Literature DB >> 30202668

Contribution of Scanopelvimetry in the Prognosis of Childbirth.

Lova Hasina Rajaonarison Ny Ony Narindra1, Christian Tomboravo1, Honjaniaina Rasolohery1, Emmylou Prisca Gabrielle Andrianah1, Gabriel Pierana Randaoharison2, Ahmad Ahmad1.   

Abstract

Objectives To determine the frequency of the demand of radiopelvimetry in pregnant women and to assess the obstetrical prognosis. Methods Retrospective study about 19 months, including a total of 45 pregnant women who underwent scanopelvimetry to evaluate the biometry of the pelvis. Scanopelvimetry was performed from 36th week of pregnancy. Results The average age of the patients was 26.9 years. The frequency of the demand of scanopelvimetry was 0.97%. The height of the patients was greater than 150 cm in 84.44%. The indications of radiopelvimetry were dominated by the clinical suspicion of pelvic narrowing (57.78%), followed by the cephalopelvic confrontation (33.33%) and the cicatricial uterus (8.89%). Narrowed pelvis was observed in 28.89% of cases (13/45), with a Magnin index of less than 21. A caesarean section during labor was performed in 24.44% of the cases. No death of newborn was reported. Conclusion The frequency of the demand of scanopelvimetry is low but the rate of surgical pelvis is high among suspect cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  childbirth mode; magnin index; narrowed basin; scanopelvimetry

Year:  2018        PMID: 30202668      PMCID: PMC6128585          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  12 in total

1.  [Predictive factors of the delivery method in women with cesarean section scars].

Authors:  M Lehmann; G Hedelin; C Sorgue; J L Göllner; C Grall; A Chami; D Collin
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  1999-07

2.  [Dosimetry comparison of pelvimetry methods using conventional radiographs and CT].

Authors:  A Resten; F Mausoléo; M Suissa; M Valéro; S Taylor; D Musset
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  2001-09

3.  [Fetal-pelvic disproportion and X-ray pelvimetry].

Authors:  P Frémondière; A Fournié
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil       Date:  2010-12-24

4.  Measurement error in computed tomography pelvimetry.

Authors:  N Anderson; N Humphries; J E Wells
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  2005-04

5.  [X-ray pelvimetry practice survey in Northeast French maternities].

Authors:  R Sataf; E Gauchotte; J Muhlstein; C Bernard; G Gauchotte; O Morel
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2014-06-05

6.  Pelvimetry revisited: analyzing cephalopelvic disproportion.

Authors:  Miriam S Lenhard; Thorsten R C Johnson; Sabine Weckbach; Konstantin Nikolaou; Klaus Friese; Uwe Hasbargen
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Anthropometric measurements in the diagnosis of pelvic size: an analysis of maternal height and shoe size and computed tomography pelvimetric data.

Authors:  Awoniyi O Awonuga; Zaher Merhi; Modupe T Awonuga; Terri-Ann Samuels; Jennifer Waller; David Pring
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 2.344

8.  [Trial of labor in moderate pelvic dystocia at Dakar University Teaching Hospital].

Authors:  C-T Cissé; C Kokaina; O Ndiaye; J-C Moreau
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2004-06

9.  Value of computed tomography pelvimetry in patients with a previous cesarean section.

Authors:  T Y Yamani; A A Rouzi
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526

10.  [Is there still any interest of x-ray pelvimetry for women with a scarred uterus].

Authors:  A-S Peultier; N Cazenave; G Boog
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2009-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.