Literature DB >> 30206218

Reviving the Weizmann process for commercial n-butanol production.

Ngoc-Phuong-Thao Nguyen1,2,3,4, Céline Raynaud5, Isabelle Meynial-Salles1,2,3, Philippe Soucaille6,7,8,9,10.   

Abstract

Developing a commercial process for the biological production of n-butanol is challenging as it needs to combine high titer, yield, and productivities. Here we engineer Clostridium acetobutylicum to stably and continuously produce n-butanol on a mineral media with glucose as sole carbon source. We further design a continuous process for fermentation of high concentration glucose syrup using in situ extraction of alcohols by distillation under low pressure and high cell density cultures to increase the titer, yield, and productivity of n-butanol production to the level of 550 g/L, 0.35 g/g, and 14 g/L/hr, respectively. This process provides a mean to produce n-butanol at performance levels comparable to that of corn wet milling ethanol plants using yeast as a biocatalyst. It may hold the potential to be scaled-up at pilot and industrial levels for the commercial production of n-butanol.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30206218      PMCID: PMC6134114          DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05661-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


Introduction

The Weizmann process was developed at the beginning of the 20th century for the biological conversion of corn into acetone and n-butanol by Clostridium acetobutylicum[1-3]. It was the second largest fermentation process (after ethanol) of enormous industrial, social and historical importance[1-3]. Beyond its use during the First World War to produce acetone for smokeless gunpowder (cordite) manufacturing, it became a process used worldwide to produce these two industrial solvents from a variety of renewable substrates[3-5]. Its demise in the early 1960s was the result of the superior petrochemical-process economics due to drastic increase of the substrate costs[1], the low yield, titer, and productivity of the fermentation[6] (resulting in high operating and capital expenses), and the inability to use continuous process technologies (as in the case of petrochemical processes) due to the loss of C. acetobutylicum’s capacity to produce solvents because of degeneration[7,8]. Here we first use an advanced metabolic engineering approach to engineer C. acetobutylicum to stably and continuously produce n-butanol from glucose[9]. We further design a continuous process for the fermentation of high concentration glucose syrup using (i) in situ extraction of alcohols by distillation under low pressure, and (ii) high cell density cultures to increase both the titer, yield, and productivity of n-butanol production.

