Literature DB >> 30204600

Mean mid-arm circumference and blood pressure cuff sizes for US children, adolescents and adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-2016.

Yechiam Ostchega1, Jeffery P Hughes1, Tatiana Nwankwo1, Guangyu Zhang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Measuring blood pressure (BP) requires an appropriate BP cuff size given measured mid-arm circumference (mid-AC).
OBJECTIVE: To provide mid-AC means and percentiles for US population aged more than 3 years and examine the frequency distribution of mid-AC cuffed by Baum and Welch Allyn cuff systems. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 2011-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a cross-sectional survey, was used to estimate mean mid-AC (n=24 723).
RESULTS: Mean mid-AC did not differ from 2011 to 2016 (31.0 vs. 31.3 cm, P>0.05). During 2011-2016, mean mid-AC was greater for males than females (32.0 vs. 30.4 cm, P<0.001) and was largest among adults 40-49 years (34.0 cm). Non-Hispanic Black persons had the largest mean mid-AC (32.0 cm) and non-Hispanic Asian persons the smallest (28.4 cm). Increased BMI was associated with increased mean mid-AC for those 3-19 years (normal, 22.0 cm and obese, 31.5 cm, P<0.001) and more than 20 years (normal, 28.2 cm and obese, 37.8 cm, P<0.001). Among those aged 8-17 years, high BP status was associated with a larger mean mid-AC (normotensive 26.1 cm vs. high BP 28.2 cm, P=0.001). Among adults aged 18 years and older, hypertension status was associated with a larger mean mid-AC (normotensive 32.4 cm vs. hypertensive 34.2 cm, P<0.001). Among those aged 12-19 years, 13.0% required a Baum large cuff (35-46.9 cm mid-AC) and 21.7% required a Welch Allyn large cuff (32-39.9 cm mid-AC). Among those aged more than 20 years, 33.2% required a Baum large cuff, 48.2% required a Welch Allyn large cuff, 1.3% required a Baum extra-large cuff (44-66 cm mid-AC), and 9.5% required a Welch Allyn extra-large cuff (40-55 cm mid-AC).
CONCLUSION: Currently, BP is obtained in clinic, pharmacy, home, and ambulatory setting using single or multiple cuffs. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey mid-AC data should be considered for accurate cuffing avoiding cuff hypertension or hypotension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30204600      PMCID: PMC7428080          DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  25 in total

1.  The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Factors Associated With Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Among US Adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-2014.

Authors:  Yechiam Ostchega; Guangyu Zhang; Brian K Kit; Tatiana Nwankwo
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Blood pressure measurement in public places.

Authors:  John W Graves
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.292

4.  The importance of cuff width in measurement of blood pressure indirectly.

Authors:  L A Geddes; R Tivey
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res Cent Bull       Date:  1976 Jan-Mar

5.  A survey of validated automated home blood pressure monitors available for the Internet shopper.

Authors:  John W Graves
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.444

6.  The effect of cuff width on systolic blood pressure measurements in neonates.

Authors:  L G Lum; M D Jones
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  National health and nutrition examination survey: sample design, 2011-2014.

Authors:  Clifford L Johnson; Sylvia M Dohrmann; Vicki L Burt; Leyla K Mohadjer
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  2014-03

8.  Validation of the Welch Allyn SureBP (inflation) and StepBP (deflation) algorithms by AAMI standard testing and BHS data analysis.

Authors:  Bruce S Alpert
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 9.  Review: a century of confusion; which bladder for accurate blood pressure measurement?

Authors:  E O'Brien
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.012

10.  National health and nutrition examination survey: plan and operations, 1999-2010.

Authors:  George Zipf; Michele Chiappa; Kathryn S Porter; Yechiam Ostchega; Brenda G Lewis; Jennifer Dostal
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 1       Date:  2013-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Consensus paper on the evaluation and treatment of resistant hypertension by the Turkish Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Asife Sahinarslan; Emine Gazi; Meryem Aktoz; Cigdem Ozkan; Gülay Ulusal Okyay; Ozgul Ucar Elalmis; Erdal Belen; Reviewers Atila Bitigen; Ulver Derici; Neslihan Bascil Tutuncu; Aylin Yildirir
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.596

2.  Improving Accurate Blood Pressure Cuff Allocation in Patients with Obesity: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Victoria Eley; Aaron Khoo; Christine Woods; Andre van Zundert
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.