–198.6]519
(50.5 ± 9.7 y)(54.1 ± 10.3)
124.3 ± 45.1115.1 ± 40.2
[34.1–214.5][34.7–195.5]
(74.5 ± 5.8 y)(75.3 ± 6.7 y)

US, Americans from United States; UK, English; n, sample size.

Values were reference interval (2.5th–97.5th); [95% calculated as mean±2–SD]; mean±SD or median (IQR, interquartile range, 25–75%).

Table 4

Serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol reference intervals and concentrations in pregnancy in different populations.

Pregnant1,5-AG, μmol/L R.I.nStudies/Methodology
Pregnant Women <23 weeks of gestation(56–298)110Our study [2] Enzymatic colorimetric GlycoMarkTM
Pregnant Women >24 weeks of gestation(33–181)195Our study [2] Enzymatic colorimetric GlycoMarkTM
Japanese healthy non-pregnant women113 ± 3225[22] Gas-liquid chromatography (GLC)
[49–197]
Japan pregnant women at 36 weeks gestation62 ± 28543
[6–118]
Japan women on 5th day of puerperium66 ± 23543
[20–112]
Japan women on 30th day of puerperium87 ± 21543
[45–129]
Japan pregnant Women at >24 weeks of gestation128 (IQR 102–160)
UK Normoglycemic women with glycosuric pregnancy (~31 weeks)4616[23] High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
(IQR 30–56)
UK Normoglycemic women without glucosuric pregnancy (~31 weeks)7216
(IQR 55–79)
UK Normoglycemic women (~31 weeks)55 (IQR 31–72)32
Chinese pregnant women (16–45 years) at 26–28 weeks of gestation133.0 ± 52.944[24] Enzymatic pyranose oxidase
[27.2–238.8]

US, Americans from United States; UK, English; n, sample size.

Values were reference interval (2.5th–97.5th); [95% calculated as mean±2−SD]; mean±SD or median (IQR, interquartile range, 25–75%).

Complementary laboratory characteristic of studied groups. Values are median (25–75%; interquartile range); M, male and F, female HDL-c, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-c, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol Abbreviations: BMI, Body mass index; n, sample size. Significative (P < 0.05) Spearman rank order correlation of 1,5 anhydroglucitol with glycemia, HbA1c, age, body mass index (BMI) and creatinine. NS, non-significant; –, data no available. Y, years old. Serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol reference intervals and concentrations in different healthy populations. US, Americans from United States; UK, English; n, sample size. Values were reference interval (2.5th–97.5th); [95% calculated as mean±2–SD]; mean±SD or median (IQR, interquartile range, 25–75%). Serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol reference intervals and concentrations in pregnancy in different populations. US, Americans from United States; UK, English; n, sample size. Values were reference interval (2.5th–97.5th); [95% calculated as mean±2−SD]; mean±SD or median (IQR, interquartile range, 25–75%). We studied healthy Euro-Brazilian subjects, classified as children (0–14 years old), adolescent (>14 and <18 years old) and adults (≥18 years old). Additionally, we analyzed pregnant women in four gestational periods, <23 weeks; 24–28 weeks, 29–32 weeks and >32 weeks of gestation. 1,5-AG was measure by enzymatic colorimetric method (GlycomarkTM; Tomen America, New York, NY, USA) in automated system Labmax 400 analyzer (Labtest Diagnostic). The laboratory parameters, markers for kidney function (urea), nourishment (total protein) and lipid profile were compatible with healthy subjects (Table 1). The correlation in healthy subjects between 1,5-AG and glycemia, HbA1c, age, BMI and creatinine were weak or none (Table 2).

Experimental design, materials and methods

Study population

The population comprises 2303 unrelated Euro-Brazilian healthy subjects from Curitiba, State of Parana, South of Brazil [1]. All samples were obtained with the approval of the Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Parana. Adult samples (n = 922) were collected from blood bank donors. Children (n = 580) and adolescent samples (n = 496) were obtained from Public Schools. Healthy pregnant women (n = 305) samples were obtained from the Curitiba Government Laboratory. The normoglycemic criteria applied for selected subjects in the study were fasting glycemia <5.5 mmol/L with an HbA1c range of 20.2–36.6 mmol/mol (4.0–5.7%) for children, adolescents, and adults. For pregnant women a fasting blood glucose <5.1 mmol/L was applied to exclude gestational diabetes. All subjects declared that were not using any medications or drugs.

Samples

Samples were serum obtained in non-fasting state for adults, children and adolescents, and fasting for those who were pregnant. Blood were collected in BD vacutainers SST II advance vacutainer with silica clot activator/gel (Becton Dickinson Co.). Bloods were separated in less than two hours from venipuncture and the serum stored in an ultrafreezer (−80 °C).

Analytical methods

Concentrations of 1,5-AG were measured enzymatically with the Glycomark reagent (GlycoMark, Tomen America, New York, NY Inc.) in an automated system (Labmax 400 analyzer; Labtest. Diagnostics). The reaction details and methodology performance were described in Nowatzkea et al. [6].

Clinical and laboratory parameters

Clinical data acquisition and analytical procedures, for laboratory data, have been reported previously [2].