Results

Engineering C. acetobutylicum for the production of n-butanol

This step requires to first eliminate the production of undesired by-products namely butyrate, acetone, and lactate (Fig. 1a). In the CAB1057 strain, we have then deleted ptb and buk that code for the phosphotransbutyrylase and the butyrate kinase involved in the last two steps of butyrate formation[10-12], ctfAB that code for the acetoacetyl-CoA-acetate CoA-transferase involved in the first specific step of acetone formation[13] and ldhA that codes for the lactate dehydrogenase involved in the last step of L-lactate formation[13]. When CAB1057 was evaluated in chemostat culture and subjected to a metabolic flux analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1), the expected phenotype was obtained for the deleted pathways but the n-butanol yield (Fig. 2a) and fluxes (Supplementary Fig. 1) were not improved as this mutant produces more acetate and ethanol than the wild-type strain. The redox-sensing transcriptional repressor (Rex) has been found to modulate its DNA-binding activity in response to the NADH/NAD+ ratio and to repress the expression of several operons including thlA (that codes for a thiolase), crt-bcd-etfAB-hbd, (that code, respectively, for a crotonase, a butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase, and a 3-hydroxy-butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase) and adhE2 (that codes for a bifunctional aldehyde-alcohol[14,15] (Fig. 1b)). As thlA and crt-bcd-etfAB-hbd code for the enzymes converting acetyl-CoA to butyryl-CoA and adhE2 codes for the enzyme that reduces butyryl-CoA and acetyl-CoA to n-butanol and ethanol, respectively, the rexA gene, encoding Rex, was deleted in CAB1057 (to yield CAB1058) with the objective of improving the C4/C2 ratio and the flux of alcohol formation. The yield and flux of alcohol formation by CAB1058 were significantly improved, associated with a four-fold decrease of the hydrogen yield and fluxes as the electrons from reduced ferredoxin were mainly used for NADH formation (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. 1). However, the higher alcohol yield was only due to an increase in the ethanol flux as the n-butanol yield remained almost unchanged and, consequently, the C4/C2 ratio was not improved (Fig. 2b). When the thiolase (catalyzed by ThlA) and 3-hydroxy-butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase (catalyzed by Hbd) activities were measured in CAB1057 and CAB1058, ThlA remained unchanged while Hbd was 1.5 fold higher), indicating that the rexA deletion has the expected effect on the expression of the crt-bcd-etfAB-hbd operon coding for the enzymes that convert acetoacetyl-CoA to butyryl-CoA) but not on thlA. ThlA is one of the most abundant intracellular protein[16] representing more than 5% of the cytosolic proteins. Furthermore, the condensation reaction by ThlA was shown to be very sensitive to CoA-SH, with micro molar levels totally inhibiting the enzyme[17] and it was also found to be regulated by a redox-switch through a reversible disulfide bond that is formed between two catalytic cysteine residues (Cys88 and Cys378)[18]. As it might be difficult to further overexpress ThlA and as its biochemical properties might also contribute to the low C4/C2 ratio in CAB1058 (Fig. 2b), ThlA was replaced by AtoB, a thiolase from E. coli that has a higher catalytic efficiency, is less sensitive to CoA-SH[17,19,20] and not subject to a redox-switch. For this purpose, a synthetic atoB gene was designed, codon harmonized[21,22] for C. acetobutylicum, and used to replace in frame thlA in CAB1058 (to yield CAB1059). In CAB1059, the butanol to ethanol ratio (mol/mol) and the butanol flux (in % of the glucose flux) only increased from 0.59 to 0.84 (Fig. 2b) and from 45 to 55.1, respectively, while the thiolase activity increased 1.7 fold (Supplementary Fig. 2) suggesting that the C4/C2 ratio is not controlled by the thiolase level or by the levels of the other enzymes of the pathway and might be thermodynamically controlled. The condensation of two acetyl-CoA to acetoacetyl-CoA catalyzed by the thiolase is thermodynamically unfavorable[23]. Therefore, it is important that acetoacetyl-CoA is efficiently reduced by Hbd (Fig. 1b) to pull the reaction[23]. Hbd is an NADH-dependent enzyme[24] and, as it likely works near the thermodynamic equilibrium, the acetoacetyl-CoA/3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA ratio will be dependent on the NADH/NAD+ ratio. As it has been demonstrated in solventogenic C. acetobutylicum cells that the NADPH/NADP+ ratio is at least 70 times higher than the NADH/NAD+ ratio[25], we anticipate that it would be advantageous to replace Hbd by a strictly NADPH-dependent enzyme to decrease the acetoacetyl-CoA/3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA ratio and potentially improve the butanol/ethanol ratio. Such an enzyme has been identified and characterized in Clostridium kluyveri[26]. In strain CAB1060, we have replaced hbd by hbd1 from C. kluyveri. A drastic improvement in the butanol/ethanol ratio (Fig. 2b) and the n-butanol fluxes (Supplementary Fig. 1) were observed with, respectively, 6- and 1.6-fold increase. Enzyme assays on crude extract confirm that in the genetic modification of CAB1060, the NADH-dependent 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase activity was very low while the NADPH-dependent activity was high; the reverse was observed for CAB1059 (Supplementary Fig. 2). CAB1060 produces n-butanol at high yield (0.34 g/g) (Table 1) in a simple mineral media without the addition of an organic nitrogen source. Attempt to abolish acetate production in the CAB1060 strain by either deleting pta and ack (that code for the phospho-transacetylase and the acetate kinase involved in the last two steps of acetate formation) or hydA that codes for the main hydrogenase of C. acetobutylicum were unsuccessful suggesting that such mutants were not viable. The pta-ack mutant might not be viable due its inability to redirect all the electron flow from hydrogen production to NADH production using the Ferredoxin NAD+ reductase enzyme while the hydA mutant might not be viable due to its inability to either avoid acetate production or to re-oxidize reduced ferredoxin to produce NADH or both. If a method to simultaneously inactivate several genes would be available, it would have been interesting to delete at the same time pta, ack, and hydA as such a strain might be viable: eliminating both acetate and hydrogen would lead to a strain converting glucose to butanol and ethanol with a perfectly equilibrated redox balance.
Fig. 1

