| Literature DB >> 30201921 |
Dongxiao Gu1,2, Xuejie Yang3, Xingguo Li4, Hemant K Jain5, Changyong Liang6.
Abstract
With the rapid advancement of Web 2.0 technologies, Internet medicine, and mobile healthcare, the influence of the use of patient-oriented Mobile Internet-based Health Services (MIHS) on patient satisfaction and the electronic word-of-mouth (WOM) of health service agencies is becoming the focus of the academic research community. Many large hospitals, including some Internet hospitals, have provided various online healthcare service platforms that enable patients to expediently consult with physicians and obtain healthcare services in an online to offline format. The purpose of this study is to analyze the main mechanisms of how the features and users' experiences of MIHS influenced patient satisfaction and continuous use behaviors of the system to generate additional WOM dissemination behaviors. Based on post-adoption behavior and Expectation Confirmation Model of Information Technology Continuance (ECM-IT), this study conducted an empirical study through data collection from users (patients) from a large hospital providing online healthcare services. A total of 494 pieces of data were collected and analyzed using SmartPLS2.0(SmartPLS GmbH, Hamburg, Gernmany). The results show that: (1) patient satisfaction with MIHS and their intentions to continue use of MIHS have significantly positive influences on WOM; (2) patient satisfaction with MIHS is positively influenced by perceived usefulness and confirmation of MIHS performance expectations; (3) and patient intentions to continue use of MIHS are also affected by some technology factors, such as facilitating conditions and perceived risk, as well as some subjective feelings, such as perceived usefulness and perceived interactivity. The results of this study provide important implications for both research and practice of public health.Entities:
Keywords: Internet medicine; expectation confirmation model; mobile Internet-based health service; patient participation; patient satisfaction; patient word-of-mouth
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30201921 PMCID: PMC6164192 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15091972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Research Model.
Figure 2The main features of MIHS.
Measures of constructs.
| Construct | Item ID | Items | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Confirmation of MIHS performance expectations | CPE01 | My experience with using MIHS was better than what I expected. | Hong et al., 2006 [ |
| CPE02 | The service level provided by MIHS was better than what I expected. | ||
| CPE03 | The service level provided by MIHS are really same as what I expected. | ||
| CPE04 | Overall, most of my expectations from using MIHS were confirmed. | ||
| Facilitating Conditions | FC01 | I have the resources necessary to use the MIHS system. | Ajzen 1991 [ |
| FC02 | I have the knowledge necessary to use the MIHS system. | ||
| FC03 | Given the resources, opportunities and knowledge it takes to use the MIHS system, it would be easy for me to use the system. | ||
| Intention to continued use of MIHS | ICU01 | I intend to continue using MIHS frequently during the next three months. | Ajzen 1991 [ |
| ICU02 | I intend to continue using MIHS for online registration, bills checking, consultation, evaluations, and etc. during the next three months. | ||
| Perceived interactivity | PI01 | MIHS allows me to interact with it to receive various health service or communicate with others. | Song and Zahedi, 2005 [ |
| PI02 | MIHS has interactive features, which help me accomplish my task. | ||
| PI03 | I can interact with the MIHS system in order to get specific information or provide feedback/evaluation. | ||
| Perceived risk | PR01 | I think it is risky to provide my personal information in the MIHS system. | McKnight, et al., 2002 [ |
| PR02 | I think it is risky to input my bank card information for registration, bill paying or prepaid. | ||
| PR03 | Entering personal information over the MIHS system is unsafe | ||
| Perceived usefulness | PU01 | The MIHS system is useful for searching and obtain the information I need. | Yoon, 2009 [ |
| PU02 | The MIHS system enhances my effectiveness in obtaining healthcare service. | ||
| PU03 | The MIHS system enables me to get healthcare service faster. | ||
| PU04 | Using MIHS system will improve my performance. | ||
| PU05 | Using MIHS system will increase my productivity during health service process. | ||
| Patient Satisfaction with MIHS | PS01 | I am pleased with my use of MIHS system. | Bhattacherjee & Premkumar, 2004 [ |
| PS02 | I am satisfied with my use of MIHS system. | ||
| Electronic word-of-mouth (WOM) | WOM01 | I am willingness to recommend MIHS to others. | Harrison-Walker, 2001 [ |
| WOM02 | Exactly I will tell the other person that MIHS is very good. | ||
| WOM03 | I am willing to tell other people about the good aspects of MIHS. | ||
| WOM04 | Told my friends and relatives about my good experience of using MIHS. | ||
| WOM05 | I will mention this good service of MIHS to others quite frequently. | ||
| WOM06 | I will tell more people about the service of MIHS. | ||
| WOM07 | I am proud to tell others that I use MIHS service. |
MIHS: patient-oriented Mobile Internet-based Health Services.
Sample Demographics.
| Category | Number (%) |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Male | 253 (51.21%) |
| Female | 241 (48.79%) |
|
| |
| <18 years old | 4 (0.81%) |
| 18–28 years old | 103 (20.85%) |
| 28–48 years old | 169 (34.21%) |
| 48–60 years old | 103 (20.85%) |
| >60 years old | 115 (23.28%) |
|
| |
| Elementary school | 62 (12.55%) |
| Middle school | 123 (24.90%) |
| High school | 135 (27.33%) |
| College | 162 (32.79%) |
| Graduate school | 12 (02.43%) |
|
| |
| Consultations about registration, card opening, prepay | 456 (92.31%) |
| Consultation about bills (avg. use duration of this function: 23.4 months) | 471 (95.34%) |
| Satisfaction Evaluations (avg. use duration of this function: 20.7 months) | 429 (86.84%) |
| Consulting individual diseases with medical staff (avg. use duration of this function: 19.9 months) | 415 (84.01%) |
| Others such as appointment cancelling, nursing consultation, etc. (avg. use duration of this function: 21.3 months) | 436 (87.85%) |
|
| |
| Outpatient | 32 (06.48%) |
| Inpatient <5 days | 96 (19.43%) |
| Inpatient 6–10 days | 156 (31.58%) |
| Inpatient 11–20 days | 133 (26.92%) |
| Inpatient >20 days | 77 (15.59%) |
Descriptive statistics of the measure.
