Literature DB >> 15845044

Measurement error in computed tomography pelvimetry.

N Anderson1, N Humphries, J E Wells.   

Abstract

Computed tomography pelvimetry is still used in clinical practice. We wished to quantify observer error in order to assess the level of confidence with which pelvic measurements can be described as adequate or inadequate. Anteroposterior inlet, anteroposterior outlet, transverse inlet and interspinous distances were measured from 11 CT pelvimetry examinations by five observers at one institution. Three CT pelvimetries were measured by five observers at a second institution. Intraobserver and interobserver variation was assessed using analysis of variance. Reliability of measurements was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient. Combined error was calculated to determine 95% confidence limits for published minimum recommended pelvic measurements. The standard error of measurement, combining all sources, for measurement of the bony dimensions of the pelvis were: for anteroposterior inlet, 2.0 mm; anteroposterior outlet, 6.9 mm; transverse inlet, 1.3 mm; and interspinous distance, 2.1 mm. The 95% confidence interval around the recommended anteroposterior outlet of 100 mm was 88.5-111.3 mm. Observer variation in measurement of anteroposterior outlet is so large as to make the measurement of doubtful clinical utility.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15845044     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2005.01417.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Radiol        ISSN: 0004-8461


  5 in total

1.  A new tilt on pelvic radiographs: a pilot study.

Authors:  P J Richards; J M Pattison; J Belcher; R W Decann; Suzanne Anderson; C Wynn-Jones
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Which Foetal-Pelvic Variables Are Useful for Predicting Caesarean Section and Instrumental Assistance?

Authors:  P Frémondière; L Thollon; P Adalian; J Delotte; F Marchal
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Contribution of Scanopelvimetry in the Prognosis of Childbirth.

Authors:  Lova Hasina Rajaonarison Ny Ony Narindra; Christian Tomboravo; Honjaniaina Rasolohery; Emmylou Prisca Gabrielle Andrianah; Gabriel Pierana Randaoharison; Ahmad Ahmad
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-07-06

4.  Intra- and inter-rater reliability in a comparative study of cross-sectional and spiral computed tomography pelvimetry methods.

Authors:  Erika Phexell; Anna Åkesson; Marcus Söderberg; Anetta Bolejko
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2019-06-11

5.  Anatomical basis for the choice of laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer through the pelvic imaging data-a cohort study.

Authors:  Zhou Yang; Guo Chunhua; Yuan Huayan; Yang Jianguo; Cheng Yong
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.754

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.