| Literature DB >> 30205558 |
Maciej Janek1, Aleksandra Radtke2,3, Tadeusz M Muzioł4, Maria Jerzykiewicz5, Piotr Piszczek6,7.
Abstract
Titanium(IV)Entities:
Keywords: DFT calculations; band gap modification; composite materials; photoactivity; photoluminescence; titanium(IV) oxo-clusters
Year: 2018 PMID: 30205558 PMCID: PMC6164694 DOI: 10.3390/ma11091661
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
The selected crystal data and structure refinements for (Ti4O2(OiBu)10(O2CR’)2) (R’ = C13H9 (1), PhCl (2), PhNO2 (3); the complete crystallographic data are given in Table S1).
| Parameters | (1) | (2) | (3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Empirical formula | C68H108O16Ti4 | C54H98Cl2O16Ti4 | C54H98N2O20Ti4 |
| Formula weight (g/mol) | 1373.14 | 1265.82 | 1286.94 |
| Temperature (K) | 100(2) | 100(2) | 293(2) |
| Wavelength (Å) | 0.89429 | 0.89429 | 0.71073 |
| Space group | Monoclinic, P 1 21 1 | Tetragonal, P 4 1 | Triclinic, P 1 |
| Unit cell dimensions (Å) and angles (°) | a = 12.447(3) | a = 17.827(3) | a = 17.9713(9) |
| Volume (Å3) | 3666.61(140) | 13180.83(500) | 6991.1(5) |
| Z, Calculated density (Mg/m3) | 2, 1.244 | 8, 1.276 | 4, 1.223 |
| Final R indices (I > 2sigma(I)) | R1
a = 0.0444, | R1
a = 0.0680, | R1
a = 0.0860, |
| Absolute structure parameter | 0.041(3) | 0.387(19) | N/A |
a R1 = Σ||F| − |F||/Σ|F|; b wR2 = (Σw(F2 − F2)2/Σ(w(F2)2) )1/2. CCDC 1826273, 1826276, and 1826277 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for (1), (2), and (3), respectively. These data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: (+44) 1223-336-033; or e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk.
Figure 1The structure of {Ti4O2} core, which was found in (Ti4O2(OR)10(O2CR’)2) (R = iBu, R’ = C13H9 (1), PhCl (2), PhNO2 (3)) complexes (crystallographic ball-stick scheme). For clarity, the terminal alkoxide groups are omitted.
Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) of (Ti4O2(OiBu)10(O2CR’)2) (R’ = C13H9 (1), PhCl (2), PhNO2 (3)).
| Parameter | (1) | (2) | (3) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distances (Å) | ||||
| Ti–Ti | Ti1–Ti3 | 3.1690(11) | 3.2016(16) | 3.2060(12) |
| Ti1–Ti2 | 2.9427(12) | 2.9488(16) | 2.9521(13) | |
| Ti1–Ti4 | 3.1446(12) | 3.1456(15) | 3.1508(12) | |
| Ti2–Ti3 | 3.1566(11) | 3.1532(17) | 3.1617(13) | |
| Ti2–Ti4 | 3.1738(13) | 2.1859(17) | 3.2009(12) | |
| Ti3–Ti4 | 4.0386(16) | 3.9255(16) | 3.9510(13) | |
| Ti–(µ4–O) | Ti1–O2 | 2.0457(30) | 2.0599(39) | 2.059(3) |
| Ti2–O2 | 2.0357(28) | 2.0622(41) | 2.052(3) | |
