Literature DB >> 30202343

Optimizing the Intensity of Lifestyle Medicine Interventions: Similar Outcomes for Half the Sessions.

Darren P Morton1,2,3, Lillian Kent1,2,3, Paul Rankin1,2,3, Brett Mitchell1,2,3, Karina Parker1,2,3, John Gobble1,2,3, Hans Diehl1,2,3.   

Abstract

Lifestyle medicine interventions are typically intensive by design. This study explored the optimal "dosage" of a well-known lifestyle medicine intervention-the Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP). A total of 2383 individuals (mean age = 61.0 ± 9.2 years; 34% males) participated in either an 8-session (N = 448) or 16-session (N = 1935) version of the CHIP intervention conducted over 4 weeks in community settings throughout North America. Both the 8- and 16-session groups experienced significant improvements in all the chronic disease risk factors measured. There was no difference between the changes experienced by the 8- and 16-session groups in lipid profile, fasting plasma glucose, or systolic blood pressure. The 8-session group experienced a significantly greater reduction in body mass (0.3 percentage points or 0.8 lbs, P < .01), but the 16-session group recorded a significantly greater reduction in diastolic blood pressure (2.8 percentage points or 2.2 mm Hg, P < .01). There was no clear difference between the outcomes achieved in 4 weeks by the 8- and 16-session versions of the CHIP lifestyle medicine intervention. This study suggests that the short-term outcomes achieved by a 16-session CHIP intervention can be achieved in half the number of sessions, which has implications from a resourcing and cost-effectiveness perspective.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic disease; disease management; health promotion; lifestyle intervention; risk factors

Year:  2015        PMID: 30202343      PMCID: PMC6125077          DOI: 10.1177/1559827615612420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med        ISSN: 1559-8276


  16 in total

1.  Raising the priority of preventing chronic diseases: a political process.

Authors:  Robert Geneau; David Stuckler; Sylvie Stachenko; Martin McKee; Shah Ebrahim; Sanjay Basu; Arun Chockalingham; Modi Mwatsama; Rozmin Jamal; Ala Alwan; Robert Beaglehole
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Gender differences in effectiveness of the Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP).

Authors:  Lillian M Kent; Darren P Morton; Paul M Rankin; John E Gobble; Hans A Diehl
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 3.045

3.  Individual versus group therapy for obesity: effects of matching participants to their treatment preferences.

Authors:  D A Renjilian; M G Perri; A M Nezu; W F McKelvey; R L Shermer; S D Anton
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2001-08

4.  Healthy living is the best revenge: findings from the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition-Potsdam study.

Authors:  Earl S Ford; Manuela M Bergmann; Janine Kröger; Anja Schienkiewitz; Cornelia Weikert; Heiner Boeing
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-08-10

5.  Gender differences in effectiveness of the Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP) lifestyle intervention: an Australasian study.

Authors:  Lillian M Kent; Darren P Morton; Paul M Rankin; Brett G Mitchell; Esther Chang; Hans Diehl
Journal:  Health Promot J Austr       Date:  2014-12

6.  A way to reverse CAD?

Authors:  Caldwell B Esselstyn; Gina Gendy; Jonathan Doyle; Mladen Golubic; Michael F Roizen
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Can lifestyle changes reverse coronary heart disease? The Lifestyle Heart Trial.

Authors:  D Ornish; S E Brown; L W Scherwitz; J H Billings; W T Armstrong; T A Ports; S M McLanahan; R L Kirkeeide; R J Brand; K L Gould
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Changes in prostate gene expression in men undergoing an intensive nutrition and lifestyle intervention.

Authors:  Dean Ornish; Mark Jesus M Magbanua; Gerdi Weidner; Vivian Weinberg; Colleen Kemp; Christopher Green; Michael D Mattie; Ruth Marlin; Jeff Simko; Katsuto Shinohara; Christopher M Haqq; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Prostate cancer prevention by nutritional means to alleviate metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  R James Barnard
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Long-term effectiveness of the community-based Complete Health Improvement Program (CHIP) lifestyle intervention: a cohort study.

Authors:  Lillian Kent; Darren Morton; Trevor Hurlow; Paul Rankin; Althea Hanna; Hans Diehl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.