Metabolic engineering of Clostridium acetobutylicum for n-butanol production. a Elimination of by-products formation (strain CAB1057) by gene deletion. ldhA lactate dehydrogenase, ctfAB acetoacetyl-CoA-acetate CoA-transferase, adc acetoacetate decarboxylase, ptb phosphotransbutyrylase, buk butyrate kinase, adhE2 bifunctional NAD+-dependent aldehyde and alcohol dehydrogenase. b Optimization of acetyl-CoA conversion to n-butanol (Strain CAB1060) using a chimeric pathway derived from three different microorganisms. Blue C. acetobutylicum; black E. coli, red C. kluyveri; Green boxes are Rex binding sites. atoB acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase/synthase, hbd1 NADP+-dependent 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase, crt crotonase, bcd-etfAB butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase

Fig. 2

Optimization of the n-butanol-producing strain. All strains were evaluated in phosphate-limited chemostat cultures at pH 4.4 for wild type and 5.0 for all the other strains. All the engineered strain produced no acetone, lactate, and butyrate. a n-Butanol, acetate, hydrogen, and NAD(P)H from Fdred yields (mol/mol glucose). b Product ratios (mol/mol). (C4 + C3)/C2 = (Butanol + Butyric acid + Acetone)/ (Ethanol + Acetic acid). Butanol selectivity = Butanol/(Σ of all products except butanol). Error bars represent SD of three biological replicates

Table 1

Representative studies of high level butanol production in C. acetobutylicum and C. beijerinckii

StrainTypeSubstrate/MediumFermentation TypeButanol Yield (g/g)Butanol Titer (g/L)Butanol Productivity (g/L/hr)Reference
C.acetobutylicum ATCC824Wild typeGlucose/synthetic mediumBatch0.18100.25Ref.[38]
C.acetobutylicum ATCC824Wild typeGlucose/synthetic medium + 1 mM MVBatch0.2713.50.22Ref.[38]
C.acetobutylicum ATCC824Wild typeGlucose/synthetic mediumContinuous chemostat0.1858.81.1Ref.[33]
C.acetobutylicum XY16Wild typeGlucose/complex mediumContinuous immobilized0.315.711.3Ref.[39]
C.acetobutylicum ATCC824Wild typeGlucose/complex mediumContinuous extractive pervaporation0.231320.74Ref.[40]
C.acetobutylicum ATCC824(pGROE1)EngineeredGlucose/complex mediumBatchNA17.10.14Ref.[41]
C.acetobutylicum HKKOEngineeredGlucose/complex mediumBatch0.218.20.38Ref.[42]
C.acetobutylicum BEKW(pPthlAAD)EngineeredGlucose/complex mediumBatch0.2918.90.33Ref.[43]
C.acetobutylicum ATCC824 pfkA+pykAEngineeredGlucose/complex mediumFed-batch0.2119.10.19Ref.[44]
C.acetobutylicum BKM19EngineeredGlucose/complex mediumContinuous cell recycle0.1711.910.7Ref.[45]
C.acetobutylicum CAB1060EngineeredGlucose/synthetic mediumContinuous extractive distillation0.3555014This study
C. beijerinckii P260Wild typeGlucose/complex mediumBatch0.2611.80.25Ref.[46]
C. beijerinckii P260Wild typeGlucose/complex mediumBatch vacuum fermentation0.2035.90.27Ref.[46]
C. beijerinckii DSM 2152Wild typeGlucose/complex mediumContinuous extractive gas striping0.19NA0.63Ref.[47]
Metabolic engineering of Clostridium acetobutylicum for n-butanol production. a Elimination of by-products formation (strain CAB1057) by gene deletion. ldhA lactate dehydrogenase, ctfAB acetoacetyl-CoA-acetate CoA-transferase, adc acetoacetate decarboxylase, ptb phosphotransbutyrylase, buk butyrate kinase, adhE2 bifunctional NAD+-dependent aldehyde and alcohol dehydrogenase. b Optimization of acetyl-CoA conversion to n-butanol (Strain CAB1060) using a chimeric pathway derived from three different microorganisms. Blue C. acetobutylicum; black E. coli, red C. kluyveri; Green boxes are Rex binding sites. atoB acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase/synthase, hbd1 NADP+-dependent 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase, crt crotonase, bcd-etfAB butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase Optimization of the n-butanol-producing strain. All strains were evaluated in phosphate-limited chemostat cultures at pH 4.4 for wild type and 5.0 for all the other strains. All the engineered strain produced no acetone, lactate, and butyrate. a n-Butanol, acetate, hydrogen, and NAD(P)H from Fdred yields (mol/mol glucose). b Product ratios (mol/mol). (C4 + C3)/C2 = (Butanol + Butyric acid + Acetone)/ (Ethanol + Acetic acid). Butanol selectivity = Butanol/(Σ of all products except butanol). Error bars represent SD of three biological replicates Representative studies of high level butanol production in C. acetobutylicum and C. beijerinckii The stability of CAB1060 was evaluated in chemostat culture. We could maintain stable n-butanol (between 9 and 10 g/L) and biomass concentrations (Fig. 3a) for more than 45 days and after 13 days of cultures only slight changes in the ethanol/acetate ratio between 1 and 0.8 (mol/mol) were observed (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 1).
Fig. 3

