Importance: Recanalization of intracranial thrombus is associated with improved clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The association of intravenous alteplase treatment and thrombus characteristics with recanalization over time is important for stroke triage and future trial design. Objective: To examine recanalization over time across a range of intracranial thrombus occlusion sites and clinical and imaging characteristics in patients with ischemic stroke treated with intravenous alteplase or not treated with alteplase. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter prospective cohort study of 575 patients from 12 centers (in Canada, Spain, South Korea, the Czech Republic, and Turkey) with acute ischemic stroke and intracranial arterial occlusion demonstrated on computed tomographic angiography (CTA). Exposures: Demographics, clinical characteristics, time from alteplase to recanalization, and intracranial thrombus characteristics (location and permeability) defined on CTA. Main Outcomes and Measures: Recanalization on repeat CTA or on first angiographic acquisition of affected intracranial circulation obtained within 6 hours of baseline CTA, defined using the revised arterial occlusion scale (rAOL) (scores from 0 [primary occlusive lesion remains the same] to 3 [complete revascularization of primary occlusion]). Results: Among 575 patients (median age, 72 years [IQR, 63-80]; 51.5% men; median time from patient last known well to baseline CTA of 114 minutes [IQR, 74-180]), 275 patients (47.8%) received intravenous alteplase only, 195 (33.9%) received intravenous alteplase plus endovascular thrombectomy, 48 (8.3%) received endovascular thrombectomy alone, and 57 (9.9%) received conservative treatment. Median time from baseline CTA to recanalization assessment was 158 minutes (IQR, 79-268); median time from intravenous alteplase start to recanalization assessment was 132.5 minutes (IQR, 62-238). Successful recanalization occurred at an unadjusted rate of 27.3% (157/575) overall, including in 30.4% (143/470) of patients who received intravenous alteplase and 13.3% (14/105) who did not (difference, 17.1% [95% CI, 10.2%-25.8%]). Among patients receiving alteplase, the following factors were associated with recanalization: time from treatment start to recanalization assessment (OR, 1.28 for every 30-minute increase in time [95% CI, 1.18-1.38]), more distal thrombus location, eg, distal M1 middle cerebral artery (39/84 [46.4%]) vs internal carotid artery (10/92 [10.9%]) (OR, 5.61 [95% CI, 2.38-13.26]), and higher residual flow (thrombus permeability) grade, eg, hairline streak (30/45 [66.7%]) vs none (91/377 [24.1%]) (OR, 7.03 [95% CI, 3.32-14.87]). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with acute ischemic stroke, more distal thrombus location, greater thrombus permeability, and longer time to recanalization assessment were associated with recanalization of arterial occlusion after administration of intravenous alteplase; among patients who did not receive alteplase, rates of arterial recanalization were low. These findings may help inform treatment and triage decisions in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Importance: Recanalization of intracranial thrombus is associated with improved clinical outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The association of intravenous alteplase treatment and thrombus characteristics with recanalization over time is important for stroke triage and future trial design. Objective: To examine recanalization over time across a range of intracranial thrombus occlusion sites and clinical and imaging characteristics in patients with ischemic stroke treated with intravenous alteplase or not treated with alteplase. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter prospective cohort study of 575 patients from 12 centers (in Canada, Spain, South Korea, the Czech Republic, and Turkey) with acute ischemic stroke and intracranial arterial occlusion demonstrated on computed tomographic angiography (CTA). Exposures: Demographics, clinical characteristics, time from alteplase to recanalization, and intracranial thrombus characteristics (location and permeability) defined on CTA. Main Outcomes and Measures: Recanalization on repeat CTA or on first angiographic acquisition of affected intracranial circulation obtained within 6 hours of baseline CTA, defined using the revised arterial occlusion scale (rAOL) (scores from 0 [primary occlusive lesion remains the same] to 3 [complete revascularization of primary occlusion]). Results: Among 575 patients (median age, 72 years [IQR, 63-80]; 51.5% men; median time from patient last known well to baseline CTA of 114 minutes [IQR, 74-180]), 275 patients (47.8%) received intravenous alteplase only, 195 (33.9%) received intravenous alteplase plus endovascular thrombectomy, 48 (8.3%) received endovascular thrombectomy alone, and 57 (9.9%) received conservative treatment. Median time from baseline CTA to recanalization assessment was 158 minutes (IQR, 79-268); median time from intravenous alteplase start to recanalization assessment was 132.5 minutes (IQR, 62-238). Successful recanalization occurred at an unadjusted rate of 27.3% (157/575) overall, including in 30.4% (143/470) of patients who received intravenous alteplase and 13.3% (14/105) who did not (difference, 17.1% [95% CI, 10.2%-25.8%]). Among patients receiving alteplase, the following factors were associated with recanalization: time from treatment start to recanalization assessment (OR, 1.28 for every 30-minute increase in time [95% CI, 1.18-1.38]), more distal thrombus location, eg, distal M1 middle cerebral artery (39/84 [46.4%]) vs internal carotid artery (10/92 [10.9%]) (OR, 5.61 [95% CI, 2.38-13.26]), and higher residual flow (thrombus permeability) grade, eg, hairline streak (30/45 [66.7%]) vs none (91/377 [24.1%]) (OR, 7.03 [95% CI, 3.32-14.87]). