Literature DB >> 30205163

Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Lixing Chen1, Songshu Xiao1, Xiaogang Zhu1, Sili He1, Min Xue2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To investigate risk factors for infertility and recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) after previous CSP.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1).
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Between January 2007 and April 2016, a total of 650 patients were included, all diagnosed with CSP and treated by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and uterine artery embolization (UAE), followed by suction curettage under hysteroscopic guidance. INTERVENTION: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Follow-up of the reproductive outcomes ended in June 2017. A total of 135 of the 650 patients with CSP were involved in the study, among whom 32 became infertile, 78 had an intrauterine pregnancy, and 25 had recurrent CSP after previous CSP. Age (≥35 years; odds ratio [OR], 4.252; p = .002), β-human chorionic gonadotropin (≤5000 mIU/mL; OR, 3.778; p = .011), and longer duration of amenorrhea (>56 days; OR, 2.507; p = .05) were risk factors for infertility. Treatment with UAE (OR, 5.796; p = .003), more abortions (≥4; OR, 2.851; p = .022), and being asymptomatic (OR, 4.175; p = .039) were risk factors for recurrent CSP. There was no statistically significant difference in the subsequent outcomes of pregnant women in the HIFU and UAE groups (p >.05).
CONCLUSION: More attention should be given to subsequent reproductive outcomes after CSP, not only for intrauterine pregnancy, but also for infertility and recurrent CSP. Early diagnosis and treatment of CSP could reduce the risk of infertility and recurrent CSP. HIFU seemed to be superior to UAE in reducing the risk of recurrent CSP. Patients with CSP should adhere to strict contraception if they do not desire more children.
Copyright © 2018 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean scar pregnancy; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Infertility; Recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy; Risk factors; Uterine artery embolization

Year:  2018        PMID: 30205163     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of the treatment of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Lin Mu; Huifang Weng; Xiaoyun Wang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  A study on the timing of uterine artery embolization followed by pregnancy excision for cesarean scar pregnancy: a prospective study in China.

Authors:  Liping Yu; Zhuowei Xue; Bikang Yang; Qinyang Xu; Yincheng Teng
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy among Transvaginal Sonography, Transabdominal Sonography, and 3.0 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Early Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Ke Wang; Fangbin Jing
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Clinical efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) I and II.

Authors:  Yanglu Liu; Qiaozhi Yin; Fan Xu; Shuang Luo
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.105

5.  Comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and uterine artery embolization in the management of cervical pregnancy.

Authors:  Waixing Li; Xiaoli Gan; Nidhi Kashyap; Lingxiao Zou; Aiqian Zhang; Dabao Xu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.