Literature DB >> 17657150

Impact of blood loss on outcome after liver resection.

Marieke T de Boer1, I Quintus Molenaar, Robert J Porte.   

Abstract

Partial liver resections are the treatment of choice for patients with a malignant liver or bile duct tumor. The most frequent indications for partial liver resections are colorectal metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma. Liver resection is the only therapy with a chance for cure in these patients. Refinements in surgical technique and increasing experience have contributed to a reduction in perioperative morbidity and mortality in recent years. Despite these improvements, partial liver resections remain a major surgical procedure and carry the risk for excessive blood loss and a subsequent need for blood transfusion. Blood transfusions have been associated with systemic side effects, such as depression of the immune system. Several studies have suggested that perioperative blood loss or transfusions have a negative impact on postoperative outcome. However, it has been debated whether this is due to a real cause-effect relationship or merely the result of more complicated surgery. We have reviewed the literature concerning studies focusing on the relationship between blood loss and blood transfusion during liver surgery for malignant tumors and postoperative outcome. Most studies were based on a retrospective analysis of single center experiences, using uni- and multivariate statistical methods. Most studies have demonstrated a significant and clinically relevant association between blood transfusion and postoperative mortality and morbidity, especially postoperative infectious complications. The effect of blood transfusions on tumor recurrence and more long-term mortality is much less clear and evidence varies depending on the type of malignancy. The strongest indication that blood transfusion may have an impact on tumor recurrence has been found for patients with early stages of HCC. However, overall, no such effect could be demonstrated for patients undergoing partial liver resection for late stages of HCC, colorectal liver metastasis or cholangiocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17657150     DOI: 10.1159/000103656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  54 in total

1.  Equivalent outcomes after anatomical and non-anatomical resection of small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with preserved liver function.

Authors:  Yoshito Tomimaru; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Shigeru Marubashi; Hiroshi Wada; Shogo Kobayashi; Masahiro Tanemura; Koji Umeshita; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori; Hiroaki Nagano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Central venous pressure and liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael J Hughes; Nicholas T Ventham; Ewen M Harrison; Stephen J Wigmore
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Ultrasonically activated device for parenchymal division during open hepatectomy.

Authors:  G Belli; P Limongelli; A Belli; C Fantini; A D'Agostino; L Cioffi; G Russo
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Feasibility of liver resection without the use of the routine Pringle manoeuver: an analysis of 248 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Kit-fai Lee; John Wong; Wilson Ng; Yue-sun Cheung; Paul Lai
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Validation of a Nomogram to Predict the Risk of Perioperative Blood Transfusion for Liver Resection.

Authors:  Fabio Bagante; Gaya Spolverato; Andrea Ruzzenente; Ana Wilson; Faiz Gani; Simone Conci; Alexander Yahanda; Tommaso Campagnaro; Alfredo Guglielmi; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Evolution of the surgical management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in a Western centre demonstrates improved survival with endoscopic biliary drainage and reduced use of blood transfusion.

Authors:  Alastair L Young; Tsuyoshi Igami; Yoshiki Senda; Robert Adair; Shahid Farid; Giles J Toogood; K Rajendra Prasad; J Peter A Lodge
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Modification of right hepatectomy results in improvement outcome: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Jeff Siu-Wang Wong; Kit-Fai Lee; Yue-Sun Cheung; Ching-Ning Chong; John Wong; Paul Bo-San Lai
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  The influence of PEEP and positioning on central venous pressure and venous hepatic hemodynamics in patients undergoing liver resection.

Authors:  Asi Ukere; Sebastian Meisner; Gillis Greiwe; Benjamin Opitz; Daniel Benten; Björn Nashan; Lutz Fischer; Constantin J C Trepte; Daniel A Reuter; Sebastian A Haas; Christoph R Behem
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Sevoflurane has postconditioning as well as preconditioning properties against hepatic warm ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats.

Authors:  Saki Shiraishi; Sungsam Cho; Daiji Akiyama; Taiga Ichinomiya; Itsuko Shibata; Osamu Yoshitomi; Takuji Maekawa; Eisuke Ozawa; Hisamitsu Miyaaki; Tetsuya Hara
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  A multicentre, randomized clinical trial comparing the Veriset™ haemostatic patch with fibrin sealant for the management of bleeding during hepatic surgery.

Authors:  Robert Öllinger; Andre L Mihaljevic; Christoph Schuhmacher; Hüseyin Bektas; Florian Vondran; Moritz Kleine; Mauricio Sainz-Barriga; Sascha Weiss; Phillip Knebel; Johann Pratschke; Roberto I Troisi
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.