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with acute ischemic stroke, more distal thrombus location, greater thrombus permeability, and longer time to recanalization assessment were associated with recanalization of arterial occlusion after administration of intravenous alteplase; among patients who did not receive alteplase, rates of arterial recanalization were low. These findings may help inform treatment and triage decisions in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Authors: A Zangerle; S Kiechl; M Spiegel; M Furtner; M Knoflach; P Werner; A Mair; G Wille; C Schmidauer; K Gautsch; T Gotwald; S Felber; W Poewe; J Willeit Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-01-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Mònica Millán; Sebastià Remollo; Helena Quesada; Arturo Renú; Alejandro Tomasello; Priyanka Minhas; Natalia Pérez de la Ossa; Marta Rubiera; Laura Llull; Pedro Cardona; Fahad Al-Ajlan; María Hernández; Zarina Assis; Andrew M Demchuk; Tudor Jovin; Antoni Dávalos Journal: Stroke Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Bijoy K Menon; Christopher D d'Esterre; Emmad M Qazi; Mohammed Almekhlafi; Leszek Hahn; Andrew M Demchuk; Mayank Goyal Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Mayank Goyal; Bijoy K Menon; Wim H van Zwam; Diederik W J Dippel; Peter J Mitchell; Andrew M Demchuk; Antoni Dávalos; Charles B L M Majoie; Aad van der Lugt; Maria A de Miquel; Geoffrey A Donnan; Yvo B W E M Roos; Alain Bonafe; Reza Jahan; Hans-Christoph Diener; Lucie A van den Berg; Elad I Levy; Olvert A Berkhemer; Vitor M Pereira; Jeremy Rempel; Mònica Millán; Stephen M Davis; Daniel Roy; John Thornton; Luis San Román; Marc Ribó; Debbie Beumer; Bruce Stouch; Scott Brown; Bruce C V Campbell; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Jeffrey L Saver; Michael D Hill; Tudor G Jovin Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Mayank Goyal; Bijoy K Menon; Timo Krings; Shivanand Patil; Emmad Qazi; Ryan A McTaggart; Mohammed A Almekhlafi; Reza Jehan; Jeffrey Saver; Mahesh V Jayaraman Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: Marc Ribo; José Alvarez-Sabín; Joan Montaner; Francisco Romero; Pilar Delgado; Marta Rubiera; Raquel Delgado-Mederos; Carlos A Molina Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-03-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Peter J Mitchell; Leonid Churilov; Nawaf Yassi; Timothy J Kleinig; Richard J Dowling; Bernard Yan; Steven J Bush; Helen M Dewey; Vincent Thijs; Rebecca Scroop; Marion Simpson; Mark Brooks; Hamed Asadi; Teddy Y Wu; Darshan G Shah; Tissa Wijeratne; Timothy Ang; Ferdinand Miteff; Christopher R Levi; Edrich Rodrigues; Henry Zhao; Patrick Salvaris; Carlos Garcia-Esperon; Peter Bailey; Henry Rice; Laetitia de Villiers; Helen Brown; Kendal Redmond; David Leggett; John N Fink; Wayne Collecutt; Andrew A Wong; Claire Muller; Alan Coulthard; Ken Mitchell; John Clouston; Kate Mahady; Deborah Field; Henry Ma; Thanh G Phan; Winston Chong; Ronil V Chandra; Lee-Anne Slater; Martin Krause; Timothy J Harrington; Kenneth C Faulder; Brendan S Steinfort; Christopher F Bladin; Gagan Sharma; Patricia M Desmond; Mark W Parsons; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John Charles Benson; Sean T Fitzgerald; Ramanathan Kadirvel; Collin Johnson; Daying Dai; Doyle Karen; David F Kallmes; Waleed Brinjikji Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2019-06-25 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: W Qiu; H Kuang; J Nair; Z Assis; M Najm; C McDougall; B McDougall; K Chung; A T Wilson; M Goyal; M D Hill; A M Demchuk; B K Menon Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: M Almekhlafi; J M Ospel; G Saposnik; N Kashani; A Demchuk; M D Hill; M Goyal; B K Menon Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-01-30 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: V Yogendrakumar; F Al-Ajlan; M Najm; J Puig; A Calleja; S-I Sohn; S H Ahn; R Mikulik; N Asdaghi; T S Field; A Jin; T Asil; J-M Boulanger; M D Hill; A M Demchuk; B K Menon; D Dowlatshahi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: M A Almekhlafi; W G Kunz; B K Menon; R A McTaggart; M V Jayaraman; B W Baxter; D Heck; D Frei; C P Derdeyn; T Takagi; A H Aamodt; I M R Fragata; M D Hill; A M Demchuk; M Goyal Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: J M Ospel; N Kashani; U Fischer; B K Menon; M Almekhlafi; A T Wilson; M M Foss; G Saposnik; M Goyal; M D Hill Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Henrik Gensicke; James W Evans; Fahad S Al Ajlan; Dar Dowlatshahi; Mohamed Najm; Ana L Calleja; Josep Puig; Sung-lI Sohn; Seong H Ahn; Alexandre Y Poppe; Robert Mikulik; Negar Asdaghi; Thalia S Field; Albert Jin; Talip Asil; Jean-Martin Boulanger; Michael D Hill; Mayank Goyal; Andrew M Demchuk; Bijoy K Menon Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Johanna Maria Ospel; Ryan McTaggart; Nima Kashani; Marios Psychogios; Mohammed Almekhlafi; Mayank Goyal Journal: Semin Intervent Radiol Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 1.513
Authors: Sebastian P Pernal; Alexander J Willis; Michael E Sabo; Laura M Moore; Steven T Olson; Sean C Morris; Francis M Creighton; Herbert H Engelhard Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2020-03-09