| Literature DB >> 30203142 |
Saif Salih1, Edward Mills2, Jonathan McGregor-Riley2, Mick Dennison2, Simon Royston2.
Abstract
This retrospective case series evaluates the technique of transverse debridement, acute shortening and subsequent distraction histogenesis in the management of open tibial fractures with bone and soft tissue loss, thereby avoiding the need for a soft tissue flap to cover the wound. Thirty-one patients with Gustilo grade III open tibial fractures between 2001 and 2011 were initially managed with transverse wound extensions, debridement and shortening to provide bony apposition and allowing primary wound closure without tension, or coverage with mobilization of soft tissue and split skin graft. Temporary monolateral external fixation was used to allow soft tissues resuscitation, followed by Ilizarov frame for definitive fracture stabilization. Leg length discrepancy was corrected by corticotomy and distraction histogenesis. Union was evaluated radiologically and clinically. Patients' mean age was 37.3 years (18.3-59.3). Mean bone defect was 3.2 cm (1-8 cm). Mean time to union was 40.1 weeks (12.6-80.7 weeks), and median frame index was 75 days/cm. Median lengthening index (time in frame after corticotomy for lengthening) was 63 days/cm. Mean clinic follow-up was 79 weeks (23-174). Six patients had a total of seven complications. Four patients re-fractured after frame removal, one of whom required a second frame. Two patients required a second frame for correction of residual deformity, and one patient developed a stiff non-union which united following a second frame. There were no cases of deep infection. Acute shortening followed by distraction histogenesis is a safe method for the acute treatment of open tibial fractures with bone and soft tissue loss. This method also avoids the cost, logistical issues and morbidity associated with the use of local or free-tissue transfer flaps and has a low rate of serious complications despite the injury severity.Entities:
Keywords: Circular frame; Deformity correction; Distraction histogenesis; Ilizarov frame; Limb reconstruction; Open fractures; Soft tissue flap; Tibia
Year: 2018 PMID: 30203142 PMCID: PMC6249147 DOI: 10.1007/s11751-018-0316-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr ISSN: 1828-8928
Fig. 1Incision made transversely across tibial crest with non-viable bone removed
Fig. 2In this case, the bone ends were cut with a continuously irrigated oscillating saw to ensure sound bony apposition and a stable final construct
Fig. 3Reducing the bone ends produces the acute shortening, and the transverse elliptical incision becomes closable without tension. Final fixation was undertaken in this case with an Ilizarov circular frame, but in more recent cases a monolateral external fixator is more frequently used
Fig. 4Pre-operative AP radiograph (a). First post-operative radiograph (b) showing proximal corticotomy and frame. AP (c) and lateral (d) radiographs of frame during distraction histogenesis. Final AP (e) and lateral (f) radiographs following frame removal
Data for individual patients
| ID | Comorbidity | Age at time of injury | AO fracture classification | Bone loss (mm) | Closure type | Time from injury to debridement at host institution (days) | Time frame on (weeks) | Time of corticotomy post-frame (days) | Time post-fracture follow-up (weeks) | Problems, obstacles and complications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.6 | 43-A3 | 20 | SSG | 2 | 22.0 | 0 | 30 | ||
| 2 | 52.0 | 43-C2 | 20 | SSG | 3 | 14.1 | 0 | 54 | ||
| 3 | 31.2 | 43-A1 | 20 | SSG | 0 | 25.3 | 0 | 68 | 2nd frame for deformity correction | |
| 4 | Drug user | 18.4 | 43-A1 | 50 | P | 3 | 51.7 | 102 | 62 | |
| 5 | DMII, HTN, Ca breast | 29.8 | 43-A3 | 25 | P | 4 | 29.1 | 0 | 174 | Stiff non-union |
| 6 | 51.5 | 43-A3 | 15 | SSG | 0 | 24.3 | 0 | 34 | RF (PoP) | |
| 7 | 33.4 | 43-A3 | 20 | SSG | 0 | 23.3 | 0 | 122 | FC | |
| 8 | DMI, HTN | 59.2 | 42-B1 | 40 | SSG | 4 | 28.4 | 0 | 65 | |
| 9 | 36.5 | 43-C3 | 20 | P | 2 | 43.1 | 112 | 76 | ||
| 10 | 20.5 | 42-B3 | 30 | P | 2 | 27.9 | 40 | 41 | ||
| 11 | Asthma | 45.7 | 43-C2 | 15 | SSG | 3 | 51.1 | 60 | PS (overdrilling) FC | |
| 12 | 28.5 | 42-B3 | 10 | P | 1 | 31.1 | 0 | 42 | ||
| 13 | 26.1 | 43-C3 | 15 | SSG | 3 | 19.3 | 0 | 74 | FC | |
| 14 | 55.9 | 43-C3 | 25 | SSG | 2 | 27.9 | 0 | 54 | ||
| 15 | 31.2 | 42-B3 | 30 | SSG | 3 | 43.7 | 0 | 49 | ||
| 16 | 20.5 | 43-A3 | 25 | SSG | 3 | 25.1 | 88 | PS | ||
| 17 | 28.0 | 43-A3 | 80 | SSG | 5 | 58.1 | 0 | 128 | ||
| 18 | 35.3 | 43-C3 | 40 | SSG | 3 | 50.4 | 71 | 151 | PS | |
| 19 | 58.6 | 42-B2 | 50 | SSG | 57 | 21.3 | 0 | 67 | ||
| 20 | 25.9 | 42-B2 | 25 | P | 0 | 54.3 | 62 | 81 | PS, RF (2nd frame) | |
| 21 | 35.1 | 42-B2 | 30 | P | 10 | 49.3 | 0 | 139 | Ring reapplication, RF (PoP) | |
| 22 | 41.4 | 43-C2 | 20 | SSG | 2 | 15.0 | 0 | 23 | ||
| 23 | 41.8 | 43-A3 | 60 | P | 0 | 60.7 | 51 | 139 | ||
| 24 | 55.8 | 43-C2 | 60 | P | 3 | 53.4 | 0 | 136 | PS | |
| 25 | 20.1 | 42-A3 | 25 | SSG | 0 | 12.6 | 0 | 52 | PS, RF (PoP), 2nd frame for deformity | |
| 26 | IVDU, Etoh xs | 29.9 | 43-A3 | 30 | SSG | 3 | 34.1 | 14 | 41 | |
| 27 | 19.4 | 42-B3 | 40 | SSG | 0 | 34.0 | 21 | 55 | PS (IV) | |
| 28 | 34.5 | 43-A2 | 50 | SSG | 1 | 51.3 | 42 | 65 | ||
| 29 | 51.2 | 42-B2 | 30 | P | 0 | 65.4 | 375 | 100 | PS | |
| 30 | RA, PE (warfarin) | 57.3 | 42-C2 | 50 | P | 42 | 43.9 | 74 | 40 | |
| 31 | 59.3 | 43-A3 | 20 | P | 12 | 16.3 | 0 | 49 |
Comorbidity: DMI, type I diabetes mellitus; DMII, type II diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; IVDU, intravenous drug user; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; PE, previous pulmonary embolism. Closure type: SSG, split skin graft over soft tissue bed; P, primary closure. Problems, obstacles and complications: FC, further corticotomy; PS, pin site infection treated with oral antibiotics; OD, overdrilling of pin site to treat infection; IV, intravenous antibiotic to treat pin site infection; RF, re-fracture; PoP, treated non-operatively