| Literature DB >> 30205516 |
Julia Concetti1, Caroline L Wilson2.
Abstract
Current evidence strongly suggests that aberrant activation of the NF-κB signalling pathway is associated with carcinogenesis. A number of key cellular processes are governed by the effectors of this pathway, including immune responses and apoptosis, both crucial in the development of cancer. Therefore, it is not surprising that dysregulated and chronic NF-κB signalling can have a profound impact on cellular homeostasis. Here we discuss NFKB1 (p105/p50), one of the five subunits of NF-κB, widely implicated in carcinogenesis, in some cases driving cancer progression and in others acting as a tumour-suppressor. The complexity of the role of this subunit lies in the multiple dimeric combination possibilities as well as the different interacting co-factors, which dictate whether gene transcription is activated or repressed, in a cell and organ-specific manner. This review highlights the multiple roles of NFKB1 in the development and progression of different cancers, and the considerations to make when attempting to manipulate NF-κB as a potential cancer therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Bcl-3; NF-κB; NFKB1; apoptosis; cancer; inflammation; p105/p50
Year: 2018 PMID: 30205516 PMCID: PMC6162711 DOI: 10.3390/cells7090133
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1NF-κB subunit structures and dimeric combinations. All subunits contain a Rel homology domain (RHD). NFKB1 and NFKB2 have a glycine rich region (GRR), followed by an Ankyrin repeat domain (ANK) in the precursors p105 and p100. p65, RelB, and c-Rel contain a transactivation domain (TAD), with RelB additionally containing a leucine zipper (LZ) motif. While most dimers activate transcription, p50:p50, p50:p52, and p52:p52 dimers lack a TAD, and therefore repress transcription in the absence of co-activating factors and p65:RelB, c-Rel:RelB, and RelB:RelB dimers are thought to have limited DNA binding [8,9,10].
Figure 2NFKB1 p105/p50 regulation of gene expression in cancer. Following inflammatory stimulation, IKK functions as the key activator of the NFKB1 signalling pathway. Phosphorylation and ubiquitination of IκB releases p50:p65 dimers which can drive the transcription of tumour-promoting inflammatory genes and anti-apoptotic and proliferative genes. p50 phosphorylation at the S329 site impairs p50:p65 dimer binding to DNA, decreasing Bcl-xL expression leading to increased apoptosis, hindering cancer progression. p105 phosphorylation and ubiquitination leads to its processing by the 26S proteasome, releasing p50 homodimers. The p50:p50:HDAC1 complex represses tumour-promoting inflammatory gene expression thus acting as a tumour-suppressor complex, while p50 homodimers in complex with Bcl-3 or BAG-1 can drive proliferation. In macrophages, aberrant p50 homodimer repression of CXCL10 and IL-12 leads to impaired M1 polarisation. Whilst p50:p50 repression of pro-inflammatory and proliferative mediators can also promote tumour suppression.
NFKB1 SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms) associated with cancer. NFKB1 polymorphisms in different c-94ancer types are associated with either an advantageous or disadvantageous prognosis in different population cohorts.
| SNP | Cancer Type | Sequence; Location; Consequence (If Known) | Prognostic | Cohort | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorectal | ATTG del; -94 promoter region; reduces promoter activity and nuclear protein binding ability, decreasing NFKB1 expression | Disadvantageous | Swedish; Malaysian | [ | |
| Gastric | Disadvantageous | Japanese; Chinese | [ | ||
| Liver | Disadvantageous | Taiwanese | [ | ||
| Bladder | Disadvantageous | Chinese | [ | ||
| Esophageal | Disadvantageous | Northern Indian | [ | ||
| Thyroid | Disadvantageous | Chinese | [ | ||
| Melanoma | Disadvantageous | Brazilian, Swedish | [ | ||
| Nasopharyngeal | Disadvantageous | Chinese | [ | ||
| Oral | Disadvantageous | Taiwanese | [ | ||
| Prostate | Advantageous | Canadian | [ | ||
| Ovarian | Advantageous | Greek | [ | ||
| Cervical | Advantageous | Chinese, Indian | [ | ||
| Liver | AG and GG genotypes | Disadvantageous | Chinese | [ | |
| Liver | GA genotypes | Disadvantageous | Chinese | [ | |
| Liver | AA genotypes | Disadvantageous | Chinese | [ | |
| Gastric | GG genotypes; increased inflammatory cell infiltration, diffuse type gastric cancer and cancer progression | Disadvantageous | Japanese | [ | |
| Gastric | GG and del/del genotypes; -449 in 5′ UTR region; muscle layer tumour invasion and lymph node metastasis | Disadvantageous | Japanese | [ | |
| Gastric | GG genotype; intron 12; increased incorporation of the H3K9me1 and H3K4me1 histones, increased chemomodification, enhanced transcriptional activity, cell proliferation and motility | Disadvantageous | Chinese | [ | |
| Gastric | A genotype; intronic region | Advantageous | Japanese, US | [ | |
| Ovarian | T genotype; intron 12 | Advantageous | Chinese | [ | |
| Ovarian | G genotype; intron 4 | Advantageous | Chinese | [ |