Continuous cultures of C. acetobutylicum CAB1060. a In phosphate-limited chemostat culture at pH 5, b in phosphate-limited high cell density culture at pH 5 with in situ extraction of the alcohols (n-butanol + ethanol) by distillation under low pressure. The arrow indicate the start of the cell bleeding. For both continuous cultures, the initial batch phase is not presented

Continuous cultures of C. acetobutylicum CAB1060. a In phosphate-limited chemostat culture at pH 5, b in phosphate-limited high cell density culture at pH 5 with in situ extraction of the alcohols (n-butanol + ethanol) by distillation under low pressure. The arrow indicate the start of the cell bleeding. For both continuous cultures, the initial batch phase is not presented

Development of continuous process for n-butanol production

Having a stable strain that produces n-butanol at a high yield in a continuous culture is a prerequisite, but it is clearly not sufficient for a commercial process as both the titer and the productivities are too low. To improve those two parameters, several methods of in situ butanol recovery including gas stripping, vacuum fermentation, pervaporation, liquid–liquid extraction, perstraction, and adsorption, have been investigated[27]. However, high volumetric productivities or scaled-up industrial production are still hard to achieve. We then envisioned a continuous high cell density bioreactor with in situ extraction of the alcohols (n-butanol + ethanol) by distillation under low pressure (0.18–0.46 × 104 Pa, for a boiler temperature regulated between 35 and 37 °C) without using any microfiltration membrane (Fig. 4). The advantages of this method are (1) that the fermentor is at atmospheric pressure which allows the fermentation gas to be eliminated without pumping and limit the cost for low pressure distillation compared to vacuum fermentation and (2) high cell density can be obtained without the use of microfiltration membranes. Three runs of continuous extractive fermentation were performed (Supplementary Table 1) but only the run III will be presented in detail below. After an initial batch phase without distillation, this setup was run in a fed-batch mode by (i) starting vacuum distillation and (ii) exponentially feeding the reactor with a medium at a high concentration of glucose (~530 g/L) while maintaining full cell retention until reaching an OD 600 nm of 90–100 (Fig. 3b), which corresponds to ~28–30 g/L cell dry weight. As shown in Fig. 3b, the targeted cell density was reached in ~70 hours after vacuum distillation and feeding began, at which point a cell bleeding was implemented at a dilution rate of 0.05 h−1 to maintain a constant cell density and perform the fermentation in a continuous mode. The concentration of n-butanol in the fermentor was between 9 and 10.5 g/L (Supplementary Fig. 3) while the average concentration of n-butanol in the butanol-rich phase that was continuously collected was 550 g/L with concurrent average ethanol and acetate titers of 60 and 3.3 g/L (Supplementary Fig. 3). Starting at hour 70 and for 170 hours afterwards (i.e., up to 240 hours of fermentation time), the volumetric productivities of butanol and ethanol remained essentially constant, along with the glucose volumetric consumption. For the three runs (Supplementary Table 1), the average volumetric productivities of n-butanol and ethanol were 14 and 1.5 g/L/hr, respectively, and the average glucose volumetric consumption rate was 39.4 g/L/hr. This resulted in an average n-butanol yield of 0.35 g/g (~84% of the theoretical maximum) and n-butanol + ethanol yield of 0.39 g/g[28]. Such high values of n-butanol productivities, titer, and yield compare very well with the performances of the best corn wet milling continuous industrial ethanol processes that display ethanol titers of ~100 g/L, yield of 0.46 g/g (~90% of the theoretical maximum) and productivity of 10 g/L/hr[29]. In the US the selling price of n-butanol is 2.3 times higher than ethanol ($1.2 per kg versus $0.5 per kg, ISIS data of September 2017) while the yield of alcohol formation of our process is only 1.25 lower than the ethanol process. If scaled-up at the industrial scale, the technology presented here should drastically decrease both the operational and capital expenditure costs of the historical Weizmann process and make the commercial production of n-butanol economical and more attractive than the production of ethanol.
Fig. 4

Schematic representation of the extractive continuous fermentation process. The fermentor, boiler, and decantor have working volumes of 0.5 L, 0.3 L, and 0.1 L, respectively. For more details see Methods

Schematic representation of the extractive continuous fermentation process. The fermentor, boiler, and decantor have working volumes of 0.5 L, 0.3 L, and 0.1 L, respectively. For more details see Methods

Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and primers

The bacterial strain and plasmids used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Table 3. The specific oligonucleotides used for PCR amplification were synthesized by Eurogentec (Supplementary Table 4).

