Literature DB >> 30203176

Home sleep apnea testing: comparison of manual and automated scoring across international sleep centers.

Ulysses J Magalang1,2, Jennica N Johns3, Katherine A Wood3, Jesse W Mindel3, Diane C Lim4, Lia R Bittencourt5, Ning-Hung Chen6, Peter A Cistulli7,8, Thorarinn Gíslason9,10, Erna S Arnardottir9,10, Thomas Penzel11, Sergio Tufik5, Allan I Pack4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the agreement between the manual scoring of home sleep apnea tests (HSATs) by international sleep technologists and automated scoring systems.
METHODS: Fifteen HSATs, previously recorded using a type 3 monitor, were saved in European Data Format. The studies were scored by nine experienced technologists from the sleep centers of the Sleep Apnea Global Interdisciplinary Consortium (SAGIC) using the locally available software. Each study was scored separately by human scorers using the nasal pressure (NP), flow derived from the NP signal (transformed NP), or respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP) flow. The same procedure was followed using two automated scoring systems: Remlogic (RLG) and Noxturnal (NOX).
RESULTS: The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) scoring using the NP, transformed NP, and RIP flow were 0.96 [95% CI 0.93-0.99], 0.98 [0.96-0.99], and 0.97 [0.95-0.99], respectively. Using the NP signal, the mean differences in AHI between the average of the manual scoring and the automated systems were - 0.9 ± 3.1/h (AHIRLG vs AHIMANUAL) and - 1.3 ± 2.6/h (AHINOX vs AHIMANUAL). Using the transformed NP, the mean differences in AHI were - 1.9 ± 3.3/h (AHIRLG vs AHIMANUAL) and 1.6 ± 3.0/h (AHINOX vs AHIMANUAL). Using the RIP flow, the mean differences in AHI were - 2.7 ± 4.5/h (AHIRLG vs AHIMANUAL) and 2.3 ± 3.4/h (AHINOX vs AHIMANUAL).
CONCLUSIONS: There is very strong agreement in the scoring of the AHI for HSATs between the automated systems and experienced international technologists. Automated scoring of HSATs using commercially available software may be useful to standardize scoring in future endeavors involving international sleep centers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automation; Computer-assisted diagnosis; Sleep apnea

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30203176      PMCID: PMC6615031          DOI: 10.1007/s11325-018-1715-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep Breath        ISSN: 1520-9512            Impact factor:   2.816


  22 in total

1.  A simple format for exchange of digitized polygraphic recordings.

Authors:  B Kemp; A Värri; A C Rosa; K D Nielsen; J Gade
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-05

2.  Computer-Assisted Automated Scoring of Polysomnograms Using the Somnolyzer System.

Authors:  Naresh M Punjabi; Naima Shifa; Georg Dorffner; Susheel Patil; Grace Pien; Rashmi N Aurora
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Performance of an automated polysomnography scoring system versus computer-assisted manual scoring.

Authors:  Atul Malhotra; Magdy Younes; Samuel T Kuna; Ruth Benca; Clete A Kushida; James Walsh; Alexandra Hanlon; Bethany Staley; Allan I Pack; Grace W Pien
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Accuracy of nasal cannula pressure recordings for assessment of ventilation during sleep.

Authors:  R Thurnheer; X Xie; K E Bloch
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Effectiveness of home respiratory polygraphy for the diagnosis of sleep apnoea and hypopnoea syndrome.

Authors:  Juan F Masa; Jaime Corral; Ricardo Pereira; Joaquin Duran-Cantolla; Marta Cabello; Luis Hernández-Blasco; Carmen Monasterio; Alberto Alonso; Eusebi Chiner; Manuela Rubio; Estefania Garcia-Ledesma; Laura Cacelo; Rosario Carpizo; Lirios Sacristan; Neus Salord; Miguel Carrera; José N Sancho-Chust; Cristina Embid; Francisco-José Vázquez-Polo; Miguel A Negrín; Jose M Montserrat
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  An official ATS/AASM/ACCP/ERS workshop report: Research priorities in ambulatory management of adults with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Samuel T Kuna; M Safwan Badr; R John Kimoff; Clete Kushida; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Patrick Levy; Walter T McNicholas; Patrick J Strollo
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2011-03

7.  Relevance of linearizing nasal prongs for assessing hypopneas and flow limitation during sleep.

Authors:  R Farré; J Rigau; J M Montserrat; E Ballester; D Navajas
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Evaluation of a portable device for diagnosing the sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome.

Authors:  K Dingli; E L Coleman; M Vennelle; S P Finch; P K Wraith; T W Mackay; N J Douglas
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 16.671

9.  Diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing in patients with chronic heart failure: evaluation of a portable limited sleep study system.

Authors:  Lindsay A Smith; Dennis W S Chong; Marjorie Vennelle; Martin A Denvir; David E Newby; Neil J Douglas
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.981

10.  Agreement in the scoring of respiratory events and sleep among international sleep centers.

Authors:  Ulysses J Magalang; Ning-Hung Chen; Peter A Cistulli; Annette C Fedson; Thorarinn Gíslason; David Hillman; Thomas Penzel; Renaud Tamisier; Sergio Tufik; Gary Phillips; Allan I Pack
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 5.849

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Alternative algorithms and devices in sleep apnoea diagnosis: what we know and what we expect.

Authors:  Thomas Penzel; Ingo Fietze; Martin Glos
Journal:  Curr Opin Pulm Med       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  The design of RIP belts impacts the reliability and quality of the measured respiratory signals.

Authors:  Kristofer Montazeri; Sigurdur Aegir Jonsson; Jon Skirnir Agustsson; Marta Serwatko; Thorarinn Gislason; Erna S Arnardottir
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.816

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.