| Ti3–O2 | 2.0820(27) | 2.0603(38) | 2.074(3) | |
| Ti4–O2 | 2.0896(27) | 2.0264(38) | 2.042(3) | |
| Ti–(µ2–O) | Ti1–O3 | 1.8326(37) | 1.8643(40) | 1.839(3) |
| Ti3–O3 | 1.8499(41) | 1.8182(39) | 1.826(3) | |
| Ti–(µ2–OR) | Ti1–O11 | 1.9609(27) | 1.9515(37) | 1.944(3) |
| Ti1–O1 | 2.0042(28) | 2.0133(38) | 2.017(3) | |
| Ti2–O21 | 1.9979(27) | 2.0095(38) | 2.020(3) | |
| Ti2–O31 | 1.9633(28) | 1.9858(38) | 1.969(3) | |
| Ti3–O1 | 1.9896(36) | 2.0041(39) | 1.993(3) | |
| Ti3–O31 | 2.0981(29) | 2.0698(45) | 2.089(3) | |
| Ti4–O11 | 2.0944(32) | 2.1355(43) | 2.114(3) | |
| Ti4–O21 | 1.9985(30) | 2.0182(44) | 2.004(3) | |
| Ti–O (carb) | Ti4–O111 | 2.027(3) | 2.051(4) | 2.068(4) |
| Ti1–O112 | 2.195(3) | 2.135(4) | 2.145(3) | |
| Ti2–O131 | 2.190(3) | 2.127(5) | 2.142(4) | |
| Ti3–O132 | 2.028(3) | 2.073(5) | 2.056(4) | |
| O–C (carb) | O111–C112 | 1.270(5) | 1.272(8) | 1.267(6) |
| O112–C112 | 1.245(5) | 1.244(8) | 1.240(6) | |
| O131–C132 | 1.245(6) | 1.259(9) | 1.260(7) | |
| O132–C132 | 1.257(6) | 1.255(9) | 1.245(6) | |
| Angles (°) | ||||
| Ti–(µ4–O)–Ti | Ti3–O2–Ti2 | 100.10(12) | 99.80(17) | 100.05(12) |
| Ti3–O2–Ti1 | 100.31(13) | 102.02(17) | 101.76(13) | |
| Ti2–O2–Ti1 | 92.28(12) | 91.36(17) | 91.79(12) | |
| Ti3–O2–Ti4 | 150.98(16) | 147.7(2) | 147.43(15) | |
| Ti2–O2–Ti4 | 100.58(13) | 102.34(18) | 102.83(14) | |
| Ti1–O2–Ti4 | 98.99(12) | 100.66(18) | 100.39(12) | |
| Ti–(µ2–O)–Ti | Ti1–O3–Ti2 | 106.09(15) | 106.5(2) | 107.36(16) |
| Ti–(µ2–OR)–Ti | Ti1–O1–Ti3 | 105.04(15) | 105.72(18) | 106.16(14) |
| Ti1–O11–Ti4 | 101.65(13) | 100.52(19) | 101.79(13) | |
| Ti2–O31–Ti3 | 101.97(14) | 102.04(18) | 102.35(13) | |
| Ti2–O21–Ti4 | 105.16(14) | 104.55(19) | 105.38(15) | |
| O–C–O (carb) | O111–C112–O112 | 126.0(4) | 125.5(6) | 125.5(5) |
| O131–C132–O132 | 126.6(4) | 126.1(6) | 125.8(5) | |
Results of vibrational spectra studies of (1)–(3) complexes.
| Modes | (1) | (2) | (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR | R | IR | R | IR | R | |
| νas(COO) | 1566 (s) | 1611 (s) 1581 (w) | 1590 (s) | 1595 (s) 1552 (m) | 1595 (m) | 1614 (w) |
| νs(COO) | 1448 (m) | 1450 (m) | 1442 (m) | 1459 (m) | 1434 (m) | 1456 (s) |
| νas(NO2) | - | - | - | - | 1530 (m) | 1534 (m) |
| νs(NO2) | - | - | - | - | 1347 (s) | 1349 (m) |
| νa(Ti–µ–O–Ti) | 712 (w) | 700 (m) | - | 699 (m) | - | 697 (m) |
| νa(Ti–µ4–O–Ti) | 636 (m) | 543 (vw) | 635 (m) | 548 (vw) | 643 (m) | 536 (vw) |
The calculated frequencies of the (Ti–O–Ti) modes of {Ti2-(µ2-O)} and {Ti4-(µ4-O)} bridges. In DFT calculations of (1)–(3) complexes the OiBu ligands were exchanged on the OMe one.