General protocol for gene deletion

Gene disruption in specified chromosomal loci was carried out by homologous recombination[13] with the modifications of patent application WO2008/040387[30]. Deletion cassettes consisting of the upstream homologous region-FRT-catP-FRT-downstream homologous region were cloned in the pSOS95-MLSr-upp plasmid. The pSOS95-MLSr-upp plasmids with the different deletion cassettes were used to transform the successive recipient C. acetobutylicum strains which were constructed from the MGCΔcac1502Δupp platform strain[13]. As a general procedure, thiamphenicol-resistant transformants were selected on CGM 50 g/L Glucose 0.1 M MES pH 6.1 (CGMMG) plates containing thiamphenicol (10 μg/mL) (Tm). One colony was cultured for 24 hours in liquid CGMMG with thiamphenicol (10 μg/mL) and 100 μL of undiluted culture was plated on CGMMG with thiamphenicol (10 μg/mL) and 5-FU (1 mM). Colonies resistant to both thiamphenicol and 5-FU were replica plated on both CGMMG with thiamphenicol (5 μg/mL) and CGMMG with clarithromycin (40 μg/mL) to select clones where 5-FU resistance is also associated with clarithromycin sensitivity. The genotype of the clones resistant to thiamphenicol and sensitive to clarithromycin was checked by PCR. The catP resistance cassette was removed by transforming the strain with plasmid pCLF1 expressing the flp1 gene encoding the Flp recombinase from S. cerevisiae[13]. One colony of a clarithromycin resistant clone was cultured on liquid CGMMG without clarithromycin and the culture was plated on CGMMG with 5-FU (1 mM). Colonies resistant to 5-FU were replica plated on CGMMG with clarithromycin (40 μg/mL), CGMMG with thiamphenicol (10 μg/mL), and CGMMG without antibiotic to select clones. The 5-FU resistance was associated with the loss of the pCLF1 vector and the thiamphenicol sensitivity to the elimination of the catP marker. The genotype of sensitive clones was checked by PCR. CAB1057 was constructed from the MGCΔcac1502Δupp platform strain by successively applying this protocol to the deletion of ptb-buk, ctfAB, and ldhA[12,13,30]. CAB1058 was constructed from CAB1057 by applying the same protocol to the deletion of CA_C2713 encoding the Rex regulator and the removal of the catP resistance cassette.

Construction of pEryuppatoB plasmid and CAB1059 strain

A synthetic atoB operon coding for the AtoB thiolase of E. coli was synthesized as follow. A synthetic atoB gene was designed with both an optimized synthetic RBS (translation initiation rate was calculated to be 60217, a value similar to the translation initiation rate of thlA) and a harmonized codon usage for C. acetobutylicum. The synthetic gene was synthesized by Life technology (atoBs) with a BamHI site in 5′ and a SfoI site in 3′ and was cloned in a BamHI-SfoI digested pSOS95 to yield pSOS95atoBs[31]. The synthetic atoB gene was PCR amplified with the Phusion DNA polymerase with pSOSatoBs as a template and the Atob-1 and Atob-2 oligonucleotides as primers. This DNA fragment was directly cloned into the StuI linearized pEryUppAthlA (for the construction of pEryUppAthlA[22]) by homologous recombination using the GeneArt® Seamless Cloning & Assembly kit to yield the pEryUppAtoB plasmid. The pEryUppAtoB plasmid was used to transform by electroporation to CAB1058 strain. After selection on Petri plates for clones having inserted the pEryUppAtoB plasmid by homologous recombination (resistant to erythromycin 20 μg/mL), two colonies were cultured for 24 hours in CGM Glucose MES 0.1 M medium. Appropriate dilutions were plated on CGM Glucose MES 0.1 M (CGMMG) with 5-FU 1mΜ. To select integrants having excised and lost pEryUppAtoB, 5-FU resistant clones were replica plated on both CGMMG with 5FU and CGMMG with erythromycin at 40 μg/mL. To identify clones having lost pEryUppAtoB and possessing an atoB insertion, (clones resistant to 5-FU and sensitive to erythromycin) were checked by PCR analysis (with primers Thl-0 and Thl-5 located outside of the AthlA locus and Atob-1 and Atob-2 primers binding specifically to atoB gene). The clones that had thlA replaced by atoB were isolated to obtain pure clones to obtain CAB1059 strain.

