| Literature DB >> 24161923 |
Vikas Gupta1, Adriana K Malone2, Parameswaran N Hari3, Kwang Woo Ahn3, Zhen-Huan Hu3, Robert Peter Gale4, Karen K Ballen5, Mehdi Hamadani6, Eduardo Olavarria7, Aaron T Gerds8, Edmund K Waller9, Luciano J Costa10, Joseph H Antin11, Rammurti T Kamble12, Koen M van Besien13, Bipin N Savani14, Harry C Schouten15, Jeffrey Szer16, Jean-Yves Cahn17, Marcos J de Lima18, Baldeep Wirk19, Mahmoud D Aljurf20, Uday Popat21, Nelli Bejanyan22, Mark R Litzow23, Maxim Norkin19, Ian D Lewis24, Gregory A Hale25, Ann E Woolfrey8, Alan M Miller26, Celalettin Ustun22, Madan H Jagasia14, Michael Lill27, Richard T Maziarz28, Jorge Cortes21, Matt E Kalaycio8, Wael Saber3.
Abstract
We evaluated outcomes and associated prognostic factors in 233 patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for primary myelofibrosis (MF) using reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC). The median age at RIC HCT was 55 yr. Donors were a matched sibling donor (MSD) in 34% of RIC HCTs, an HLA well-matched unrelated donor (URD) in 45%, and a partially matched/mismatched URD in 21%. Risk stratification according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) was 12% low, 49% intermediate-1, 37% intermediate-2, and 1% high. The probability of survival at 5 yr was 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40% to 53%). In a multivariate analysis, donor type was the sole independent factor associated with survival. Adjusted probabilities of survival at 5-yr were 56% (95% CI, 44% to 67%) for MSD, 48% (95% CI, 37% to 58%) for well-matched URD, and 34% (95% CI, 21% to 47%) for partially matched/mismatched URD (P = .002). The relative risk (RR) for NRM was 3.92 (P = .006) for well-matched URD and 9.37 (P < .0001) for partially matched/mismatched URD. Trends toward increased NRM (RR, 1.7; P = .07) and inferior survival (RR, 1.37; P = .10) were observed in DIPSS intermediate-2/high-risk patients compared with DIPSS low/intermediate-1 risk patients. Our data indicate that RIC HCT is a potentially curative option for patients with MF, and that donor type is the most important factor influencing survival in these patients.Entities:
Keywords: Allogeneic transplantation; Myelofibrosis; Prognosis; Reduced intensity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24161923 PMCID: PMC3886623 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.10.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ISSN: 1083-8791 Impact factor: 5.742