| Complex | Mode | Frequency (cm−1) |
|---|---|---|
| (Ti4O2(OMe)10(O2CC13H9)2) ( | νa(Ti–µ–O–Ti) | 703 |
| (Ti4O2(OMe)10(O2CC6H4Cl)2) ( | νa(Ti–µ–O–Ti) | 705 |
| (Ti4O2(OMe)10(O2CC6H4NO2)2) ( | νa(Ti–µ–O–Ti) | 706 |
Figure 2(a) Solid-state UV-Vis absorption spectra of (1)–(3) micrograins; (b) Kubelka–Munk function versus light energy plot used for band gap determination; (c) density-of states (DOS) plots calculated with HSE06/6-31G(d,p) level of theory for (Ti4O2(OMe)10(OOC-C13H9)2) (1), (Ti4O2(OMe)10(OOC-C6H4-Cl)2) (2), and (Ti4O2(OMe)10(OOC-C6H4-NO2)2) (3).
Comparison of experimentally determined band gap values (using diffuse reflectance spectra), and theoretically calculated (HSE06/6-31(d,p) level of theory in calculations of (1)–(3) complexes the OiBu ligands were exchanged on the OMe one).
| Complex | Calculated Band Gap (eV) | Experimental Band Gap (eV) |
|---|---|---|
| (Ti4O2(OMe)10(O2CC13H9)2) ( | 3.93 | 2.55 |
| (Ti4O2(OMe)10(O2CC6H4Cl)2) ( | 4.73 | 3.59 |
| (Ti4O2(OMe)10(O2CC6H4NO2)2) ( | 4.30 | 2.98 |
Figure 3Solid state photoluminescence spectra (1–4) of (Ti4O2(OiBu)10(O2CR’)2) (R’ = C13H9 (1), PhCl (2), PhNO2 (3), PhNH2 (4)) respectively (black plots) collected by 330 nm excitation at room temperature compared to spectra of corresponding acids (grey plots).
Figure 4Raman spectra of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and PMMA–titanium oxo-clusters (TOCs) composites. Arrows indicate the bands, derived from (1)–(4) complexes.
Figure 5SEM images of PMMA + TOCs composites in different magnifications (1) (a,b), (2) (c,d), (3) (e,f), end (4) (g,h).
Figure 6Changes in absorbance of methylene blue (MB) solution with time after addition of PMMA foil with a selected complex. MB = 1 × 10−5 M, PMMA foil surface = 0.64 cm2, T = r.t., l = 1 cm. Presented values are after blind test correction (R2 = 0.9701 (1), 0.9876 (2), 0.9896 (3), 0.9769 (4)).
Rate constants of MB degradation for sole MB, pure PMMA, and PMMA with addition of the studied materials.
| Sample | 103 Rate Constant, h−1 | Sample | 103 Rate Constant, h−1 | 103 Rate Constant in Reference to PMMA, h−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sole MB in darkness | 0.35 ± 0.15 | ( | 4.03 ± 0.32 | 1.51 ± 0.36 |
| sole MB in light | 1.52 ± 0.09 | ( | 2.95 ± 0.15 | 0.43 ± 0.22 |
| PMMA in darkness | 0.26 ± 0.04 | ( | 2.53 ± 0.12 | 0.01 ± 0.20 |
| PMMA in light | 2.52 ± 0.16 | ( | 3.19 ± 0.22 | 0.67 ± 0.27 |
Results of EPR studies for UV-Vis irradiated complexes (PMMA foils) ((Ti4O2(OiBu)10(O2CR’)2) (R’ = C13H9 (1), PhCl (2), PhNO2 (3), PhNH2 (4)).
| Sample | g Parameters | Species | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMMA + | g1 | g2 | g3 | |
| ( | 2.024 | 2.0095 | 2.0034 | O2− |
| 1.967 | 1.957 | 1.938 | Ti(III) | |
| 2.003 | - | 1.997 | O− | |
| ( | 2.024 | 2.0095 | 2.0034 | O2− |
| ( | 2.0185 | 2.0052 | 1.987 | O− |
| ( | 2.0182 | 2.005 | 1.987 | O− |
Figure 7EPR spectrum of UV-Vis irradiated PMMA foil with complex (1).