| Literature DB >> 30201927 |
Yi Lu1,2, Long Chen3, Yiyang Yang4, Zhonghua Gou5.
Abstract
Previous studies have documented numerous health benefits of conducting regular physical activity among older adults. The built environment is believed to be a key factor that can hinder or facilitate daily physical activity, such as walking and exercising. However, most empirical studies focusing on environment-physical activity associations exhibited residential self-selection bias with cross-sectional research design, engendering doubts about the impact of built environment on physical activity. To reduce this bias, we assessed physical activity behaviors of 720 Hong Kong older adults (≥65 years) residing in 24 public housing estates. The Hong Kong public housing scheme currently provides affordable rental flats for 2.1 million people or approximate 30% of total population. The applicants were allocated to one of 179 housing estates largely by family size and flat availability. Built environment characteristics were measured following the '5Ds' principle: (street network) design, (land-use) diversity, density, distance to transit, and destination accessibility. Multilevel mixed models were used to explore the associations between the built environment and the different domains of physical activity (transportation walking, recreational walking, and recreational moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) while controlling for potential estate-level socioeconomic and individual confounders. We found that transportation walking was positively associated with the number of bus stops and the presence of Mass Transit Railway (MTR) stations. Recreational MVPA was positively related to the number of recreational facilities. However, land-use mix was negatively related to transportation walking, recreational walking, and recreational MVPA. The findings of this study support a threshold effect in the environment-physical activity associations. Furthermore, large-scale public housing schemes involving random or semi-random residence assignment in many cities may provide opportunities to explore built environments and physical activity behavior, with the potential to overcome residential self-selection bias.Entities:
Keywords: built environment; high-density; older adults; physical activity; walking
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30201927 PMCID: PMC6163974 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15091973
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Aerial image (a) and street-level image (b) of one public housing estate in Hong Kong (Ching Ho Estate, built in 2006 with 7200 rental flats). Public housing estates generally consist of multiple 30-to 40-story residential towers and surrounding public spaces built for physical and leisure activities (Source: Google maps, 2016).
Built environment characteristics of 24 public housing estates in Hong Kong, 2016.
| 5D Framework | Built Environment Variables | Mean (SD) |
|---|---|---|
| Density | Population density-all (persons/km2) | 74,911 (19,273) |
| Low (<76,871) | 59,500 (10,657) | |
| High (≥76,871) | 90,322 (11,139) | |
| Diversity | Land-use mix (entropy score) | 0.50 (0.31) |
| Low (<0.37) | 0.26 (0.05) | |
| High (≥0.37) | 0.75 (0.26) | |
| Design | Street intersection density-all (#/km2) | 84.71 (57.67) |
| Low (<102) | 79.81 (21.54) | |
| High (≥102) | 127.16 (27.30) | |
| Distance to transit | No. of bus stops-all | 45.13 (31.04) |
| Low (<34) | 19.67 (8.35) | |
| High (≥34) | 70.48 (21.97) | |
| Presence of MTR station | No. of estates (%) | |
| No (0) | 12 (50%) | |
| Yes (1) | 12 (50%) | |
| Destination accessibility | No. of retail shops-all | 27.08 (17.11) |
| Low (<22) | 13.38 (5.32) | |
| High (≥22) | 40.58 (12.99) | |
| No. of recreational facilities-all | 31.54 (22.24) | |
| Low (<29) | 14.17 (7.67) | |
| High (≥29) | 48.92 (16.92) |
Characteristics of the 720 study participants residing in 24 public housing estates in Hong Kong, 2016.
| Variables | No. of Participants (%) | No. of Participants Achieving ≥150 min Transportation Walking (%) | No. of Participants Achieving ≥150 min Recreational Walking (%) | No. of Participants Achieving ≥150 min MVPA Walking (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 720 (100%) | 255 (35.4%) | 424 (58.9%) | 277 (38.5%) |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 345 (47.9%) | 115 (33.3%) | 201 (58.3%) | 130 (37.7%) |
| Female | 375 (52.1%) | 140 (37.3%) | 223 (59.5%) | 147 (39.2%) |
| Household income | ||||
| <HK$12,000 | 439 (61.0%) | 156 (35.5%) | 257 (58.5%) | 155 (35.3%) |
| ≥HK$12,000 | 281 (39.0%) | 99 (35.2%) | 167 (59.4%) | 122 (43.4%) |
| Age | ||||
| 65–74 | 512 (71.1%) | 185 (36.1%) | 297 (58.0%) | 204 (39.8%) |
| ≥75 | 208 (28.9%) | 70 (33.7%) | 127 (61.1%) | 73 (35.1%) |
Multilevel logistic regression of built environment factors and the odds of achieving regular transportation walking (≥150 min), recreational walking (≥150 min), and recreational MVPA (≥150 min) for 720 older adults in Hong Kong, while controlling for other covariates.
| Built Environment Factors | Transportation Walking | Recreational Walking | Recreational MVPA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| Intersection density | ||||||
| Low (<102) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||
| High (≥102) | 1.23 (0.82–1.85) | 0.31 | 1.07 (0.73–1.59) | 0.71 | 0.97 (0.65–1.45) | 0.89 |
| Population density | ||||||
| Low (<76,871) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||
| High (≥76,871) | 1.45 (0.90–2.11) | 0.06 | 1.00 (0.70–1.42) | 0.99 | 0.82 (0.56–1.18) | 0.28 |
| Land-use mix | ||||||
| Low (<0.37) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||
| High (≥0.37) | 0.87 (0.78–0.96) | <0.01 ** | 0.85 (0.73–0.95) | <0.01 ** | 0.78 (0.64–0.91) | <0.01 ** |
| No. of bus stops | ||||||
| Low (<34) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||
| High (≥34) | 1.03 (1.01–1.05) | <0.01 ** | 0.98 (0.96–0.99) | 0.02 * | 0.96 (0.95–0.97) | <0.01 ** |
| Presence of MTR station | ||||||
| No (0) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||
| Yes (1) | 1.20 (1.04–1.38) | <0.01 ** | 1.03 (0.89–1.38) | 0.13 | 0.91 (0.79–1.05) | 0.22 |
| No. of retail shops | ||||||
| Low (<22) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||
| High (≥22) | 0.98 (0.86–1.09) | 0.19 | 0.89 (0.63–1.25) | 0.50 | 0.96 (0.92–1.02) | 0.06 |
| No. of recreational facilities | ||||||
| Low (<29) | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||
| High (≥29) | 1.01 (0.88–1.12) | 0.21 | 1.01 (0.99–1.02) | 0.21 | 1.11 (1.04–1.18) | <0.01 ** |
Note 1: ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05. OR = Odds ratio, CI = Confidential interval. Note 2: Individual and estate-level covariates controlled in the models included: gender, age, participant’s household income and estate-level median household income. All built environment variables were entered the models simultaneously.