Literature DB >> 30205677

Protein Dielectrophoresis in Solution.

Salman S Seyedi1, Dmitry V Matyushov2.   

Abstract

Proteins experience either pulling or repelling force from the gradient of an external electric field due to the effect known as dielectrophoresis (DEP). The susceptibility to the field gradient is traditionally calculated from the solution of the electrostatic boundary-value problem, which requires assigning a dielectric constant to the protein. This assignment is essential since the DEP susceptibility is proportional, in dielectric theories, to the Clausius-Mossotti factor, the sign of which is controlled by whether the protein dielectric constant is below (repelling) or above (pulling) the dielectric constant of water. The dielectric constant is not uniquely or even well-defined for a particle of molecular size and the Clausius-Mossotti factor is shown here to be inadequate for describing the dipolar response of the protein and hydration water. An alternative theory is developed from the standpoint of molecular properties of the protein solute and water solvent. The effective polarity of the protein molecule enters the theory in terms of the variance of its molecular dipole moment and its refractive index. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the protein cytochrome c in solution are performed to calculate the dipolar susceptibilities entering the theory. We find that tumbling of the protein on the nanosecond time scale results in a positive DEP (pulling). The DEP susceptibility for cytochrome c acquired from MD simulations is 103-104 times higher than predicted by the Clausius-Mossotti factor. Nevertheless, this high DEP susceptibility is fully consistent with empirically confirmed Oncley's equation connecting the protein dipole to dielectric increments of protein solutions. For cytochrome c, high DEP susceptibilities calculated from MD are consistent with experimental dielectric data. We provide a general relation connecting the DEP susceptibility to the dielectric increment of solution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30205677     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b06864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  6 in total

1.  Electrostatic solvation and mobility in uniform and non-uniform electric fields: From simple ions to proteins.

Authors:  Dmitry V Matyushov
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 2.  Particle trapping in electrically driven insulator-based microfluidics: Dielectrophoresis and induced-charge electrokinetics.

Authors:  Victor H Perez-Gonzalez
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.595

3.  Protein Dielectrophoresis: I. Status of Experiments and an Empirical Theory.

Authors:  Ralph Hölzel; Ronald Pethig
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  Protein Dielectrophoresis: A Tale of Two Clausius-Mossottis-Or Something Else?

Authors:  Ronald Pethig
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 5.  Protein Albumin Manipulation and Electrical Quantification of Molecular Dielectrophoresis Responses for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Nur Shahira Abdul Nasir; Revathy Deivasigamani; M F Mohd Razip Wee; Azrul Azlan Hamzah; Mohd Hazani Mat Zaid; Muhammad Khairulanwar Abdul Rahim; Aminuddin Ahmad Kayani; Abdullah Abdulhameed; Muhamad Ramdzan Buyong
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.523

6.  Analytical Model for Particle Capture in Nanopores Elucidates Competition among Electrophoresis, Electroosmosis, and Dielectrophoresis.

Authors:  Mauro Chinappi; Misa Yamaji; Ryuji Kawano; Fabio Cecconi
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 15.881

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.