Literature DB >> 30204078

Evaluation of Ovarian Cancer: Initial Application of Coregistered Photoacoustic Tomography and US.

Sreyankar Nandy1, Atahar Mostafa1, Ian S Hagemann1, Matthew A Powell1, Eghbal Amidi1, Kathryn Robinson1, David G Mutch1, Cary Siegel1, Quing Zhu1.   

Abstract

Purpose To assess transvaginal coregistered photoacoustic tomography (PAT) and pulse-echo US for diagnosis of ovarian cancer based on functional parameters provided by PAT. Materials and Methods Between February 2017 and December 2017, 26 ovarian masses from 16 participants were successfully imaged in vivo by multispectral photoacoustic imaging, including nine invasive epithelial ovarian cancers (six serous carcinomas and three endometroid adenocarcinomas), three other tumors (two borderline serous tumors and one sex cord-stromal tumor), and 14 benign and normal (hereafter referred to as benign/normal) ovaries. The relative total hemoglobin concentration (rHbT) and mean oxygen saturation (sO2) shown at PAT were used to characterize the ovaries identified at US. Results The average rHbT was 1.9 times higher for invasive epithelial cancers than for the benign/normal ovaries (P = .01). Additionally, the rHbT distribution was extensive in invasive epithelial cancers, but was scattered in benign/normal ovaries. However, the rHbT of two borderline serous tumors and one stromal tumor was in the same range as that of benign/normal ovaries. The mean sO2 of invasive epithelial cancers, and of the borderline and stromal tumors, was 8.2% lower than that of benign/normal ovaries (P = .003). Discussion Invasive epithelial ovarian cancers showed higher and extensive tumor vascularity and lower oxygen saturation than benign and normal ovaries. Two borderline noninvasive serous and one stromal tumor showed low oxygen saturation compared with benign and normal ovaries. ©RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30204078      PMCID: PMC6283286          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018180666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   29.146


  23 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging: a review.

Authors:  Ben Cox; Jan G Laufer; Simon R Arridge; Paul C Beard
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 2.  Photoacoustic tomography: in vivo imaging from organelles to organs.

Authors:  Lihong V Wang; Song Hu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Preliminary results of ex vivo multispectral photoacoustic imaging in the management of thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Vikram S Dogra; Bhargava K Chinni; Keerthi S Valluru; Jacob Moalem; Ellen J Giampoli; Katie Evans; Navalgund A Rao
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists.

Authors:  Erin I Neuschler; Reni Butler; Catherine A Young; Lora D Barke; Margaret L Bertrand; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Stamatia Destounis; Pamela Donlan; Stephen R Grobmyer; Janine Katzen; Kenneth A Kist; Philip T Lavin; Erini V Makariou; Tchaiko M Parris; Kathy J Schilling; F Lee Tucker; Basak E Dogan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Noninvasive Determination of Melanoma Depth using a Handheld Photoacoustic Probe.

Authors:  Yong Zhou; Shivani V Tripathi; Ilana Rosman; Jun Ma; Pengfei Hai; Gerald P Linette; M Laurin Council; Ryan C Fields; Lihong V Wang; Lynn A Cornelius
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 8.551

6.  Metastatic status of sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma determined noninvasively with multispectral optoacoustic imaging.

Authors:  Ingo Stoffels; Stefan Morscher; Iris Helfrich; Uwe Hillen; Julia Leyh; Julia Lehy; Neal C Burton; Thomas C P Sardella; Jing Claussen; Thorsten D Poeppel; Hagen S Bachmann; Alexander Roesch; Klaus Griewank; Dirk Schadendorf; Matthias Gunzer; Joachim Klode
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 7.  Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human tumors: a review.

Authors:  P Vaupel; F Kallinowski; P Okunieff
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Design of optimal light delivery system for co-registered transvaginal ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging of ovarian tissue.

Authors:  Hassan S Salehi; Patrick D Kumavor; Hai Li; Umar Alqasemi; Tianheng Wang; Chen Xu; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2015-08-17

9.  The state of the art in breast imaging using the Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope: results from 31 measurements on malignancies.

Authors:  Michelle Heijblom; Daniele Piras; Frank M van den Engh; Margreet van der Schaaf; Joost M Klaase; Wiendelt Steenbergen; Srirang Manohar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Fast label-free multilayered histology-like imaging of human breast cancer by photoacoustic microscopy.

Authors:  Terence T W Wong; Ruiying Zhang; Pengfei Hai; Chi Zhang; Miguel A Pleitez; Rebecca L Aft; Deborah V Novack; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  22 in total

1.  Cylindrical illumination with angular coupling for whole-prostate photoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Brittani Bungart; Yingchun Cao; Tiffany Yang-Tran; Sean Gorsky; Lu Lan; Darren Roblyer; Michael O Koch; Liang Cheng; Timothy Masterson; Ji-Xin Cheng
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 2.  Development of Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography as a Clinically Translatable Modality for Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  William M MacCuaig; Meredith A Jones; Oshaani Abeyakoon; Lacey R McNally
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-11-20

3.  Fiber endface illumination diffuser for endo-cavity photoacoustic imaging.

Authors:  Hongbo Luo; Guang Yang; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.776

Review 4.  Photoacoustic Imaging in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Binita Shrestha; Frank DeLuna; Mark A Anastasio; Jing Yong Ye; Eric M Brey
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  A Deep Learning Approach to Photoacoustic Wavefront Localization in Deep-Tissue Medium.

Authors:  Kerrick Johnstonbaugh; Sumit Agrawal; Deepit Abhishek Durairaj; Christopher Fadden; Ajay Dangi; Sri Phani Krishna Karri; Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 6.  Repurposing Molecular Imaging and Sensing for Cancer Image-Guided Surgery.

Authors:  Suman B Mondal; Christine M O'Brien; Kevin Bishop; Ryan C Fields; Julie A Margenthaler; Samuel Achilefu
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  High-Resolution Photoacoustic Tomography for Early-Stage Cancer Detection and Its Clinical Translation.

Authors:  Jinde Zhang; Fei Duan; Yajing Liu; Liming Nie
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-05-22

Review 8.  Current update on the molecular genetics and management of hereditary ovarian cancers: a primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Malak Itani; Neeraj Lalwani; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Maria Zulfiqar; Cary Siegel
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-04-13

9.  Photoacoustic laser effects in live mouse blastocysts: pilot safety studies of DNA damage from photoacoustic imaging doses.

Authors:  Erin Newcomer; Guang Yang; Bei Sun; Hongbo Luo; Duanwen Shen; Samuel Achilefu; Valerie Ratts; Joan Riley; John Yeh; Quing Zhu
Journal:  F S Sci       Date:  2020-07-14

Review 10.  The emerging role of photoacoustic imaging in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Li Lin; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.