Data analysis

Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis and reference intervals were calculated with MedCalc MedCalc version 17.6 (MedCalc Statistical Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium). Probability values (p-values) less than 5% (p < 0.05) were considered significant for all tests.
Subject areaClinical laboratory
More specific subject areaBiomarkers for clinical chemistry associated with diabetes
Type of dataTables
How data was acquiredCapture from literature data for 1,5-AG concentration and methodology. Comparison reference interval data was obtained with enzymatic colorimetric assay (Glycomark) measured in automate system (LabMax 400, Labtest, Brazil)
Data formatAnalyzed
Experimental factorsBlood samples (serum or plasma EDTA) measured with different methodologies
Experimental featuresCompilation, calculations, analysis (descriptive statistics) and comparison of literature data
Data source locationFederal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil.
Data accessibilityData is in published papers and in this article.
Related research articleM. Welter, K.C. Boritza, M.I. Anghebem-Oliveira, R. Henneberg, A.B. Hauser, F.G.M. Rego, G. Picheth, Reference intervals for serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol in children, adolescents, adults, and pregnant women, CCA (2018) [1].
  23 in total

1.  Serum 1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol as a new clinical marker for glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetics.

Authors:  H Shi; J Fang; X Yang; Z Shen; X Zhu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Effects of sex and age on serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol in nondiabetic subjects.

Authors:  M Ouchi; K Oba; H Yamashita; M Okazaki; M Tsunoda; M Ohara; K Sekimizu; K Watanabe; T Suzuki; H Nakano
Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.949

3.  The establishment of biological reference intervals of nontraditional glycemic markers in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Qiang Zhou; De-Bao Shi; Li-Ying Lv
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  The predictive value of serum 1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol in pregnancies at increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational impaired glucose tolerance.

Authors:  W H Tam; M S Rogers; T K Lau; M Arumanayagam
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Reduction of plasma 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1-deoxyglucose) concentration in diabetic patients.

Authors:  T Yamanouchi; H Akanuma; T Nakamura; I Akaoka; Y Akanuma
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Plasma 1,5 anhydroglucitol levels, a measure of short-term glycaemia: assay assessment and lower levels in diabetic vs. non-diabetic subjects.

Authors:  Andrzej S Januszewski; Connie Karschimkus; Kathryn E R Davis; David O'Neal; Glenn Ward; Alicia J Jenkins
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 5.602

7.  Serum levels of 1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol during the normal and diabetic pregnancy and puerperium.

Authors:  M Tetsuo; T Hamada; K Yoshimatsu; J Ishimatsu; T Matsunaga
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Quantification of serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol in uremic and diabetic patients by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.

Authors:  T Niwa; L Dewald; J Sone; T Miyazaki; M Kajita
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Serum 1,5-anhydroglucitol (Glycomark) levels in children with and without type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Thanh M Nguyen; Luisa M Rodriguez; Kimberly J Mason; Rubina A Heptulla
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.866

10.  Origin and disposal of 1,5-anhydroglucitol, a major polyol in the human body.

Authors:  T Yamanouchi; Y Tachibana; H Akanuma; S Minoda; T Shinohara; H Moromizato; H Miyashita; I Akaoka
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1992-08
View more
  5 in total

1.  Clinical and metabolomics analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Hongping Xia; Jianxiang Chen; Karthik Sekar; Ming Shi; Tian Xie; Kam M Hui
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 4.290

2.  A glucose-like metabolite deficient in diabetes inhibits cellular entry of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Liangqin Tong; Xiaoping Xiao; Min Li; Shisong Fang; Enhao Ma; Xi Yu; Yibin Zhu; Chunli Wu; Deyu Tian; Fan Yang; Jing Sun; Jing Qu; Nianzhen Zheng; Shumin Liao; Wanbo Tai; Shengyong Feng; Liming Zhang; Yuhan Li; Lin Wang; Xuelian Han; Shihui Sun; Long Yang; Hui Zhong; Jincun Zhao; Wenjun Liu; Xiaohui Liu; Penghua Wang; Liang Li; Guangyu Zhao; Renli Zhang; Gong Cheng
Journal:  Nat Metab       Date:  2022-05-09

Review 3.  Review of methods for detecting glycemic disorders.

Authors:  Michael Bergman; Muhammad Abdul-Ghani; Ralph A DeFronzo; Melania Manco; Giorgio Sesti; Teresa Vanessa Fiorentino; Antonio Ceriello; Mary Rhee; Lawrence S Phillips; Stephanie Chung; Celeste Cravalho; Ram Jagannathan; Louis Monnier; Claude Colette; David Owens; Cristina Bianchi; Stefano Del Prato; Mariana P Monteiro; João Sérgio Neves; Jose Luiz Medina; Maria Paula Macedo; Rogério Tavares Ribeiro; João Filipe Raposo; Brenda Dorcely; Nouran Ibrahim; Martin Buysschaert
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.602

4.  Immunological evidence for in vivo production of novel advanced glycation end-products from 1,5-anhydro-D-fructose, a glycogen metabolite.

Authors:  Akiko Sakasai-Sakai; Takanobu Takata; Hirokazu Suzuki; Ikuro Maruyama; Yoshihiro Motomiya; Masayoshi Takeuchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Hypothesis: A Novel Neuroprotective Role for Glucose-6-phosphatase (G6PC3) in Brain-To Maintain Energy-Dependent Functions Including Cognitive Processes.

Authors:  Gerald A Dienel
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.