Constructing pSOS95-upp-hbd1-catP-oriRepA and CAB1060 strains

To amplify the two homologous regions flanking the CDS region of the hbd gene on the genome of C. acetobutylicum ATCC824, two couples of primers (primer 1-hbd1-sacII/primer 2 and primer 5/primers 6-hbd1-sacII) were used. Two fragments of 909 bp and 989 bp were obtained. Primer 3 and primer 4 were used to amplify the hbd1 gene from genomic DNA of C. kluyveri DSM555 to obtain the third fragment of 886 bp. Fragment 1 and 3 was fused by overlapping PCR using primer 1-hbd1-sacII and primer 4 to obtain the fourth fragment of 1778 bp. After that, this fourth fragment was fused with the second fragment by primer 1-hbd1-sacII and primer 6-hbd1-sacII to produce the fifth fragment of 2692 bp. The colE1 origin on pSOS95-MLSr-upp[30] was replaced by the repA origin of pSC101. The repA origin was amplified from pSC101 by two primers oriRepA-XbaI-F and oriRepA-5’R to obtain a PCR product of 2296 bp. The partial ampicillin resistant gene from pSOS95-upp was amplified by Amp3′-F and Amp-ScaI-R to obtain a PCR product of 573 bp. The two resultant PCR fragment was then fused by PCR using oriRepA-XbaI-F and Amp-ScaI-R. This 2849 bp fragment was introduced to pSOS95-upp to replace repL fragment by digestion with XbaI and ScaI restriction enzymes and ligation to obtain pSOS95-upp-orirepA. After that, the homologous fragment containing hbd1 CDS was introduced to this pSOS95-upp-orirepA by the SacII site to obtain pSOS95-hbd1-orirepA plasmid. The catP cassette (flanking by FRT sequences) was inserted into the StuI site carried by primer 4 and primer 5 in the homologous region to generate the final plasmid pSOS95-hbd1-catP-oriRepA. The final plasmid pSOS95-hbd1-catP-oriRepA was used to transform into CAB1059 strain and followed the protocol presented above for the deletion[30]. The transformants on plates CGMMG Thiamphenicol 10 μg/mL were selected and checked by PCR for the single integration by two couples of primers etfB-3-F and catP-3D or cac2706-3Rb and catP-5R. The integrants were spread on plates CGMMG containing Thiamphenicol 10 μg/mL and 5-FU 1 mM to promote the second integration. Clones that were Thiamphenicol resistant and Clarithromycin sensitive were selected and checked for double cross-over events by PCR using two external primers etfB-3-F and cac2706-3Rb. The mutants were isolated to obtain CAB1060-catP strain. After that, pCLF1 was introduced into CAB1060-catP strain to remove catP cassette to generate the marker-less strain CAB1060.

Chemostat culture of recombinant strains

The strains were evaluated in phosphate-limited continuous culture[32] fed at 30 g/L glucose at a pH of 5.0. Metabolic flux analysis was performed using the genome scale model previously developed[16].

