| Literature DB >> 30211229 |
Lili Niu1, KeYu Shi1, Jing-Jing Xie1, Sen Liu1, Tao Zhong1.
Abstract
The recent geographic expansion of wild boars and the even more recent development of numerous domestic pigs have spurred exploration on pig domestic origins. The porcine KIT gene has been showed to affect pleiotropic effects, blood parameters, and coat colour phenotypes, especially the white colour phenotype formation in European commercial breeds. Here, we described the use of SNPs to identify different selection patterns on the porcine KIT gene and the phylogenetic relationships of the inferred haplotypes. The phylogenetic tree revealed four clades in European and Asian wild and domestic pigs: two major clades with European and Asian origins and one minor clade with Iberian origins as well as the other minor clade in Asia, consistent with the major introgression of domestic Asian pigs in Europe around 18th -19th century. The domestication history of pigs, which occurred in the domestication centers (Europe and Asia), has also been demonstrated by mtDNA analysis. Furthermore, both Asian and European domestic pigs evolved under purifying selection. This study indicated that domestic pigs in Europe and Asia have different lineage origins but the porcine KIT gene was undergoing a purifying selection during their evolutional histories.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30211229 PMCID: PMC6120332 DOI: 10.1155/2018/8932945
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Primer sets used in this study.
| Primer Name | Sequence (5'-3') | Product size (bp) | TM (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIT_E1F | GGAACGTGGAAAGGAGCT | 205 | 66 |
| KIT_E1R | CAGCCACCTCTTCTGACAC | ||
| KIT_E2F | ACCCTTGCACCATAAATAGC | 498 | 59 |
| KIT_E2R | GACTCAGCCATCTATATGTC | ||
| KIT_E3F | TCAGATTCGTTAACCACTGC | 447 | 64 |
| KIT_E3R | TGGCATATCCGCTGATCTA | ||
| KIT_E4F | CGAAAGGCCATACAGTGAG | 362 | 50 |
| KIT_E4R | TGTATGAAAGCAACTATACC | ||
| KIT_E5F | TCCCCCCGGGACTGCAGAGATTTGGGAATTATG | 548 | 59 |
| KIT_E5R | CGCGGATCCTCAACCTACTACTTCTAAGGTGG | ||
| KIT_E6F | GAAGACATAAGATGGTGATA | 385 | 53 |
| KIT_E6R | CTAATATCCATGAGGACGCAGG | ||
| KIT_E7F | CCAAAGCAGGCGTGTATTT | 344 | 55 |
| KIT_E7R | GGTCAAAATTATCATGAAGCAG | ||
| KIT_E8F | GTCATCTTCAGCCTCAAGAAAG | 313 | 54 |
| KIT_E8R | TCTGAAAACATATTTGAAATTC | ||
| KIT_E9F | GGCAAATAATTTTTCTTCTAG | 293 | 54 |
| KIT_E9R | CAGGCAGAGCCTAAACATCC | ||
| KIT_E10-11F | CTTGACTCCTGCCATGATG | 536 | 64 |
| KIT_E10-11R | CTAGAACAAAGGAAGCTACCG | ||
| KIT_E12-13F | GTCCCTGATTCCTTTATTGG | 486 | 60 |
| KIT_E12-13R | GCTTATCATCAAGGATGGTC | ||
| KIT_E14F | GCATGTGAATGGCCGTGATC | 322 | 50 |
| KIT_E14R | ATCAGCCTTGATTGCAAACC | ||
| KIT_E15-16F | CAAAGTCAGCCTCTTATGTGA | 910 | 52 |
| KIT_E15-16R | CTACGGCTCTAAAATGCTCC | ||
| KIT_E17F | TGGCACCATATAACATAGGC | 325 | 60 |
| KIT_E17R | GGTGTGCATTATGAAACTCAC | ||
| KIT_E18-19F | GCAGCAGGAGCAGTATCTAC | 482 | 63 |
| KIT_E18-19R | AACCTTCAACATCTGGGTTC | ||
| KIT_E20F | GGTGTACACCCAAAGACAG | 217 | 63 |
| KIT_E20R | CTGTTCAAGGCGTTCCAAGC | ||
| KIT_E21F | ACTTGCGATTCTGGACCTGC | 271 | 63 |
| KIT_E21R | GAATGGCAGTAGGTCGGTGC |
Diversity and neutrality indices of KIT gene in the tested pigs.
| Subgroups | No. of | No. of haplotypes |
|
| Tajima's | Fu and Li's | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ns | s | D | D | F | |||||
| G1 | AWB-ADP | 3 | 14 | 24 | 1.68 | 1.56 | 0.28 | -0.08 | 0.03 |
| G2 | EWB-EDP | 3 | 8 | 7 | 1.63 | 1.54 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.17 |
| G3 | AWB-ADPEDP | 3 | 12 | 9 | 2.21 | 1.89 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.89 |
| G4 | East EWB-Iberian | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0.91 | 0.94 | -0.21 | -0.21 | -0.20 |
Subgroups were identified by network analysis. ns: nsSNP (nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphism), s: sSNP (synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism), π: nucleotide diversity, and θ: Watterson's theta estimator; # per kilobase between sequences, within subgroup, wild boars' haplotypes found in domestic pigs and domestic pigs' haplotypes found in wild boars were excluded from neutrality analysis.
Figure 1Pairwise synonymous (dS) and nonsynonymous (dN) substitutions of the KIT gene among wild and domestic pigs.
Figure 2A consensus tree reconstructed for the investigated pigs using coding sequence of the KIT gene (a) and D-loop sequence (b).
Figure 3A parsimony median-joining network for the investigated pigs based on the KIT gene (a) and D-loop sequences (b).