| Construct | Item Statistics | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construct Items | Mean | Std. Deviation | Loading 1 | |
| Confirmation of MIHS performance expectations | CPE01 | 5.60 | 1.23 | 0.7951 |
| CPE02 | 5.44 | 1.24 | 0.8270 | |
| CPE03 | 5.61 | 1.23 | 0.8508 | |
| CPE04 | 5.78 | 1.19 | 0.8730 | |
| Facilitating conditions | FC01 | 5.46 | 1.49 | 0.7480 |
| FC02 | 5.65 | 1.38 | 0.8544 | |
| FC03 | 5.69 | 1.38 | 0.8572 | |
| Intention to continued use of MIHS | ICU01 | 5.69 | 1.20 | 0.8950 |
| ICU02 | 5.62 | 1.29 | 0.8848 | |
| Perceived interactivity | PI01 | 5.77 | 1.20 | 0.8293 |
| PI02 | 5.86 | 1.19 | 0.8662 | |
| PI03 | 5.65 | 1.28 | 0.8163 | |
| Perceived risk | PR01 | 3.41 | 1.93 | 0.8708 |
| PR02 | 4.12 | 2.04 | 0.8440 | |
| PR03 | 3.86 | 1.91 | 0.7674 | |
| Perceived usefulness | PU01 | 6.07 | 1.10 | 0.8150 |
| PU02 | 6.02 | 1.10 | 0.7965 | |
| PU03 | 6.02 | 1.05 | 0.8435 | |
| PU04 | 5.93 | 1.16 | 0.8177 | |
| PU05 | 5.83 | 1.18 | 0.7494 | |
| Patient satisfaction with MIHS | PS01 | 5.75 | 1.45 | 0.8950 |
| PS02 | 5.63 | 1.46 | 0.8848 | |
| Electronic word-of-mouth(WOM) | WOM01 | 5.99 | 1.18 | 0.7999 |
| WOM02 | 6.17 | 1.06 | 0.7809 | |
| WOM03 | 6.04 | 1.09 | 0.8258 | |
| WOM04 | 5.71 | 1.23 | 0.7823 | |
| WOM05 | 5.88 | 1.17 | 0.8102 | |
| WOM06 | 6.06 | 1.07 | 0.8084 | |
| WOM07 | 5.74 | 1.20 | 0.7869 | |
1 The loading is reported by SmartPLS 2.0. It shows a high correlation level between observed variables and structural variables.
Measurement model results.
| Composite Reliability | Cronbach’s Alpha | AVE 1 | CPE | FC | ICU | PI | PR | PU | PS | WOM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.8812 | 0.7981 | 0.7121 |
| |||||||
|
| 0.8705 | 0.7769 | 0.6916 | 0.7992 |
| ||||||
|
| 0.8839 | 0.7374 | 0.7919 | 0.6429 | 0.6063 |
| |||||
|
| 0.8756 | 0.788 | 0.7013 | 0.677 | 0.6183 | 0.7159 |
| ||||
|
| 0.8676 | 0.7812 | 0.6865 | −0.2154 | −0.2115 | −0.2218 | −0.2235 |
| |||
|
| 0.8995 | 0.851 | 0.6912 | 0.6546 | 0.5965 | 0.6918 | 0.7817 | −0.1018 |
| ||
|
| 0.9003 | 0.7786 | 0.8187 | 0.8016 | 0.7924 | 0.6238 | 0.6539 | −0.1842 | 0.6277 |
| |
|
| 0.9294 | 0.9134 | 0.6221 | 0.7336 | 0.6848 | 0.6561 | 0.7174 | −0.1365 | 0.7887 | 0.7199 |
|
1 AVE stands for Average Variance Extract. The bold numbers listed diagonally are the square root of the variance shared between the constructs and their measures. The off-diagonal elements are the correlations among the constructs. For discriminate validity, the diagonal elements should be larger than the off-diagonal elements.
Figure 3Model results. Path coefficients with t value in parentheses; * represents p < 0.05; ** represents p < 0.01.
Structural parameter estimates.
| Hypothesized Path | Results | |
|---|---|---|
| H1: Patient satisfaction with MIHS → WOM | 13.244 ** | Supported |
| H2: Intention to continued use of MIHS → WOM | 8.194 ** | Supported |
| H3: Patient satisfaction with MIHS → Intention to continue use of MIHS | 2.041 * | Supported |
| H4: Confirmation of MIHS performance expectation → Patient satisfaction with MIHS | 20.086 ** | Supported |
| H5: Confirmation of MIHS performance expectation → Perceived usefulness | 5.021 ** | Supported |
| H6: Perceived usefulness → Patient satisfaction with MIHS | 4.606 ** | Supported |
| H7: Perceived usefulness → Intention to continued use of MIHS | 4.861 ** | Supported |
| H8: Perceived interactivity → Perceived usefulness | 13.77 ** | Supported |
| H9: Perceived interactivity → Intention to continued use of MIHS | 4.799 ** | Supported |
| H10: Perceived risk → Intention to continued use of MIHS | 2.484 * | Supported |
| H11: Facilitation conditions → Intention to continued use of MIHS | 2.166 * | Supported |
* represents p < 0.05; ** represents p < 0.01.