Continuous extractive high density cell recycle fermentation

A 10% inoculum of mid-exponential phase (OD600nm of 0.8–1.5) CAB1060 culture was used to inoculate a 1 L glass bioreactor with a 0.5 L working volume of anaerobic synthetic medium[33] with 60 g/L glucose. Fermentation pH was controlled from dropping below 5.0 using 4 M NH4OH. Once the cultures reached an OD600nm of three, extractive fermentation using low pressure distillation was initiated. Low pressure distillation was accomplished by sending the whole broth to a 3 L Pyrex boiler (0.3 L working volume) equipped[34] to maintained a constant temperature (35–37 °C) and a constant low pressure (0.18–0.46 × 104 Pa) above the boiler. The distillation column has an internal diameter of 7.8 cm, a height of 60 cm and was filed with mesh column packing from Multiknit Ltd. The decanter was maintained at 2 °C, has a working volume of 0.1 L, and consists of a Pyrex tube with an internal diameter of 2.4 cm and a height of 25 cm. The initial residence time of the broth in the boiler was 0.5 hour. The fermenter was fed exponentially with a feed medium (see the composition below) containing high glucose concentration (530 g/L) by just keeping the volume of the fermentor constant. The distillate was condensed (2 °C) and de-mixed in a butanol-rich- and a water-rich phase; the water-rich phase was recycled to the distillation column while the butanol-rich phase was collected. Once cell concentration reached an OD600nm of 90–100 (28–30 g/L cell dry weight), a cell bleeding was started at a dilution rate of 0.05 h−1 while still keeping volume of the fermenter constant by the addition of feed medium. The residence time of the broth in the boiler was decreased to 0.25 h. The feeding medium has the following composition (per liter of tap water): glucose, 530 g; KH2PO4, 1.8 g; KCl, 5.7 g; MgSO4.7H2O, 3.6 g; FeSO4.7H2O, 0.5 g; NH4Cl, 18 g; Biotin, 0.18 mg; and PAB, 0.14 g.

Measurement of fermentation parameters

Biomass concentration was determined by a DCW method that includes three steps: a centrifugation (16,000 g, 5 min, room temperature) of 1.5 mol broth in an Ependorf tube, two washes with Milli-Q water, and drying under vacuum at 80 °C. The concentrations of glucose, and of all the fermentation products were determined based on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)[35] using a HPX87H (Biorad) column, H2SO4 at 0.5 mM, as mobile phase and a refractometer to quantify the different compounds.

Enzyme activity measurements

Cell crude extract of C. acetobutylicum mutants was prepared in 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 5 mM dithiothreitol, and 2.5% glycerol. The cell suspension was sonicated in an ultrasonic disintegrator (Vibracell 71434; Bioblock, Illkirch, France), at 0 °C in four cycles of 30 s with 2-min intervals between each cycle. Cell debris was removed by three centrifugations at 13,000× g for 5 min. The supernatant was loaded to PD10 column. Thiolase activity was measured in the reverse thiolytic cleavage direction. The reaction containing 0.1 M Tris-HCl pH8; 0.2 mM CoASH; 60 µM Acetoacetyl-CoA; 10 mM MgCl2; and 1 mM DTT and diluted crude extracts was incubated at 30  C and followed the decrease of acetoacetyl-CoA at 303nm[23,36]. The enzyme activity was calculated by the difference in the slope values of the sample and control and using the molar extinction coefficient of 14,000 M−1 cm−1. HBD activity was measured in the physiological direction[36,37]. The reaction containing 0.1 mM MOPS (pH 7.0) buffer, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM acetoacetyl-CoA, and 0.15 mM NADH, and crude extract at different dilution was incubated at 35 °C. The decreasing of NADH was followed spectrophotometrically at 345 nm. The enzyme activity was calculated by the difference in the slope values of the sample and control and using the molar extinction coefficient of 6220 M−1 cm−1. HBD1 activity was measured in the physiological direction[26]. Reaction components were 0.1 M potassium phosphate, 25 mM potassium citrate, 0.15 mM NADPH, 0.6 mM acetoacetyl-CoA, and crude extract. The assay was done at 35 °C and the decrease of NADPH was followed at 340 nm. The molar extinction coefficient of 6220 M−1 cm−1 was used to calculate the enzyme activity.
  36 in total

1.  Thiolase from Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 and Its Role in the Synthesis of Acids and Solvents.

Authors:  D P Wiesenborn; F B Rudolph; E T Papoutsakis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Pervaporative recovery of ABE during continuous cultivation: enhancement of performance.

Authors:  Wouter Van Hecke; Tim Hofmann; Heleen De Wever
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 9.642

3.  Thiolase engineering for enhanced butanol production in Clostridium acetobutylicum.

Authors:  Miriam S Mann; Tina Lütke-Eversloh
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Metabolome remodeling during the acidogenic-solventogenic transition in Clostridium acetobutylicum.

Authors:  Daniel Amador-Noguez; Ian A Brasg; Xiao-Jiang Feng; Nathaniel Roquet; Joshua D Rabinowitz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Purification and properties of NADP-dependent L(+)-3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase from Clostridium kluyveri.

Authors:  V K Madan; P Hillmer; G Gottschalk
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1973-01-03

6.  Enhanced butanol production in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 by double overexpression of 6-phosphofructokinase and pyruvate kinase genes.

