Literature DB >> 30205231

Ruxolitinib Therapy Followed by Reduced-Intensity Conditioning for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis: Myeloproliferative Disorders Research Consortium 114 Study.

Vikas Gupta1, Heidi E Kosiorek2, Adam Mead3, Rebecca B Klisovic4, John P Galvin5, Dmitriy Berenzon6, Abdulraheem Yacoub7, Auro Viswabandya8, Ruben A Mesa2, Judith Goldberg9, Leah Price9, Mohamed E Salama10, Rona Singer Weinberg11, Raajit Rampal12, Noushin Farnoud12, Amylou C Dueck2, John O Mascarenhas13, Ronald Hoffman13.   

Abstract

We evaluated the feasibility of ruxolitinib therapy followed by a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen for patients with myelofibrosis (MF) undergoing transplantation in a 2-stage Simon phase II trial. The aims were to decrease the incidence of graft failure (GF) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) compared with data from the previous Myeloproliferative Disorders Research Consortium 101 Study. The plan was to enroll 11 patients each in related donor (RD) and unrelated donor (URD) arms, with trial termination if ≥3 failures (GF or death by day +100 post-transplant) occurred in the RD arm or ≥6 failures occurred in the URD. A total of 21 patients were enrolled, including 7 in the RD arm and 14 in the URD arm. The RD arm did not meet the predetermined criteria for proceeding to stage II. Although the URD arm met the criteria for stage II, the study was terminated owing to poor accrual and a significant number of failures. In all 19 transplant recipients, ruxolitinib was tapered successfully without significant side effects, and 9 patients (47%) had a significant decrease in symptom burden. The cumulative incidences of GF, NRM, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and chronic GVHD at 24 months were 16%, 28%, 64%, and 76%, respectively. On an intention-to-treat basis, the 2-year overall survival was 61% for the RD arm and 70% for the URD arm. Ruxolitinib can be integrated as pretransplantation treatment for patients with MF, and a tapering strategy before transplantation is safe, allowing patients to commence conditioning therapy with a reduced symptom burden. However, GF and NRM remain significant.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allogeneic transplantation; GVHD; Myelofibrosis; Ruxolitinib; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30205231      PMCID: PMC6339828          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  27 in total

1.  Effect of conditioning regimens on graft failure in myelofibrosis: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  S Slot; K Smits; N W C J van de Donk; B I Witte; R Raymakers; J J W M Janssen; A E C Broers; P A W Te Boekhorst; S Zweegman
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  A prospective study comparing the outcomes and health-related quality of life in adult patients with myeloid malignancies undergoing allogeneic transplantation using myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta; Tony Panzarella; Le Li; Jabeen Khan; Ajay Sharma; Jeffrey H Lipton; John Kuruvilla; Hans Messner; Shabbir M H Alibhai
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Claire Harrison; Jean-Jacques Kiladjian; Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali; Heinz Gisslinger; Roger Waltzman; Viktoriya Stalbovskaya; Mari McQuitty; Deborah S Hunter; Richard Levy; Laurent Knoops; Francisco Cervantes; Alessandro M Vannucchi; Tiziano Barbui; Giovanni Barosi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory.

Authors:  T R Mendoza; X S Wang; C S Cleeland; M Morrissey; B A Johnson; J K Wendt; S L Huber
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Regimen-related toxicity in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  S I Bearman; F R Appelbaum; C D Buckner; F B Petersen; L D Fisher; R A Clift; E D Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Myelofibrosis: to transplant or not to transplant?

Authors:  Rebecca Devlin; Vikas Gupta
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2016-12-02

7.  Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in patients pretreated with the JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib.

Authors:  N Jaekel; G Behre; A Behning; C Wickenhauser; T Lange; D Niederwieser; H K Al-Ali
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 5.483

8.  A Comparison of the Renal Cell Carcinoma-Symptom Index (RCC-SI) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI).

Authors:  Deepa Rao; Zeeshan Butt; Sarah Rosenbloom; Don Robinson; Jamie Von Roenn; Timothy M Kuzel; David Cella
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure.

Authors:  D F Cella; D S Tulsky; G Gray; B Sarafian; E Linn; A Bonomi; M Silberman; S B Yellen; P Winicour; J Brannon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with primary myelofibrosis: a cohort analysis from the center for international blood and marrow transplant research.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta; Adriana K Malone; Parameswaran N Hari; Kwang Woo Ahn; Zhen-Huan Hu; Robert Peter Gale; Karen K Ballen; Mehdi Hamadani; Eduardo Olavarria; Aaron T Gerds; Edmund K Waller; Luciano J Costa; Joseph H Antin; Rammurti T Kamble; Koen M van Besien; Bipin N Savani; Harry C Schouten; Jeffrey Szer; Jean-Yves Cahn; Marcos J de Lima; Baldeep Wirk; Mahmoud D Aljurf; Uday Popat; Nelli Bejanyan; Mark R Litzow; Maxim Norkin; Ian D Lewis; Gregory A Hale; Ann E Woolfrey; Alan M Miller; Celalettin Ustun; Madan H Jagasia; Michael Lill; Richard T Maziarz; Jorge Cortes; Matt E Kalaycio; Wael Saber
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  9 in total

1.  Impact of ruxolitinib on myelofibrosis patients post allogeneic stem cell transplant-a pilot study.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Pu; Joyson Poulose; Jozef Malysz; Junjia Zhu; Julie C Fanburg-Smith; David F Claxton; Michael G Bayerl
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 2.  Novel therapies vs hematopoietic cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: who, when, how?

Authors:  James England; Vikas Gupta
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

Review 3.  Role of JAK inhibitors in myeloproliferative neoplasms: current point of view and perspectives.

Authors:  Giuseppe G Loscocco; Alessandro M Vannucchi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 4.  Improving allogeneic stem cell transplantation in myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Nico Gagelmann; Nicolaus Kröger
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.490

5.  Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Myelofibrosis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Amar H Sheth; Shaurey Vetsa; Alyssa Grimshaw; Smith Giri; Nikolai A Podoltsev; Lohith Gowda; Roni Tamari; Martin S Tallman; Raajit K Rampal; Amer M Zeidan; Maximilian Stahl
Journal:  Transplant Cell Ther       Date:  2021-05-28

Review 6.  Patterns of Ruxolitinib Therapy Failure and Its Management in Myelofibrosis: Perspectives of the Canadian Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Group.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta; Sonia Cerquozzi; Lynda Foltz; Christopher Hillis; Rebecca Devlin; Mahmoud Elsawy; Kuljit Grewal; Caroline Hamm; Caroline McNamara; Shireen Sirhan; Brian Leber
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-03-05

7.  State-of-the-art review: allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in 2019.

Authors:  Donal P McLornan; Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha; Marie Robin; Yves Chalandon; Claire N Harrison; Nicolaus Kroger
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 9.941

8.  Venetoclax or Ruxolitinib in Pre-Transplant Conditioning Lowers the Engraftment Barrier by Different Mechanisms in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Joanne E Davis; Kelei Du; Mandy J Ludford-Menting; Ashvind Prabahran; Eric Wong; Nicholas D Huntington; Rachel M Koldej; David S Ritchie
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 9.  How We Manage Myelofibrosis Candidates for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Nicola Polverelli; Mirko Farina; Mariella D'Adda; Enrico Damiani; Luigi Grazioli; Alessandro Leoni; Michele Malagola; Simona Bernardi; Domenico Russo
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 6.600

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.