Authors:  Jey-R S Ventura; Hui Hu; Deokjin Jahng
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  The genes for butanol and acetone formation in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 reside on a large plasmid whose loss leads to degeneration of the strain.

Authors:  E Cornillot; R V Nair; E T Papoutsakis; P Soucaille
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Cloning and expression of Clostridium acetobutylicum phosphotransbutyrylase and butyrate kinase genes in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J W Cary; D J Petersen; E T Papoutsakis; G N Bennett
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Integration of chemical catalysis with extractive fermentation to produce fuels.

Authors:  Pazhamalai Anbarasan; Zachary C Baer; Sanil Sreekumar; Elad Gross; Joseph B Binder; Harvey W Blanch; Douglas S Clark; F Dean Toste
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Construction of a restriction-less, marker-less mutant useful for functional genomic and metabolic engineering of the biofuel producer Clostridium acetobutylicum.

Authors:  Christian Croux; Ngoc-Phuong-Thao Nguyen; Jieun Lee; Céline Raynaud; Florence Saint-Prix; Maria Gonzalez-Pajuelo; Isabelle Meynial-Salles; Philippe Soucaille
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 6.040

View more
  14 in total

1.  In vitro prototyping and rapid optimization of biosynthetic enzymes for cell design.

Authors:  Ashty S Karim; Quentin M Dudley; Alex Juminaga; Yongbo Yuan; Samantha A Crowe; Jacob T Heggestad; Shivani Garg; Tanus Abdalla; William S Grubbe; Blake J Rasor; David N Coar; Maria Torculas; Michael Krein; FungMin Eric Liew; Amy Quattlebaum; Rasmus O Jensen; Jeffrey A Stuart; Sean D Simpson; Michael Köpke; Michael C Jewett
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 15.040

2.  Establishing Butyribacterium methylotrophicum as a Platform Organism for the Production of Biocommodities from Liquid C1 Metabolites.

Authors:  Jonathan R Humphreys; Skyler D Hebdon; Holly Rohrer; Lauren Magnusson; Chris Urban; Yi-Pei Chen; Jonathan Lo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 5.005

Review 3.  Physiological limitations and opportunities in microbial metabolic engineering.

Authors:  José Montaño López; Lisset Duran; José L Avalos
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Metabolic engineering of Clostridium thermocellum for n-butanol production from cellulose.

Authors:  Liang Tian; Peter M Conway; Nicholas D Cervenka; Jingxuan Cui; Marybeth Maloney; Daniel G Olson; Lee R Lynd
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 5.  Consolidated bioprocessing for butanol production of cellulolytic Clostridia: development and optimization.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Wen; Qi Li; Jinle Liu; Mingjie Jin; Sheng Yang
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 5.813

6.  Transcriptional analysis of amino acid, metal ion, vitamin and carbohydrate uptake in butanol-producing Clostridium beijerinckii NRRL B-598.

Authors:  Maryna Vasylkivska; Katerina Jureckova; Barbora Branska; Karel Sedlar; Jan Kolek; Ivo Provaznik; Petra Patakova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Synthetic Biology on Acetogenic Bacteria for Highly Efficient Conversion of C1 Gases to Biochemicals.

Authors:  Sangrak Jin; Jiyun Bae; Yoseb Song; Nicole Pearcy; Jongoh Shin; Seulgi Kang; Nigel P Minton; Philippe Soucaille; Byung-Kwan Cho
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Improved CRISPR/Cas9 Tools for the Rapid Metabolic Engineering of Clostridium acetobutylicum.

Authors:  Tom Wilding-Steele; Quentin Ramette; Paul Jacottin; Philippe Soucaille
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Renewable fatty acid ester production in Clostridium.

Authors:  Jun Feng; Jie Zhang; Yuechao Ma; Yiming Feng; Shangjun Wang; Na Guo; Haijiao Wang; Pixiang Wang; Pablo Jiménez-Bonilla; Yanyan Gu; Junping Zhou; Zhong-Tian Zhang; Mingfeng Cao; Di Jiang; Shuning Wang; Xian-Wei Liu; Zengyi Shao; Ilya Borovok; Haibo Huang; Yi Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  Towards continuous industrial bioprocessing with solventogenic and acetogenic clostridia: challenges, progress and perspectives.

Authors:  Charlotte Anne Vees; Christian Simon Neuendorf; Stefan Pflügl
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.346

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.